Posts: 5,148
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
25
(09-06-2021, 06:54 PM)Broly Wrote: I'm still waiting for the the media to hold biden "responsible" for the covid deaths since he's been in office, like they did trump......I have a feeling that i'll be waiting a while..... 'Member' when biden said he was going to beat the Rona in his first 100 days?Â
Yep under Trump they had the daily ticker and under his presidency we lost 400k Americans. A stat which at the time included anyone who died that had covid. Under Joe with aq vaccine and with increased knowledge how to treat we lost around 220 k Americans. Not one ticker.
Posts: 9,102
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation:
22
(09-06-2021, 12:33 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: Actually you are the one repeating the CCP line all day every day. I buy nothing they say. You buy every word except whatever fits your computerdude worldview. The more you struggle the more we realize why you have nothing to do.
You are a clown, and likely the only one here that doesn't see it. You got dog-walked for like 200 pages on the thread that Zig shut down in order to save you while you were drowning.
The last thing in the world I am is a ChiCom stooge like yourself...quite the opposite actually. Every single post I've ever made on the subject would show that, I believe.
Posts: 18,300
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
(09-06-2021, 09:24 PM)Syncro Wrote: (09-06-2021, 12:33 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: Actually you are the one repeating the CCP line all day every day. I buy nothing they say. You buy every word except whatever fits your computerdude worldview. The more you struggle the more we realize why you have nothing to do.
You are a clown, and likely the only one here that doesn't see it. You got dog-walked for like 200 pages on the thread that Zig shut down in order to save you while you were drowning.Â
The last thing in the world I am is a ChiCom stooge like yourself...quite the opposite actually. Every single post I've ever made on the subject would show that, I believe. computerdude post variant number 4. You have about 6 posts you repeat over and over again. You really don†t get it do you?
Posts: 14,614
Threads: 2,352
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
46
09-06-2021, 11:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-06-2021, 11:21 PM by K9Buck.)
Latest on Fauci's Covid "gain of function" research.
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1...44579?s=19
Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...
- Benito Mussolini
Posts: 9,102
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation:
22
(09-06-2021, 11:21 PM)K9Buck Wrote: Latest on Fauci's Covid "gain of function" research.
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1...44579?s=19
Nothing to see here K9...the China stooge has assured us there is no evidence of manipulation in this virus.
It's probably time for Zig to reopen the original thread. I haven't forgotten ChiComDoc mocking me for bringing up Daszak, Baric and Zhengli early in the process.
Turns out he really has been wrong all along, about most everything.
Posts: 29,008
Threads: 690
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
48
Was scrolling through those tweets. Apparently the Maddow tweet regarding the Oklahoma hospitals is still up. Not even flagged. Etc...  Check your calendars, it's really 1984.
Posts: 518
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2020
Reputation:
10
(09-06-2021, 11:21 PM)K9Buck Wrote: Latest on Fauci's Covid "gain of function" research.
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1...44579?s=19
Make it easier Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that the EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab leak theory seriously. “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten,†Chan said. “Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?â€
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, the documents contain critical information about the research done in Wuhan, including about the creation of novel viruses. “The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell,†Ebright wrote to The Intercept after reviewing the documents. Ebright also said that the documents make it clear that two different types of novel coronaviruses were able to infect humanized mice. “While they were working on SARS-related coronavirus, they were carrying out a parallel project at the same time on MERS-related coronavirus,†Ebright said, referring to the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Posts: 9,102
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation:
22
(09-07-2021, 08:29 AM)dumbname Wrote: Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that the EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab leak theory seriously.
If EcoHealth wanted to take the lab leak hypothesis seriously why did Daszak do everything he possibly could to discredit it from Day 1?
If Daszak was so impartial and purely interested in the facts then why was he removed from the UN team trying to investigate the origin?
Maybe the ChinaStooge can help to answer these simple questions, since you know, he's pretty well been on top of this since he was riding the Guano Theory until those wheels fell off...
NEW DETAILS EMERGE ABOUT CORONAVIRUS RESEARCH AT CHINESE LAB
More than 900 pages of materials related to US.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit
NEWLY RELEASED DOCUMENTS provide details of U.S.-funded research on several types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The Intercept has obtained more than nine hundred pages of documents detailing the work of the EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory. The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates relating to the EcoHealth Alliance†s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic.
The documents were released in connection with ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health. The Intercept is making the full documents available to the public.
“This is a roadmap to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,†said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right To Know, a group that has been investigating the origins of Covid-19.
One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,†outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.
The bat coronavirus grant provided the EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans. Even before the pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments. The grant proposal acknowledges some of those dangers: “Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.â€
More:
https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-...inese-lab/
Posts: 18,300
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
Actually the stuff posted above is about work on chimeric viruses. The virus that caused this pandemic wasn't a chimera. So much ado about nothing there. This virus is not related to that kind of research. That would be spotted. Those are Frankenstein's monster type of viruses.
Posts: 9,102
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation:
22
Unsurprisingly, ChinaDoc intentionally avoids recognizing the correlation between chimeric research and GoF research.
Those damn hikers with Laotian bat sh*t on their boot…we need to find those rascals and teach them a real lesson, right ChinaDoc?!
The intentional ignorance would be painful if it wasnâ€t so laughable.
Posts: 18,300
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
09-07-2021, 11:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2021, 11:31 AM by 3rdgensooner.)
(09-07-2021, 11:26 AM)Syncro Wrote: Unsurprisingly, ChinaDoc intentionally avoids recognizing the correlation between chimeric research and GoF research.
Those damn hikers with Laotian bat sh*t on their boot…we need to find those rascals and teach them a real lesson, right ChinaDoc?!
The intentional ignorance would be painful if it wasnâ€t so laughable. Unsurprisingly you don't even know what I'm talking about. Sitting on the couch all day getting drunk doesn't allow for a very sharp or educated mind.Â
They were doing a specific type of research involving chimeric viruses. There is controversy surrounding whether it should be called gain of function or not but that is immaterial. The virus wasn't such a chimera so the docs are fairly meaningless. If you ever get a lane stay in it. This is way over your head if you can't comprehend something that simple computerdude.
|