Posts: 16,699
Threads: 849
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation:
34
(06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t.
The highest functioning animal has far less consciousness than Fettermann. Pitch thinks there is an equivalence between humans and animals. I would hope that pitch has greater awareness than Fettermann, but now I’m not sure given his statements on religion and consciousness.
"Don't, I say don't bother me dog, can't ya see I'm thinkin'?" Foghorn Leghorn
(06-19-2023, 05:28 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t. 100% relevant. Same sort of thing.
Yep. It's all based on believing something on poor evidence. RFKJ is still pushing the MMR vaccine that causes autism. That is based on one underpowered, debunked and now retracted study.
Posts: 18,390
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
06-19-2023, 05:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-19-2023, 05:40 PM by 3rdgensooner.)
(06-19-2023, 05:31 PM)Syncro Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:28 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t. 100% relevant. Same sort of thing.
Someone like yourself who has bowed at the alter of Fauci for several years might just have that same take.
Totally checks out. Altar perhaps? Link?
You're promoting the goofy views of an ex junkie conspiracy nut here. Same sort of stuff as flat Earthers, Creationists, and all manner of loopy conspiracy types. Very equivalent and relevant. Debating him would be like a judge "debating" a Sovereign Citizen.
Posts: 16,699
Threads: 849
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation:
34
(06-19-2023, 04:31 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: (06-19-2023, 03:57 PM)ChinaBuck Wrote: Nothing wrong with public debate. In most cases, neither is changing their mind, but those that watch can see how the debaters frame their argument. Agree. But one doesn't debate with the schizophrenic whether the CIA is messaging him through his fillings. That's a waste of time. Same with the likes of Kennedy.
There is a difference between a debate and an argument. An argument with a pig is useless, all you do is get dirty and the pig likes it. A debate is a moderated forum with rules of engagement. Arguments with pigs yields no results (such as with a certain poster on this board). A debate is for the public to make their own assessments, not for the debaters. So I see zero problem with the debate going forward. Not only will it reveal much, but it will put peculiar views into perspective.
Debate, no matter the views, deserves to be heard.
"Don't, I say don't bother me dog, can't ya see I'm thinkin'?" Foghorn Leghorn
Posts: 29,158
Threads: 690
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
48
(06-19-2023, 05:28 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t. 100% relevant. Same sort of thing.
You can follow the evidence back to a likely lab leak or straight nature. Creationism, otoh, is a different starting point, but I’ve heard of creationists with strong backgrounds in science claiming that science simply buttresses their position. But I’m sure 99.9% of the science community would disagree.
I would like to hear people like Pitch’s take on evolution and see how it lines up with yours. The general public believes we evolved from ape like creatures because that’s what we were taught in public schools. You think it’s BS, but that is precisely what they taught us. Pitch, I would guess, probably believes in something similar.
The artists rendition (Lol) of our ancestors wasn’t very flattering
Posts: 10,443
Threads: 244
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
30
06-19-2023, 06:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-19-2023, 06:38 PM by maize.)
Quote:"Let’s face it. When you have RFK Jr. and Joe Rogan and Elon Musk all tag-teaming, those tres hombres at the same time ... That probably includes just about every follower on Twitter. So, it’s pretty overwhelming," Hotez said.
Quote:quote:
Hotez tweeted Sunday night he has no plans to debate Kennedy, even with all the harassment he's received.
"Science is not something that is typically debated like say 18th enlightenment philosophy or political issues," he said
Science is not something that is typically debated. LMAO.
Posts: 6,902
Threads: 185
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
34
(06-19-2023, 05:35 PM)ChinaBuck Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t.
The highest functioning animal has far less consciousness than Fettermann. Pitch thinks there is an equivalence between humans and animals. I would hope that pitch has greater awareness than Fettermann, but now I’m not sure given his statements on religion and consciousness.
Do Buddhists believe in human to bug to animal to human again reincarnation like Hindus? I know they believe that the spirit/essence of various Lamas-Dalai, others, are transferred from generation to generation.
Posts: 6,902
Threads: 185
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
34
(06-19-2023, 05:59 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:28 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t. 100% relevant. Same sort of thing.
You can follow the evidence back to a likely lab leak or straight nature. Creationism, otoh, is a different starting point, but I’ve heard of creationists with strong backgrounds in science claiming that science simply buttresses their position. But I’m sure 99.9% of the science community would disagree.
I would like to hear people like Pitch’s take on evolution and see how it lines up with yours. The general public believes we evolved from ape like creatures because that’s what we were taught in public schools. You think it’s BS, but that is precisely what they taught us. Pitch, I would guess, probably believes in something similar.
The artists rendition (Lol) of our ancestors wasn’t very flattering
It’s not evolving from apes, it’s sharing a common ancestor. Humans and chimpanzees share something like 98.6% common DNA-they obviously split a lot later than, say, humans and frogs-70% common DNA.
Posts: 10,443
Threads: 244
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
30
Quote: <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Compilation of his advice.
2 shots, 3 shots, 4 shots, 5 shots, yearly shots, and every few months shots.
He absolutely needs to be cross-examined.
Posts: 29,158
Threads: 690
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
48
(06-19-2023, 06:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:59 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:28 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote: (06-19-2023, 05:21 PM)Syncro Wrote: Get the religious nonsense outta here…it’s totally irrelevant. Same with the flat earth sh*t. 100% relevant. Same sort of thing.
You can follow the evidence back to a likely lab leak or straight nature. Creationism, otoh, is a different starting point, but I’ve heard of creationists with strong backgrounds in science claiming that science simply buttresses their position. But I’m sure 99.9% of the science community would disagree.
I would like to hear people like Pitch’s take on evolution and see how it lines up with yours. The general public believes we evolved from ape like creatures because that’s what we were taught in public schools. You think it’s BS, but that is precisely what they taught us. Pitch, I would guess, probably believes in something similar.
The artists rendition (Lol) of our ancestors wasn’t very flattering
It’s not evolving from apes, it’s sharing a common ancestor. Humans and chimpanzees share something like 98.6% common DNA-they obviously split a lot later than, say, humans and frogs-70% common DNA.
So we have a common ancestor lower than apes on the evolutionary scale. Tomato tomatoe
Posts: 18,390
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
06-19-2023, 07:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-19-2023, 07:24 PM by 3rdgensooner.)
(06-19-2023, 06:36 PM)maize Wrote: Quote:"Let’s face it. When you have RFK Jr. and Joe Rogan and Elon Musk all tag-teaming, those tres hombres at the same time ... That probably includes just about every follower on Twitter. So, it’s pretty overwhelming," Hotez said.
Quote:quote:
Hotez tweeted Sunday night he has no plans to debate Kennedy, even with all the harassment he's received.
"Science is not something that is typically debated like say 18th enlightenment philosophy or political issues," he said
Science is not something that is typically debated. LMAO. That is correct. You present your evidence for review by the entire community. You do not blather nonsense like Kennedy and expect to be taken seriously. No reason to cave in because the idiots are hooting and hollering.
(06-19-2023, 07:07 PM)maize Wrote: Quote: <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Compilation of his advice.
2 shots, 3 shots, 4 shots, 5 shots, yearly shots, and every few months shots.
He absolutely needs to be cross-examined.
If you can't trust a highly edited compilation by racket.news, who can you trust?
(06-19-2023, 06:36 PM)maize Wrote: Quote:"Let’s face it. When you have RFK Jr. and Joe Rogan and Elon Musk all tag-teaming, those tres hombres at the same time ... That probably includes just about every follower on Twitter. So, it’s pretty overwhelming," Hotez said.
Quote:quote:
Hotez tweeted Sunday night he has no plans to debate Kennedy, even with all the harassment he's received.
"Science is not something that is typically debated like say 18th enlightenment philosophy or political issues," he said
Science is not something that is typically debated. LMAO.
To a large extent, the scientific community has done this to themselves over the last five or 10 years. People used to trust them, and now they don't because so many things have become politicized.
Posts: 10,443
Threads: 244
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
30
(06-19-2023, 07:29 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-19-2023, 07:07 PM)maize Wrote: Quote: <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Compilation of his advice.
2 shots, 3 shots, 4 shots, 5 shots, yearly shots, and every few months shots.
He absolutely needs to be cross-examined.
If you can't trust a highly edited compilation by racket.news, who can you trust?
He didn’t say those things? How many shots have you had?
Posts: 18,390
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
(06-19-2023, 07:36 PM)maize Wrote: (06-19-2023, 07:29 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-19-2023, 07:07 PM)maize Wrote: Quote: <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Compilation of his advice.
2 shots, 3 shots, 4 shots, 5 shots, yearly shots, and every few months shots.
He absolutely needs to be cross-examined.
If you can't trust a highly edited compilation by racket.news, who can you trust?
He didn’t say those things? How many shots have you had? What difference does it make?
|
