Gunplay at Phoenix Hyatt Regency this weekend

[Hightop77]

You post about very selective truths: crimes committed by black people.  You don't post about crime in general..  THAT is the truth.

You prove my point.  Blacks so dominate most criminal numbers, especially violent crime, it's no different than crime in general.  Remove black violent crime from our statistics and our country is as safe as any country in Europe.  Black crime is what makes the USA a dangerous place to live.  For example in Chicago and NYC, remove black violent crime from the numbers and you eliminate 90% of the violent crime.  Shall I go on?

The FBI tracks about 28 crimes, if I recall.  Whites lead in every category except 3.

And on a per capita basis they lead in none of them.

Yes, but in some cases you're talking about hundreds of thousands more crimes committed by whitee in a single category.  So  why are you concerned about 100k incidents and not 300k incidents?

But you are talking about one or two categories including property crimes.  The obvious focus is on violent crime.

[Beastdog]

I post the truth wherever I can because the media refuses to do so and most people are completely misinformed.  They believe that blacks are horribly persecuted and racism holds them down.  Why would any moral decent person object to the truth being told when 99% of what people otherwise hear is a blatant lie?  That's an actual question.

You post about very selective truths: crimes committed by black people.  You don't post about crime in general..  THAT is the truth.

You prove my point.  Blacks so dominate most criminal numbers, especially violent crime, it's no different than crime in general.  Remove black violent crime from our statistics and our country is as safe as any country in Europe.  Black crime is what makes the USA a dangerous place to live.  For example in Chicago and NYC, remove black violent crime from the numbers and you eliminate 90% of the violent crime.  Shall I go on?

The FBI tracks about 28 crimes, if I recall.  Whites lead in every category except 3.

And on a per capita basis they lead in none of them.

Don't you remember that discussion, HT? P1tchblack has the math skills of a 9 year old. He probably doesn't know what the term "per capita" means.

[Hightop77]

You post about very selective truths: crimes committed by black people.  You don't post about crime in general..  THAT is the truth.

You prove my point.  Blacks so dominate most criminal numbers, especially violent crime, it's no different than crime in general.  Remove black violent crime from our statistics and our country is as safe as any country in Europe.  Black crime is what makes the USA a dangerous place to live.  For example in Chicago and NYC, remove black violent crime from the numbers and you eliminate 90% of the violent crime.  Shall I go on?

The FBI tracks about 28 crimes, if I recall.  Whites lead in every category except 3.

And on a per capita basis they lead in none of them.

Don't you remember that discussion, HT? P1tchblack has the math skills of a 9 year old. He probably doesn't know what the term "per capita" means.

And sometimes he needs to be reminded of that.

[P1tchblack]

You prove my point.  Blacks so dominate most criminal numbers, especially violent crime, it's no different than crime in general.  Remove black violent crime from our statistics and our country is as safe as any country in Europe.  Black crime is what makes the USA a dangerous place to live.  For example in Chicago and NYC, remove black violent crime from the numbers and you eliminate 90% of the violent crime.  Shall I go on?

The FBI tracks about 28 crimes, if I recall.  Whites lead in every category except 3.

And on a per capita basis they lead in none of them.

Yes, but in some cases you're talking about hundreds of thousands more crimes committed by whitee in a single category.  So  why are you concerned about 100k incidents and not 300k incidents?

But you are talking about one or two categories including property crimes.  The obvious focus is on violent crime.

For obvious reasons, your focus is on violent crimes.

Based on the data below.... if you were able to magically erase all crimes (not the actual people) from one of the racial groups tracked by the FBI, which would you choose?

   
   

[Hightop77]

The FBI tracks about 28 crimes, if I recall.  Whites lead in every category except 3.

And on a per capita basis they lead in none of them.

Yes, but in some cases you're talking about hundreds of thousands more crimes committed by whitee in a single category.  So  why are you concerned about 100k incidents and not 300k incidents?

But you are talking about one or two categories including property crimes.  The obvious focus is on violent crime.

For obvious reasons, your focus is on violent crimes.

Based on the data below.... if you were able to magically erase all crimes (not the actual people) from one of the racial groups tracked by the FBI, which would you choose?

Blacks.  By doing so, the quality of life would drastically increase in nearly every city.

[P1tchblack]

And on a per capita basis they lead in none of them.

Yes, but in some cases you're talking about hundreds of thousands more crimes committed by whitee in a single category.  So  why are you concerned about 100k incidents and not 300k incidents?

But you are talking about one or two categories including property crimes.  The obvious focus is on violent crime.

For obvious reasons, your focus is on violent crimes.

Based on the data below.... if you were able to magically erase all crimes (not the actual people) from one of the racial groups tracked by the FBI, which would you choose?

Blacks.  By doing so, the quality of life would drastically increase in nearly every city.

So, in 2019, blacks committed about 400 more murders (4000 vs 3600) and about 4000 more robberies (29,000 vs 25,000).  It's a difference, but nothing terribly significant.  If given the choice, you would choose to keep all of these crimes, just to get rid of the crimes (not the actual peope themselves) committd more frequently by blacks to improve quality of life:

RAPE
White  11K
Black 4K

AG ASSAULT
White 169K
Black 91K

BURGLARY
White 81K
Black 34K

LARCENY-THEFT
White 393K
Black 178K

ARSON
White 4K
Black 1K

[Hightop77]

Yes, but in some cases you're talking about hundreds of thousands more crimes committed by whitee in a single category.  So  why are you concerned about 100k incidents and not 300k incidents?

But you are talking about one or two categories including property crimes.  The obvious focus is on violent crime.

For obvious reasons, your focus is on violent crimes.

Based on the data below.... if you were able to magically erase all crimes (not the actual people) from one of the racial groups tracked by the FBI, which would you choose?

Blacks.  By doing so, the quality of life would drastically increase in nearly every city.

So, in 2019, blacks committed about 400 more murders (4000 vs 3600) and about 4000 more robberies (29,000 vs 25,000).  It's a difference, but nothing terribly significant.  If given the choice, you would choose to keep all of these crimes, just to get rid of the crimes (not the actual peope themselves) committd more frequently by blacks to improve quality of life:

The official numbers don't even begin to tell the story.  For example, black murders are grossly understated and probably their other crime categories are too.  In Chicago for example, less than 15% of the murders are ever solved and thus never become part of the FBI statistical data.  The official numbers show blacks commit about 50% of all murders, which at 13% of the population would be bad enough.  In reality, the actual number could be anywhere from 60% to 90% because nearly all of the unsolved ones are your typical black drug/gang killing.

[P1tchblack]

But you are talking about one or two categories including property crimes.  The obvious focus is on violent crime.

For obvious reasons, your focus is on violent crimes.

Based on the data below.... if you were able to magically erase all crimes (not the actual people) from one of the racial groups tracked by the FBI, which would you choose?

Blacks.  By doing so, the quality of life would drastically increase in nearly every city.

So, in 2019, blacks committed about 400 more murders (4000 vs 3600) and about 4000 more robberies (29,000 vs 25,000).  It's a difference, but nothing terribly significant.  If given the choice, you would choose to keep all of these crimes, just to get rid of the crimes (not the actual peope themselves) committd more frequently by blacks to improve quality of life:

The official numbers don't even begin to tell the story.  For example, black murders are grossly understated and probably their other crime categories are too.  In Chicago for example, less than 15% of the murders are ever solved and thus never become part of the FBI statistical data.  The official numbers show blacks commit about 50% of all murders, which at 13% of the population would be bad enough.  In reality, the actual number could be anywhere from 60% to 90% because nearly all of the unsolved ones are your typical black drug/gang killing.

Those numbers are simply arrests, which means that the numbers could be inflated, also.  However, your assumptions aside, you would accept what i said above as a good idea to improve quality of life?

[Hightop77]

For obvious reasons, your focus is on violent crimes.

Based on the data below.... if you were able to magically erase all crimes (not the actual people) from one of the racial groups tracked by the FBI, which would you choose?

Blacks.  By doing so, the quality of life would drastically increase in nearly every city.

So, in 2019, blacks committed about 400 more murders (4000 vs 3600) and about 4000 more robberies (29,000 vs 25,000).  It's a difference, but nothing terribly significant.  If given the choice, you would choose to keep all of these crimes, just to get rid of the crimes (not the actual peope themselves) committd more frequently by blacks to improve quality of life:

The official numbers don't even begin to tell the story.  For example, black murders are grossly understated and probably their other crime categories are too.  In Chicago for example, less than 15% of the murders are ever solved and thus never become part of the FBI statistical data.  The official numbers show blacks commit about 50% of all murders, which at 13% of the population would be bad enough.  In reality, the actual number could be anywhere from 60% to 90% because nearly all of the unsolved ones are your typical black drug/gang killing.

Those numbers are simply arrests, which means that the numbers could be inflated, also.  However, your assumptions aside, you would accept what i said above as a good idea to improve quality of life?

How many of the top 50 most dangerous places in America don't have a significant black population?

[Blinky]

All races have violent idiots. It is usually a thin percentage of their overall population.

With the blacks it is just the opposite. Most are violent idiots, while a thin percentage are respectable people.

[P1tchblack]

Blacks.  By doing so, the quality of life would drastically increase in nearly every city.

So, in 2019, blacks committed about 400 more murders (4000 vs 3600) and about 4000 more robberies (29,000 vs 25,000).  It's a difference, but nothing terribly significant.  If given the choice, you would choose to keep all of these crimes, just to get rid of the crimes (not the actual peope themselves) committd more frequently by blacks to improve quality of life:

The official numbers don't even begin to tell the story.  For example, black murders are grossly understated and probably their other crime categories are too.  In Chicago for example, less than 15% of the murders are ever solved and thus never become part of the FBI statistical data.  The official numbers show blacks commit about 50% of all murders, which at 13% of the population would be bad enough.  In reality, the actual number could be anywhere from 60% to 90% because nearly all of the unsolved ones are your typical black drug/gang killing.

Those numbers are simply arrests, which means that the numbers could be inflated, also.  However, your assumptions aside, you would accept what i said above as a good idea to improve quality of life?

How many of the top 50 most dangerous places in America don't have a significant black population?

Was that a yes or no to my question?

[P1tchblack]

So, in 2019, blacks committed about 400 more murders (4000 vs 3600) and about 4000 more robberies (29,000 vs 25,000).  It's a difference, but nothing terribly significant.  If given the choice, you would choose to keep all of these crimes, just to get rid of the crimes (not the actual peope themselves) committd more frequently by blacks to improve quality of life:

The official numbers don't even begin to tell the story.  For example, black murders are grossly understated and probably their other crime categories are too.  In Chicago for example, less than 15% of the murders are ever solved and thus never become part of the FBI statistical data.  The official numbers show blacks commit about 50% of all murders, which at 13% of the population would be bad enough.  In reality, the actual number could be anywhere from 60% to 90% because nearly all of the unsolved ones are your typical black drug/gang killing.

Those numbers are simply arrests, which means that the numbers could be inflated, also.  However, your assumptions aside, you would accept what i said above as a good idea to improve quality of life?

How many of the top 50 most dangerous places in America don't have a significant black population?

Was that a yes or no to my question?

Maybe leastdog can answer the question since he is one of the two that is good at math

[Beastdog]

The official numbers don't even begin to tell the story.  For example, black murders are grossly understated and probably their other crime categories are too.  In Chicago for example, less than 15% of the murders are ever solved and thus never become part of the FBI statistical data.  The official numbers show blacks commit about 50% of all murders, which at 13% of the population would be bad enough.  In reality, the actual number could be anywhere from 60% to 90% because nearly all of the unsolved ones are your typical black drug/gang killing.

Those numbers are simply arrests, which means that the numbers could be inflated, also.  However, your assumptions aside, you would accept what i said above as a good idea to improve quality of life?

How many of the top 50 most dangerous places in America don't have a significant black population?

Was that a yes or no to my question?

Maybe leastdog can answer the question since he is one of the two that is good at math

ur dumb.