Is HERO pay in California considered socialism?

[davebucknut]

I'm a multi cultural loving nationalist who believes in meritocracy and I also believe in totally equality for every man, woman, child, race, or religion however all systems are based on merit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Hightop77]

I'm a multi cultural loving nationalist who believes in meritocracy and I also believe in totally equality for every man, woman, child, race, or religion however all systems are based on merit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

That means you don't believe in the American system as it stands today.  Clearly you oppose anti-racism and equity and therefore are a racist and maybe even a Nazi according to some here.

[K9Buck]

I'm a multi cultural loving nationalist who believes in meritocracy and I also believe in totally equality for every man, woman, child, race, or religion however all systems are based on merit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Well said.  I'm with you!

[zigbee]

I'm a multi cultural loving nationalist who believes in meritocracy and I also believe in totally equality for every man, woman, child, race, or religion however all systems are based on merit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

That means you don't believe in the American system as it stands today.  Clearly you oppose anti-racism and equity and therefore are a racist and maybe even a Nazi according to some here.

According to some is according to you.  I and others only respond to what you post.   So, no cat and mouse here.   If you don't want a single person in the nation but white people that is your business.  If you think that eliminates poverty, laziness, crime, drug abuse, violence, savages, out of wedlock children, and makes for a perfect and harmonious existence well, you are not be honest.  But that is your business.  I don't really care what people on here think.

[Hightop77]

[davebucknut]

I'm a multi cultural loving nationalist who believes in meritocracy and I also believe in totally equality for every man, woman, child, race, or religion however all systems are based on merit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Well said.  I'm with you!

I think its the only system that can be implemented in America because we already have such a diverse nation to begin with, so we aren't changing that, but we can tell everyone to STFU and earn their way.

Sure lefties will still cry about it, but they cry over everything.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Georgem80]

He likes or is fascist so he doesnâ€t like the comparison.

Huh?  

3rd Gen is right.  Hightop identifies with Hitler regime, agrees with NAZI Aryan madness, and hates Jews, Catholics, Blacks, Hispanics...he always argues that Fascists are tops.  Surprised you have not noticed this by now.   Nationalism is fine, I don't have an issue with people supporting their country at all.  But he wants a pure nation of just white people, no immigration and no one other than whites.

Just like the Founding Fathers so I am in good company.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790 ) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person[s] ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in a number of states.

They still used leaches lol. Enlightened for the time, but they werenâ€t the most high information group in our history.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Hightop77]

He likes or is fascist so he doesnâ€t like the comparison.

Huh?  

3rd Gen is right.  Hightop identifies with Hitler regime, agrees with NAZI Aryan madness, and hates Jews, Catholics, Blacks, Hispanics...he always argues that Fascists are tops.  Surprised you have not noticed this by now.   Nationalism is fine, I don't have an issue with people supporting their country at all.  But he wants a pure nation of just white people, no immigration and no one other than whites.

Just like the Founding Fathers so I am in good company.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790 ) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person[s] ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in a number of states.

They still used leaches lol. Enlightened for the time, but they werenâ€t the most high information group in our history. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean unlike the enlightened people of today who subscribe to the Magic Dirt Theory, which claims if you put black children in white schools they will be just as intelligent and well behaved as the white children?  Or that children should choose their own "gender"?  Actually leeches are used today by the medical profession in certain applications.

[Georgem80]

Huh?  

3rd Gen is right.  Hightop identifies with Hitler regime, agrees with NAZI Aryan madness, and hates Jews, Catholics, Blacks, Hispanics...he always argues that Fascists are tops.  Surprised you have not noticed this by now.   Nationalism is fine, I don't have an issue with people supporting their country at all.  But he wants a pure nation of just white people, no immigration and no one other than whites.

Just like the Founding Fathers so I am in good company.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790 ) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person[s] ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in a number of states.

They still used leaches lol. Enlightened for the time, but they werenâ€t the most high information group in our history. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean unlike the enlightened people of today who subscribe to the Magic Dirt Theory, which claims if you put black children in white schools they will be just as intelligent and well behaved as the white children?  Or that children should choose their own "gender"?  Actually leeches are used today by the medical profession in certain applications.

What youâ€re describing is over enlightened without process skills. Terrible combination.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ChinaBuck]

Having nitpicking discussions about whether something is fascist or communistic isn't helpful to our cause, because either are bad and both describe to DNC.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

This is a good point as what is being practiced is really a bit of an amalgam. Both are deeply out of alignment with true conservative principles.

[davebucknut]

Having nitpicking discussions about whether something is fascist or communistic isn't helpful to our cause, because either are bad and both describe to DNC.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

This is a good point as what is being practiced is really a bit of an amalgam. Both are deeply out of alignment with true conservative principles.

Remember that fascism or communism from the past doesn't mean that new forms of them can't be slightly different, because history doesn't necessarily mean that its going to repeat itself word for word, but it will rhyme with it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Hightop77]

Having nitpicking discussions about whether something is fascist or communistic isn't helpful to our cause, because either are bad and both describe to DNC.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

This is a good point as what is being practiced is really a bit of an amalgam.  Both are deeply out of alignment with true conservative principles.

Remember that fascism or communism from the past doesn't mean that new forms of them can't be slightly different, because history doesn't necessarily mean that its going to repeat itself word for word, but it will rhyme with it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Massive difference between the two in terms of control.  Fascist countries don't have to build walls to keep people from leaving.  In fact, citizens are often happy.  Franco is still a good example.  The Leftists hated him but most people in Spain supported his leadership, nationalism and traditional values.

[wydileie]

Communism and fascism are two sides of the same coin. Just look at China. They moved from communism to fascism, and no one really even noticed.