Some great news regarding AOC

[P1tchblack]

People are ignoring her ideas.

AOC among most ineffective lawmakers in Congress, according to study

Among all Democratic lawmakers, AOC was ranked 230th out of 2040 Congressional Democrats in terms of effectiveness.

A study has found that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democratic member of Congress from New York City and a young face in the party, has not been an effective politician in the legislature, based on a survey from the nonpartisan Center for Effective Lawmaking.
Ocasio- Cortez, popularly known as AOC , introduced a total of 21 “substantive” bills that did not receive substantial backing from other lawmakers, including committee and floor votes, according to the study, a project of Vanderbilt University and the University of Virginia.

More

https://m.jpost.com/american-politics/ao...udy-664063

[Alabuckeye]

She's a pretty face that says controversial things, and has the ear of the media. She's the Kim Kardashian of the HoR. For those worried that she will be Speaker of the House in the next 3-4, yeah....no.

[Hightop77]

Well duh ...  .  Of course using that meaningless standard she was "ineffective" when the GOP controlled the House or Senate.  Unfortunately she is one of the commies in the Democrat Party pushing their agenda now.  Much of the phony infrastructure plan has her fingerprints all over it.  And obviously she pushed for and supported many of Biden's insane EO's like shutting down the oil pipeline.  I would say she has been very effective in pushing Pelosi further to the Left.

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

[Syncro]

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

He doesn't have the ability to think critically, about anything.

This analysis/ranking is totally irrelevant in terms of measuring her real impact on the Democratic members in the House and the DNC in general.

[P1tchblack]

Well duh ...  .  Of course using that meaningless standard she was "ineffective" when the GOP controlled the House or Senate.  Unfortunately she is one of the commies in the Democrat Party pushing their agenda now.  Much of the phony infrastructure plan has her fingerprints all over it.  And obviously she pushed for and supported many of Biden's insane EO's like shutting down the oil pipeline.  I would say she has been very effective in pushing Pelosi further to the Left.

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

I'm "swallowing"  something based on measurable facts.  Other than hyperbole and fear mongering, what do you have to support YOUR assertion?

[Hightop77]

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

He doesn't have the ability to think critically, about anything.

This analysis/ranking is totally irrelevant in terms of measuring her real impact on the Democratic members in the House and the DNC in general.

Definitely below average.  Just a parrot.

[Blinky]

Being ranked 230th out of 2040 would not be an indication of a bad ranking for effectiveness. Either the OP is really bad at math, or he can't even copy pasta without somehow inserting typos.

[Hightop77]

Well duh ...  .  Of course using that meaningless standard she was "ineffective" when the GOP controlled the House or Senate.  Unfortunately she is one of the commies in the Democrat Party pushing their agenda now.  Much of the phony infrastructure plan has her fingerprints all over it.  And obviously she pushed for and supported many of Biden's insane EO's like shutting down the oil pipeline.  I would say she has been very effective in pushing Pelosi further to the Left.

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

I'm "swallowing"  something based on measurable facts.  Other than hyperbole and fear mongering, what do you have to support YOUR assertion?

"Measurable facts" that are completely meaningless in determining actual effectiveness.  Anyone who thinks AOC, Omar, Presley, etc have not been effective in moving their party to edge of socialism is a fool. Obviously they are media darlings which makes their job easy.

[P1tchblack]

Well duh ...  .  Of course using that meaningless standard she was "ineffective" when the GOP controlled the House or Senate.  Unfortunately she is one of the commies in the Democrat Party pushing their agenda now.  Much of the phony infrastructure plan has her fingerprints all over it.  And obviously she pushed for and supported many of Biden's insane EO's like shutting down the oil pipeline.  I would say she has been very effective in pushing Pelosi further to the Left.

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

I'm "swallowing"  something based on measurable facts.  Other than hyperbole and fear mongering, what do you have to support YOUR assertion?

"Measurable facts" that are completely meaningless in determining actual effectiveness. 

Only for the irrational.

Anyone who thinks AOC, Omar, Presley, etc have not been effective in moving their party to edge of socialism is a fool. Obviously they are media darlings which makes their job easy.

So, as I asked preciously, what facts/data do you have to support that?

[P1tchblack]

Being ranked 230th out of 2040 would not be an indication of a bad ranking for effectiveness. Either the OP is really bad at math, or he can't even copy pasta without somehow inserting typos.

Open the link, dunce

[Hightop77]

Well duh ...  .  Of course using that meaningless standard she was "ineffective" when the GOP controlled the House or Senate.  Unfortunately she is one of the commies in the Democrat Party pushing their agenda now.  Much of the phony infrastructure plan has her fingerprints all over it.  And obviously she pushed for and supported many of Biden's insane EO's like shutting down the oil pipeline.  I would say she has been very effective in pushing Pelosi further to the Left.

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

I'm "swallowing"  something based on measurable facts.  Other than hyperbole and fear mongering, what do you have to support YOUR assertion?

"Measurable facts" that are completely meaningless in determining actual effectiveness. 

Only for the irrational.


You of all people really want to go there? 

Anyone who thinks AOC, Omar, Presley, etc have not been effective in moving their party to edge of socialism is a fool. Obviously they are media darlings which makes their job easy.

So, as I asked preciously, what facts/data do you have to support that?


Completely self evident unless you are low information.

[P1tchblack]

Well duh ...  .  Of course using that meaningless standard she was "ineffective" when the GOP controlled the House or Senate.  Unfortunately she is one of the commies in the Democrat Party pushing their agenda now.  Much of the phony infrastructure plan has her fingerprints all over it.  And obviously she pushed for and supported many of Biden's insane EO's like shutting down the oil pipeline.  I would say she has been very effective in pushing Pelosi further to the Left.

This is another example of how Pitchblack quickly swallows something without questioning it.

I'm "swallowing"  something based on measurable facts.  Other than hyperbole and fear mongering, what do you have to support YOUR assertion?

"Measurable facts" that are completely meaningless in determining actual effectiveness. 

Only for the irrational.


You of all people really want to go there? 

Anyone who thinks AOC, Omar, Presley, etc have not been effective in moving their party to edge of socialism is a fool. Obviously they are media darlings which makes their job easy.

So, as I asked preciously, what facts/data do you have to support that?


Completely self evident unless you are low information.

I didn't think you had anything. Thanks for confirming.

[Georgem80]

Being ranked 230th out of 2040 would not be an indication of a bad ranking for effectiveness. Either the OP is really bad at math, or he can't even copy pasta without somehow inserting typos.

This is what I thought. Still wondering if itâ€s bad or it should be rated for ineffectiveness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[unc4corners]

She's a pretty face that says controversial things, and has the ear of the media.  She's the Kim Kardashian of the HoR.  For those worried that she will be Speaker of the House in the next 3-4, yeah....no.

I see nothing attractive about her.  Nothing.
She's never made me look twice at her ever.  I can see how she could be to some but she's just not my type I guess.

[Hightop77]

I'm "swallowing"  something based on measurable facts.  Other than hyperbole and fear mongering, what do you have to support YOUR assertion?

"Measurable facts" that are completely meaningless in determining actual effectiveness. 

Only for the irrational.


You of all people really want to go there? 

Anyone who thinks AOC, Omar, Presley, etc have not been effective in moving their party to edge of socialism is a fool. Obviously they are media darlings which makes their job easy.

So, as I asked preciously, what facts/data do you have to support that?


Completely self evident unless you are low information.

I didn't think you had anything. Thanks for confirming.

Have what?  Your post has already been thoroughly debunked which is the norm here.