Posts: 5,353
Threads: 19
Joined: Sep 2020
Reputation:
26
(12-15-2020, 06:01 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: Term limits in the house can be easily done by stopping gerrymandering. No more Jim Jordan or Sheila Jackson Lee districts. Straight up grid. Only crooked lines allowed are natural borders. That will give you natural term limits.Â
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk That is not feasible, as parts of the grid would represent way more people than other parts of the grid. Like it or not, gerrymandering is necessary, to a degree, because you need to even out populations represented by a single Congressman. That is why you get these crazy districts that meander all over the place. Yes, some of it is drawn very purposefully to maximize seats held by one party, but it isn't so simple to fix.
Posts: 8,389
Threads: 311
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
33
(12-15-2020, 06:01 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: Term limits in the house can be easily done by stopping gerrymandering. No more Jim Jordan or Sheila Jackson Lee districts. Straight up grid. Only crooked lines allowed are natural borders. That will give you natural term limits.Â
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No, this won't come close to eliminating the need for term limits. Probably wouldn't address it at all.
It may have already been posted, but here are the results from the forensic analysis:
https://www.9and10news.com/content/uploa...DACTED.pdf
Posts: 1,268
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
9
(12-15-2020, 10:24 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: It may have already been posted, but here are the results from the forensic analysis:
https://www.9and10news.com/content/uploa...DACTED.pdf
Can you explain this document to me? I TOTALLY understand it, I just want to make sure you do.
(12-15-2020, 10:31 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: (12-15-2020, 10:24 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: It may have already been posted, but here are the results from the forensic analysis:
https://www.9and10news.com/content/uploa...DACTED.pdf
Can you explain this document to me? I TOTALLY understand it, I just want to make sure you do.
I doubt it!
The one thing that wasn't clarified with the 60%+ error rate is whether it favored Trump or Biden (the one table seems to show it favored Trump) or if the error rate is being assumed to be an excuse to adjudicate ballots, which opens the door for actual fraud.
Posts: 5,353
Threads: 19
Joined: Sep 2020
Reputation:
26
(12-15-2020, 10:31 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: (12-15-2020, 10:24 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: It may have already been posted, but here are the results from the forensic analysis:
https://www.9and10news.com/content/uploa...DACTED.pdf
Can you explain this document to me? I TOTALLY understand it, I just want to make sure you do. There were quite a few red flags brought up in this document. These are the highlights: - The system responsible for maintaining and tabulating votes was not secure. It was missing critical security updates and Anti-virus updates dating back several years. The election software was also unsecured on a USB drive in a random person's drawer. This opens it up to potential exploitation
- The logs for the voting system were mysteriously missing for all dates prior to two days AFTER the election, stopping any real ability to effectively perform forensic analysis on the vote itself
- 68.5% of ballot entries were flagged as errors, which means they were sent to adjudication where there is no oversight, and any one with system access could change the votes with virtually no accountability
- Voting machine software was updated shortly before the election (against the law), and a couple days after the election (against the law). The update after the election changed 81.96% of ballots in some manner.
- The updated software (after the election) was used for the certified vote counts for the townships after the 81.96% of ballots were changed by the software
Posts: 1,268
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
9
Thanks for the clarification.
Is this real or just some crackpots wannabe scenario? DOes this document have any sort of legitimacy?
Posts: 5,353
Threads: 19
Joined: Sep 2020
Reputation:
26
(12-15-2020, 11:27 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: Thanks for the clarification.
Is this real or just some crackpots wannabe scenario? DOes this document have any sort of legitimacy? No idea.
(12-15-2020, 11:47 AM)wydileie Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:27 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: Thanks for the clarification.
Is this real or just some crackpots wannabe scenario? DOes this document have any sort of legitimacy? No idea.
The question we are all asking isn't how much potential there is for fraud, but how much ACTUAL fraud exists. Republicans have been claiming voter fraud for decades and, while there are small amounts of fraud here and there, there has never been evidence of the election-changing, centrally coordinated fraud being claimed.
Posts: 21,357
Threads: 250
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
81
(12-15-2020, 12:48 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:47 AM)wydileie Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:27 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: Thanks for the clarification.
Is this real or just some crackpots wannabe scenario? DOes this document have any sort of legitimacy? No idea.
The question we are all asking isn't how much potential there is for fraud, but how much ACTUAL fraud exists. Republicans have been claiming voter fraud for decades and, while there are small amounts of fraud here and there, there has never been evidence of the election-changing, centrally coordinated fraud being claimed. Maybe that's what the $200m+ that Trump has raised since 11/3/2020 will be spent on......
No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
(12-15-2020, 12:57 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: (12-15-2020, 12:48 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:47 AM)wydileie Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:27 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: Thanks for the clarification.
Is this real or just some crackpots wannabe scenario? DOes this document have any sort of legitimacy? No idea.
The question we are all asking isn't how much potential there is for fraud, but how much ACTUAL fraud exists. Republicans have been claiming voter fraud for decades and, while there are small amounts of fraud here and there, there has never been evidence of the election-changing, centrally coordinated fraud being claimed. Maybe that's what the $200m+ that Trump has raised since 11/3/2020 will be spent on......
according to Trump's websites where he collects the money for his legal fees, 60% of that money goes toward paying off campaign debt.
Posts: 1,268
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
9
(12-15-2020, 12:57 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: (12-15-2020, 12:48 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:47 AM)wydileie Wrote: (12-15-2020, 11:27 AM)Conanthelibrarian Wrote: Thanks for the clarification.
Is this real or just some crackpots wannabe scenario? DOes this document have any sort of legitimacy? No idea.
The question we are all asking isn't how much potential there is for fraud, but how much ACTUAL fraud exists. Republicans have been claiming voter fraud for decades and, while there are small amounts of fraud here and there, there has never been evidence of the election-changing, centrally coordinated fraud being claimed. Maybe that's what the $200m+ that Trump has raised since 11/3/2020 will be spent on......
I cant believe that Americans have sent him 200 million dollars AFTER he lost. Is that real? The guy is a BILLIONAIRE, let him spend his own money.
|