11-22-2020, 12:21 AM
Why not some Irrational numbers or square roots to mix it up?
"Don't, I say don't bother me dog, can't ya see I'm thinkin'?" Foghorn Leghorn
Welcome to the zigbeenuthouse!!! Our discussion board has topics on ALL Sports and teams from college to pros, Reds, Buckeyes, Bengals, Browns, Food, US politics, religion, news, AND MORE! You MUST register with an acct. to post here. The access to read as non member is open. Please register and gain an acct. with user name to post and ENJOY this site. (June 11, 2019)
Quote of the day: A positive outlook is what leads to positive results.
WELCOME new member AMaizawing (April 03, 2020)
#0 is the stupidest number ever
|
11-22-2020, 12:21 AM
Why not some Irrational numbers or square roots to mix it up?
"Don't, I say don't bother me dog, can't ya see I'm thinkin'?" Foghorn Leghorn
11-22-2020, 12:27 AM
(11-21-2020, 10:44 PM)dkeener67 Wrote:I think you guys went a little too far and applied it to other things. I was simply watching CFB and noticed the 0 multiple times. I think it is a stupid number to wear. It can be your favorite team too, the 0 looks like garbage on all jerseys too.(11-21-2020, 09:54 PM)unc4corners Wrote: I hunt with a 30.06.Gotta ask maize. That aught designation I always thought was unusual for that caliber. Nobody says 19 aught 6 for 1906, when that cartridge was designed. However it does sound better than 30 oh six. But then bullet/cartridge nomenclature is its own animal.
11-22-2020, 12:31 AM
1
11-22-2020, 10:32 AM
(11-21-2020, 10:44 PM)dkeener67 Wrote:Something I've never forgotten was a friends grandfather in about 1960 said 19 aught (? don't remember the last number) when referring to a year in the first decade. I've never forgotten that and it was the only time I remember someone using that term. Probably more common in the early years of that century.(11-21-2020, 09:54 PM)unc4corners Wrote: I hunt with a 30.06.Gotta ask maize. That aught designation I always thought was unusual for that caliber. Nobody says 19 aught 6 for 1906, when that cartridge was designed. However it does sound better than 30 oh six. But then bullet/cartridge nomenclature is its own animal.
11-22-2020, 02:59 PM
(11-22-2020, 10:32 AM)dunefan Wrote:That would make perfect sense for a 30.06.(11-21-2020, 10:44 PM)dkeener67 Wrote:Something I've never forgotten was a friends grandfather in about 1960 said 19 aught (? don't remember the last number) when referring to a year in the first decade. I've never forgotten that and it was the only time I remember someone using that term. Probably more common in the early years of that century.(11-21-2020, 09:54 PM)unc4corners Wrote: I hunt with a 30.06.Gotta ask maize. That aught designation I always thought was unusual for that caliber. Nobody says 19 aught 6 for 1906, when that cartridge was designed. However it does sound better than 30 oh six. But then bullet/cartridge nomenclature is its own animal. Quote:Hard times make hard men.
11-22-2020, 03:01 PM
(11-21-2020, 11:17 PM)sparky454 Wrote: I don't see 0 as a stupid number. Let's throw in -1, -10 or -87, now that would be dumb.3.14 42Â nothing will top He Hate Me though. Don't need a number with that name. Quote:Hard times make hard men.
11-22-2020, 03:30 PM
11-22-2020, 05:38 PM
1 is the loneliest number.
"Don't, I say don't bother me dog, can't ya see I'm thinkin'?" Foghorn Leghorn
11-22-2020, 06:21 PM
Make America Honest Again
11-22-2020, 07:41 PM
Double naught.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|