***BREAKING*** SYNCRO may be right on the VIRUS coming from lab in CHINA *****

[3rdgensooner]

Intelligent analysis as always. No lies though so it's better than most of your posts.
There's additional research since the paper above. That includes preliminary findings that SARS CoV2 may have spread into people twice independently as there were two strains initially that do not seem to have derived from each other. Pending further work. Also strains of coronavirus closer to SARS CoV2 have been isolated from bats in Laos this year.

Like I said, it is likely state propaganda through their studies that work to protect China and the NIH. Other studies I've read and seen say differently.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Here you go. "Studies". The read and seen part is interesting. When you've just "seen" a study does that mean you didn't read it?

[davebucknut]

Intelligent analysis as always. No lies though so it's better than most of your posts.
There's additional research since the paper above. That includes preliminary findings that SARS CoV2 may have spread into people twice independently as there were two strains initially that do not seem to have derived from each other. Pending further work. Also strains of coronavirus closer to SARS CoV2 have been isolated from bats in Laos this year.

Like I said, it is likely state propaganda through their studies that work to protect China and the NIH. Other studies I've read and seen say differently.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Here you go. "Studies". The read and seen part is interesting. When you've just "seen" a study does that mean you didn't read it?

Lots of studies have shown success with already available drugs, but you shun them.

Some studies have shown that covid can't be passed to a bat, but you claim it innocently came from bats.

Also the statistics do not even come close to equalling the fear and drug pushing that you and your cohorts demand, but yet here we are.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[3rdgensooner]

Intelligent analysis as always. No lies though so it's better than most of your posts.
There's additional research since the paper above. That includes preliminary findings that SARS CoV2 may have spread into people twice independently as there were two strains initially that do not seem to have derived from each other. Pending further work. Also strains of coronavirus closer to SARS CoV2 have been isolated from bats in Laos this year.

Like I said, it is likely state propaganda through their studies that work to protect China and the NIH. Other studies I've read and seen say differently.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Here you go. "Studies". The read and seen part is interesting. When you've just "seen" a study does that mean you didn't read it?

Lots of studies have shown success with already available drugs, but you shun them.

Some studies have shown that covid can't be passed to a bat, but you claim it innocently came from bats.

Also the statistics do not even come close to equalling the fear and drug pushing that you and your cohorts demand, but yet here we are.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

None of what you posted would accurately represent anything I've posted or said but that's par for the course with you. Dishonesty and poor reading skills are a bad combination. 
Post them then.

[Beastdog]

Hey, I thought you two cats had worked out your differences and were all ready to be buddies. What the hells happened?

[Soupcity Kid]

Was the gubmt report given today.   It sounded like the movie "12 Angry Men".   They gave us  a ***** burger.  A few leaning towards lab leak, a few leaning towards a bat cane and a few just aren't sure and say unless China fesses up we will never know.

[3rdgensooner]

The government? The scientists will get a good idea of what happened. Government workers will have their fingers in their noses.