Banning Tik Tok is like banning the BBC

[P1tchB7ack]

China considers selling TikTok U.S. operations to Musk, Bloomberg reports

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/13/china-co...berg-.html

Yea, I saw. Your masters in the swamp will be pi**ed if it goes to Musk. Lol.

So.  They were pissed when he was considering buying Twitter.  Did they stop it from happening?  Could they stop it from happening?  Nope.  In  fact, a Delaware judge, appointed by Democratic governor John Carney, actually ruled that Elon has to buy it.

Sorry to ruin your conspiracy theories.

[Hightop77]

[url=

The Tiktok ban was first considered over “Chinese spying” concerns before Trump left office in 2020.

Then it was shelved until the beginning of 2024 when it became very urgent all of a sudden ? pic.twitter.com/j8ix4rRE8C

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) January 13, 2025

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/url]

[Alabuckeye]

Nick Fuentes. That tells you a lot right there

[Hightop77]

Nick Fuentes. That tells you a lot right there

You disagree with his information or just attacking him for personal reasons?

[Alabuckeye]

Nick Fuentes. That tells you a lot right there

You disagree with his information or just attacking him for personal reasons?

I’ve found Nick Fuentes to have a specific agenda in the past and to drive his conclusions to meet that agenda. Which imo, places any conclusion he makes in the suspect category

[Hightop77]

Nick Fuentes. That tells you a lot right there

You disagree with his information or just attacking him for personal reasons?

I’ve found Nick Fuentes to have a specific agenda in the past and to drive his conclusions to meet that agenda. Which imo, places any conclusion he makes in the suspect category

And who doesn't have specific agendas regarding their views?

[3rdgensooner]

It hasn't become "urgent all of a sudden". Dopey, pointless wat to put the situation but Fuentes is a moron. Just coming to a head. It's been an ongoing issue.

[Alabuckeye]

Nick Fuentes. That tells you a lot right there

You disagree with his information or just attacking him for personal reasons?

I’ve found Nick Fuentes to have a specific agenda in the past and to drive his conclusions to meet that agenda. Which imo, places any conclusion he makes in the suspect category

And who doesn't have specific agendas regarding their views?

Everyone has core beliefs which in many ways could be called ‘agendas’. That wasn’t my point though.  I’ll highlight the point.

[Hightop77]

Nick Fuentes. That tells you a lot right there

You disagree with his information or just attacking him for personal reasons?

I’ve found Nick Fuentes to have a specific agenda in the past and to drive his conclusions to meet that agenda. Which imo, places any conclusion he makes in the suspect category

And who doesn't have specific agendas regarding their views?

Everyone has core beliefs which in many ways could be called ‘agendas’. That wasn’t my point though.  I’ll highlight the point.

My response is the same.  People have positions and usually "drive conclusions" to meet the agenda.  That is nothing new and perfectly normal.  Some day you will learn not to trust our corrupt government.  Not sure I can say the same for 3rdgen.  

[Alabuckeye]

We shouldn’t couch facts to prove a point. One should use facts to lead to a correct conclusion.

[Hightop77]

We shouldn’t couch facts to prove a point. One should use facts to lead to a correct conclusion.

Of course, but that would assume no human bias and that is not a valid assumption.

[lrrps21]

The folks at Renmin University AKA PLA/CCP training grounds had a bad week. It's losing tik tok and the Biden Administration.