The Jew hatred of Christ and His people has no end ...

[Hightop77]

Florida high school employee complains about Bible verse on co-worker's parking space: 'It's attacking me'

An instructional assistant at a Florida high school has reportedly complained about her co-worker's parking space that quotes a verse from the New Testament, saying it offends her as Jewish person.

Marina Gentilesco, who works at Wiregrass Ranch High School in Pasco County, Florida, said she has been angered every day she passed by her co-worker's parking spot that is painted with Philippians 4:13, which reads, "I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me," according to local Fox affiliate Fox 59.

"I feel like itâ€s attacking me as a Jew," she said, according to the outlet.


full story ...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-high-...58892.html

[P1tchblack]

I don't much care about the person claiming to be attacked, but why would a government employee think it's ok to put a bible verse on their parking spot.

[Hightop77]

I don't much care about the person claiming to be attacked, but why would a government employee think it's ok to put a bible verse on their parking spot.

A public proclamation of their faith possibly?  Are you with the Jews and the Jew-brained who want to ban him from doing so?

[P1tchblack]

I don't much care about the person claiming to be attacked, but why would a government employee think it's ok to put a bible verse on their parking spot.

A public proclamation of their faith possibly?  Are you with the Jews and the Jew-brained who want to ban him from doing so?

I'm with the Constitution and multiple SCOTUS rulings.  The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing the parking spot in question is on public school property. I wouldn't support Old Testament verses by Jews, New Testament verses by Christians, Quran quotes by Muslims, Book of Mormon quotes by Mormons, etc.

Seems pretty straight forward to me, regardless of the ridiculous dramatics and hyperbole by the Jewish person.

[Hightop77]

I don't much care about the person claiming to be attacked, but why would a government employee think it's ok to put a bible verse on their parking spot.

A public proclamation of their faith possibly?  Are you with the Jews and the Jew-brained who want to ban him from doing so?

I'm with the Constitution and multiple SCOTUS rulings.  The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing the parking spot in question is on public school property. I wouldn't support Old Testament verses by Jews, New Testament verses by Christians, Quran quotes by Muslims, Book of Mormon quotes by Mormons, etc.

Seems pretty straight forward to me, regardless of the ridiculous dramatics and hyperbole by the Jewish person.

Not a single Founding Father would agree with that.  The idea of separating the government from America's national religion of Christianity never entered their mind.  None of that was conceivable until Jews starting exploiting our court system because of their insatiable hatred of Christ.

[P1tchblack]

I don't much care about the person claiming to be attacked, but why would a government employee think it's ok to put a bible verse on their parking spot.

A public proclamation of their faith possibly?  Are you with the Jews and the Jew-brained who want to ban him from doing so?

I'm with the Constitution and multiple SCOTUS rulings.  The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing the parking spot in question is on public school property. I wouldn't support Old Testament verses by Jews, New Testament verses by Christians, Quran quotes by Muslims, Book of Mormon quotes by Mormons, etc.

Seems pretty straight forward to me, regardless of the ridiculous dramatics and hyperbole by the Jewish person.

Not a single Founding Father would agree with that.  The idea of separating the government from America's national religion of Christianity never entered their mind.  None of that was conceivable until Jews starting exploiting our court system because of their insatiable hatred of Christ.

Even if you're right, which is debatable, the current SCOTUS rulings, as was the case with abortion, are in place and it seems pretty clear that sticking a Bible verse on your parking spot, in a public school parking lot, would very, very, very likely not be permitted.... in addition to possibly being vandalism.

If the topic were to get to SCOTUS today, we may be back to school prayer for most of the deep south and mid west but, for now, there's no reason to believe that what she did is Constitutional.

[Hightop77]

I don't much care about the person claiming to be attacked, but why would a government employee think it's ok to put a bible verse on their parking spot.

A public proclamation of their faith possibly?  Are you with the Jews and the Jew-brained who want to ban him from doing so?

I'm with the Constitution and multiple SCOTUS rulings.  The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing the parking spot in question is on public school property. I wouldn't support Old Testament verses by Jews, New Testament verses by Christians, Quran quotes by Muslims, Book of Mormon quotes by Mormons, etc.

Seems pretty straight forward to me, regardless of the ridiculous dramatics and hyperbole by the Jewish person.

Not a single Founding Father would agree with that.  The idea of separating the government from America's national religion of Christianity never entered their mind.  None of that was conceivable until Jews starting exploiting our court system because of their insatiable hatred of Christ.

Even if you're right, which is debatable, the current SCOTUS rulings, as was the case with abortion, are in place and it seems pretty clear that sticking a Bible verse on your parking spot, in a public school parking lot, would very, very, very likely not be permitted.... in addition to possibly being vandalism.

If the topic were to get to SCOTUS today, we may be back to school prayer for most of the deep south and mid west but, for now, there's no reason to believe that what she did is Constitutional.

That isn't true at all.  The school itself was not involved and there was no funding involved.  The school might have the ability to stop him from doing it as a policy issue but absent from that, it is clearly his right to do.

[P1tchblack]

A public proclamation of their faith possibly?  Are you with the Jews and the Jew-brained who want to ban him from doing so?

I'm with the Constitution and multiple SCOTUS rulings.  The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing the parking spot in question is on public school property. I wouldn't support Old Testament verses by Jews, New Testament verses by Christians, Quran quotes by Muslims, Book of Mormon quotes by Mormons, etc.

Seems pretty straight forward to me, regardless of the ridiculous dramatics and hyperbole by the Jewish person.

Not a single Founding Father would agree with that.  The idea of separating the government from America's national religion of Christianity never entered their mind.  None of that was conceivable until Jews starting exploiting our court system because of their insatiable hatred of Christ.

Even if you're right, which is debatable, the current SCOTUS rulings, as was the case with abortion, are in place and it seems pretty clear that sticking a Bible verse on your parking spot, in a public school parking lot, would very, very, very likely not be permitted.... in addition to possibly being vandalism.

If the topic were to get to SCOTUS today, we may be back to school prayer for most of the deep south and mid west but, for now, there's no reason to believe that what she did is Constitutional.

That isn't true at all.  The school itself was not involved and there was no funding involved.  The school might have the ability to stop him from doing it as a policy issue but absent from that, it is clearly his right to do.

With very few exceptions, you can't have Bible verses, 10 commandments, crosses, etc on public property.  Those actions have been repeatedly ruled to be in violation of the Establishment Clause.  A teacher couldn't go out and buy her own cross and hang it in her classroom, either.  A teacher CAN, as a matter of personal expression of faith, wear a cross necklace, I believe.

[Hightop77]

I'm with the Constitution and multiple SCOTUS rulings.  The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing the parking spot in question is on public school property. I wouldn't support Old Testament verses by Jews, New Testament verses by Christians, Quran quotes by Muslims, Book of Mormon quotes by Mormons, etc.

Seems pretty straight forward to me, regardless of the ridiculous dramatics and hyperbole by the Jewish person.

Not a single Founding Father would agree with that.  The idea of separating the government from America's national religion of Christianity never entered their mind.  None of that was conceivable until Jews starting exploiting our court system because of their insatiable hatred of Christ.

Even if you're right, which is debatable, the current SCOTUS rulings, as was the case with abortion, are in place and it seems pretty clear that sticking a Bible verse on your parking spot, in a public school parking lot, would very, very, very likely not be permitted.... in addition to possibly being vandalism.

If the topic were to get to SCOTUS today, we may be back to school prayer for most of the deep south and mid west but, for now, there's no reason to believe that what she did is Constitutional.

That isn't true at all.  The school itself was not involved and there was no funding involved.  The school might have the ability to stop him from doing it as a policy issue but absent from that, it is clearly his right to do.

With very few exceptions, you can't have Bible verses, 10 commandments, crosses, etc on public property.  Those actions have been repeatedly ruled to be in violation of the Establishment Clause.  A teacher couldn't go out and buy her own cross and hang it in her classroom, either.  A teacher CAN, as a matter of personal expression of faith, wear a cross necklace, I believe.

 Please cite that court ruling.

[P1tchblack]

Not a single Founding Father would agree with that.  The idea of separating the government from America's national religion of Christianity never entered their mind.  None of that was conceivable until Jews starting exploiting our court system because of their insatiable hatred of Christ.

Even if you're right, which is debatable, the current SCOTUS rulings, as was the case with abortion, are in place and it seems pretty clear that sticking a Bible verse on your parking spot, in a public school parking lot, would very, very, very likely not be permitted.... in addition to possibly being vandalism.

If the topic were to get to SCOTUS today, we may be back to school prayer for most of the deep south and mid west but, for now, there's no reason to believe that what she did is Constitutional.

That isn't true at all.  The school itself was not involved and there was no funding involved.  The school might have the ability to stop him from doing it as a policy issue but absent from that, it is clearly his right to do.

With very few exceptions, you can't have Bible verses, 10 commandments, crosses, etc on public property.  Those actions have been repeatedly ruled to be in violation of the Establishment Clause.  A teacher couldn't go out and buy her own cross and hang it in her classroom, either.  A teacher CAN, as a matter of personal expression of faith, wear a cross necklace, I believe.

 Please cite that court ruling.

There are several rulings on Establishment/Religion in schools. Which specific item do you want a court ruling about?

[Hightop77]

Even if you're right, which is debatable, the current SCOTUS rulings, as was the case with abortion, are in place and it seems pretty clear that sticking a Bible verse on your parking spot, in a public school parking lot, would very, very, very likely not be permitted.... in addition to possibly being vandalism.

If the topic were to get to SCOTUS today, we may be back to school prayer for most of the deep south and mid west but, for now, there's no reason to believe that what she did is Constitutional.

That isn't true at all.  The school itself was not involved and there was no funding involved.  The school might have the ability to stop him from doing it as a policy issue but absent from that, it is clearly his right to do.

With very few exceptions, you can't have Bible verses, 10 commandments, crosses, etc on public property.  Those actions have been repeatedly ruled to be in violation of the Establishment Clause.  A teacher couldn't go out and buy her own cross and hang it in her classroom, either.  A teacher CAN, as a matter of personal expression of faith, wear a cross necklace, I believe.

 Please cite that court ruling.

There are several rulings on Establishment/Religion in schools. Which specific item do you want a court ruling about?

What ruling prohibits Bible verses on public property?

[P1tchblack]

That isn't true at all.  The school itself was not involved and there was no funding involved.  The school might have the ability to stop him from doing it as a policy issue but absent from that, it is clearly his right to do.

With very few exceptions, you can't have Bible verses, 10 commandments, crosses, etc on public property.  Those actions have been repeatedly ruled to be in violation of the Establishment Clause.  A teacher couldn't go out and buy her own cross and hang it in her classroom, either.  A teacher CAN, as a matter of personal expression of faith, wear a cross necklace, I believe.

 Please cite that court ruling.

There are several rulings on Establishment/Religion in schools. Which specific item do you want a court ruling about?

What ruling prohibits Bible verses on public property?

Ok, so you're trying to differentiate 10 commandments (which is from Bible verses) with other Bible verses specifically?

[Hightop77]

With very few exceptions, you can't have Bible verses, 10 commandments, crosses, etc on public property.  Those actions have been repeatedly ruled to be in violation of the Establishment Clause.  A teacher couldn't go out and buy her own cross and hang it in her classroom, either.  A teacher CAN, as a matter of personal expression of faith, wear a cross necklace, I believe.

 Please cite that court ruling.

There are several rulings on Establishment/Religion in schools. Which specific item do you want a court ruling about?

What ruling prohibits Bible verses on public property?

Ok, so you're trying to differentiate 10 commandments (which is from Bible verses) with other Bible verses specifically?

Not necessarily.  You made the assertion.  What ruling bans Bible verses on public property? 

None of this is related to what is constitutional at this point.  This is about a Christ hating Jew wanting Christianity to be literally banned from the country.

[P1tchblack]

https://www.christianpost.com/news/judge...sroom.html

https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2013...3KXbnbMLAQ

In Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom in the state violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment because the purpose of the display was essentially religious.

[Hightop77]

https://www.christianpost.com/news/judge...sroom.html

https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2013...3KXbnbMLAQ

In Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom in the state violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment because the purpose of the display was essentially religious.

Has nothing to do with this issue.  The school is not requiring him to put a Bible verse on his personal parking space.  It was his decision with no school involvement.