As predicted ...

[zigbee]

In New York state, it is now a felony to carry any firearm in:

(a) any place owned or under the control of federal, state or local government, for the purpose of government administration, including courts;

(b) any location providing health, behavioral health, or chemical dependance care or services;

© any place of worship or religious observation;

(d) libraries, public playgrounds, public parks, and zoos;

(e) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, funded, or approved by the office of children and family services that provides services to children, youth, or young adults, any legally exempt childcare provider; a childcare program for which a permit to operate such program has been issued by the department of health and mental hygiene pursuant to the health code of the city of New York;

(f) nursery schools, preschools, and summer camps;

(g) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office for people with developmental disabilities;

(h) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by office of addiction services and supports;

(i) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office of mental health;

(j) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office of temporary and disability assistance;

(k) homeless shelters, runaway homeless youth shelters, family shelters, shelters for adults, domestic violence shelters, and emergency shelters, and residential programs for victims of domestic violence;

(l) residential settings licensed, certified, regulated, funded, or operated by the department of health;

(m) in or upon any building or grounds, owned or leased, of any educational institutions, colleges and universities, licensed private career schools, school districts, public schools, private schools licensed under article one hundred one of the education law, charter schools, non-public schools, board of cooperative educational services, special act schools, preschool special education programs, private residential or non-residential schools for the education of students with disabilities, and any state-operated or state-supported schools;

(n) any place, conveyance, or vehicle used for public transportation or public transit, subway cars, train cars, buses, ferries, railroad, omnibus, marine or aviation transportation; or any facility used for or in connection with service in the transportation of passengers, airports, train stations, subway and rail stations, and bus terminals;

(o) any establishment issued a license for on-premise consumption pursuant to article four, four-A, five, or six of the alcoholic beverage control law where alcohol is consumed and any establishment licensed under article four of the cannabis law for on-premise consumption;

(p) any place used for the performance, art entertainment, gaming, or sporting events such as theaters, stadiums, racetracks, museums, amusement parks, performance venues, concerts, exhibits, conference centers, banquet halls, and gaming facilities and video lottery terminal facilities as licensed by the gaming commission;

(q) any location being used as a polling place;

® any public sidewalk or other public area restricted from general public access for a limited time or special event that has been issued a permit for such time or event by a governmental entity, or subject to specific, heightened law enforcement protection, or has otherwise had such access restricted by a governmental entity, provided such location is identified as such by clear and conspicuous signage;

(s) any gathering of individuals to collectively express their constitutional rights to protest or assemble;

(t) the area commonly known as Times Square, as such area is determined and identified by the city of New York; provided such area shall be clearly and conspicuously identified with signage.

So, citizens canâ€t exercise their constitutional right to arms at church, or, ironically, even at a protest of the diminishment of their right to bear arms.  The list of prohibited places goes on and on and on.

It isn't worth the legal risk to even try.  You could easily be in violation of the law and not even realize it.

Exactly, the way they wrote it, you could be walking on a public sidewalk and easily fall into one of these categories just for being out in front of one of these places.

But in 5-10 years scotus "might" pick it up and "maybe" will rule correctly.

Bammer and Zig are pounding their chests and brushing it off though.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?  Hell, you don't even live in NY but you and HT are obsessed with this.............incredible.  This will be struck down.

[davebucknut]

In New York state, it is now a felony to carry any firearm in:

(a) any place owned or under the control of federal, state or local government, for the purpose of government administration, including courts;

(b) any location providing health, behavioral health, or chemical dependance care or services;

© any place of worship or religious observation;

(d) libraries, public playgrounds, public parks, and zoos;

(e) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, funded, or approved by the office of children and family services that provides services to children, youth, or young adults, any legally exempt childcare provider; a childcare program for which a permit to operate such program has been issued by the department of health and mental hygiene pursuant to the health code of the city of New York;

(f) nursery schools, preschools, and summer camps;

(g) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office for people with developmental disabilities;

(h) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by office of addiction services and supports;

(i) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office of mental health;

(j) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office of temporary and disability assistance;

(k) homeless shelters, runaway homeless youth shelters, family shelters, shelters for adults, domestic violence shelters, and emergency shelters, and residential programs for victims of domestic violence;

(l) residential settings licensed, certified, regulated, funded, or operated by the department of health;

(m) in or upon any building or grounds, owned or leased, of any educational institutions, colleges and universities, licensed private career schools, school districts, public schools, private schools licensed under article one hundred one of the education law, charter schools, non-public schools, board of cooperative educational services, special act schools, preschool special education programs, private residential or non-residential schools for the education of students with disabilities, and any state-operated or state-supported schools;

(n) any place, conveyance, or vehicle used for public transportation or public transit, subway cars, train cars, buses, ferries, railroad, omnibus, marine or aviation transportation; or any facility used for or in connection with service in the transportation of passengers, airports, train stations, subway and rail stations, and bus terminals;

(o) any establishment issued a license for on-premise consumption pursuant to article four, four-A, five, or six of the alcoholic beverage control law where alcohol is consumed and any establishment licensed under article four of the cannabis law for on-premise consumption;

(p) any place used for the performance, art entertainment, gaming, or sporting events such as theaters, stadiums, racetracks, museums, amusement parks, performance venues, concerts, exhibits, conference centers, banquet halls, and gaming facilities and video lottery terminal facilities as licensed by the gaming commission;

(q) any location being used as a polling place;

® any public sidewalk or other public area restricted from general public access for a limited time or special event that has been issued a permit for such time or event by a governmental entity, or subject to specific, heightened law enforcement protection, or has otherwise had such access restricted by a governmental entity, provided such location is identified as such by clear and conspicuous signage;

(s) any gathering of individuals to collectively express their constitutional rights to protest or assemble;

(t) the area commonly known as Times Square, as such area is determined and identified by the city of New York; provided such area shall be clearly and conspicuously identified with signage.

So, citizens canâ€t exercise their constitutional right to arms at church, or, ironically, even at a protest of the diminishment of their right to bear arms.  The list of prohibited places goes on and on and on.

It isn't worth the legal risk to even try.  You could easily be in violation of the law and not even realize it.

Exactly, the way they wrote it, you could be walking on a public sidewalk and easily fall into one of these categories just for being out in front of one of these places.

But in 5-10 years scotus "might" pick it up and "maybe" will rule correctly.

Bammer and Zig are pounding their chests and brushing it off though.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?  Hell, you don't even live in NY but you and HT are obsessed with this.............incredible.  This will be struck down.

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[davebucknut]

Here is a video of ATF Agents going door to door looking for recently banned gun accessories.

I would be worried about it, but since Youngkin got elected in Virginia, I can rest easy knowing that the republic has been saved.




Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[wydileie]

This will take months, at most, for a federal court to strike it down. It doesn't have to be the SCOTUS, that's just where the ultimate decision will be made if and when NY wants to appeal it up the chain. They know the ultimate outcome if it makes it to the SCOTUS, though, so they are just wasting their taxpayers' money for no reason.

[davebucknut]

This will take months, at most, for a federal court to strike it down. It doesn't have to be the SCOTUS, that's just where the ultimate decision will be made if and when NY wants to appeal it up the chain. They know the ultimate outcome if it makes it to the SCOTUS, though, so they are just wasting their taxpayers' money for no reason.

My hope is that this will ultimately strike down all gun free zones

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[zigbee]

In New York state, it is now a felony to carry any firearm in:

(a) any place owned or under the control of federal, state or local government, for the purpose of government administration, including courts;

(b) any location providing health, behavioral health, or chemical dependance care or services;

© any place of worship or religious observation;

(d) libraries, public playgrounds, public parks, and zoos;

(e) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, funded, or approved by the office of children and family services that provides services to children, youth, or young adults, any legally exempt childcare provider; a childcare program for which a permit to operate such program has been issued by the department of health and mental hygiene pursuant to the health code of the city of New York;

(f) nursery schools, preschools, and summer camps;

(g) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office for people with developmental disabilities;

(h) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by office of addiction services and supports;

(i) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office of mental health;

(j) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office of temporary and disability assistance;

(k) homeless shelters, runaway homeless youth shelters, family shelters, shelters for adults, domestic violence shelters, and emergency shelters, and residential programs for victims of domestic violence;

(l) residential settings licensed, certified, regulated, funded, or operated by the department of health;

(m) in or upon any building or grounds, owned or leased, of any educational institutions, colleges and universities, licensed private career schools, school districts, public schools, private schools licensed under article one hundred one of the education law, charter schools, non-public schools, board of cooperative educational services, special act schools, preschool special education programs, private residential or non-residential schools for the education of students with disabilities, and any state-operated or state-supported schools;

(n) any place, conveyance, or vehicle used for public transportation or public transit, subway cars, train cars, buses, ferries, railroad, omnibus, marine or aviation transportation; or any facility used for or in connection with service in the transportation of passengers, airports, train stations, subway and rail stations, and bus terminals;

(o) any establishment issued a license for on-premise consumption pursuant to article four, four-A, five, or six of the alcoholic beverage control law where alcohol is consumed and any establishment licensed under article four of the cannabis law for on-premise consumption;

(p) any place used for the performance, art entertainment, gaming, or sporting events such as theaters, stadiums, racetracks, museums, amusement parks, performance venues, concerts, exhibits, conference centers, banquet halls, and gaming facilities and video lottery terminal facilities as licensed by the gaming commission;

(q) any location being used as a polling place;

® any public sidewalk or other public area restricted from general public access for a limited time or special event that has been issued a permit for such time or event by a governmental entity, or subject to specific, heightened law enforcement protection, or has otherwise had such access restricted by a governmental entity, provided such location is identified as such by clear and conspicuous signage;

(s) any gathering of individuals to collectively express their constitutional rights to protest or assemble;

(t) the area commonly known as Times Square, as such area is determined and identified by the city of New York; provided such area shall be clearly and conspicuously identified with signage.

So, citizens canâ€t exercise their constitutional right to arms at church, or, ironically, even at a protest of the diminishment of their right to bear arms.  The list of prohibited places goes on and on and on.

It isn't worth the legal risk to even try.  You could easily be in violation of the law and not even realize it.

Exactly, the way they wrote it, you could be walking on a public sidewalk and easily fall into one of these categories just for being out in front of one of these places.

But in 5-10 years scotus "might" pick it up and "maybe" will rule correctly.

Bammer and Zig are pounding their chests and brushing it off though.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?  Hell, you don't even live in NY but you and HT are obsessed with this.............incredible.  This will be struck down.

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

[davebucknut]

It isn't worth the legal risk to even try.  You could easily be in violation of the law and not even realize it.

Exactly, the way they wrote it, you could be walking on a public sidewalk and easily fall into one of these categories just for being out in front of one of these places.

But in 5-10 years scotus "might" pick it up and "maybe" will rule correctly.

Bammer and Zig are pounding their chests and brushing it off though.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?  Hell, you don't even live in NY but you and HT are obsessed with this.............incredible.  This will be struck down.

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[zigbee]

Exactly, the way they wrote it, you could be walking on a public sidewalk and easily fall into one of these categories just for being out in front of one of these places.

But in 5-10 years scotus "might" pick it up and "maybe" will rule correctly.

Bammer and Zig are pounding their chests and brushing it off though.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?  Hell, you don't even live in NY but you and HT are obsessed with this.............incredible.  This will be struck down.

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

[davebucknut]

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong?  Hell, you don't even live in NY but you and HT are obsessed with this.............incredible.  This will be struck down.

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[dunefan]

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'd like for you to read what you just wrote and explain exactly the parts that make any sense at all.  You pull more batschitt crazy stuff from your anus and type it all on here so we all can see how crazy you really are.  Pathetic.

[davebucknut]

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'd like for you to read what you just wrote and explain exactly the parts that make any sense at all.  You pull more batschitt crazy stuff from your anus and type it all on here so we all can see how crazy you really are.  Pathetic.

I see nothing wrong with it, a president must make decisions for what is best for the totality of his nation, not only to protect old people.

You'll never change my mind.


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[dunefan]

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'd like for you to read what you just wrote and explain exactly the parts that make any sense at all.  You pull more batschitt crazy stuff from your anus and type it all on here so we all can see how crazy you really are.  Pathetic.

I see nothing wrong with it, a president must make decisions for what is best for the totality of his nation, not only to protect old people.

You'll never change my mind.


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Wow.  Another senseless post.  Well done!

[davebucknut]

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'd like for you to read what you just wrote and explain exactly the parts that make any sense at all.  You pull more batschitt crazy stuff from your anus and type it all on here so we all can see how crazy you really are.  Pathetic.

I see nothing wrong with it, a president must make decisions for what is best for the totality of his nation, not only to protect old people.

You'll never change my mind.


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Wow.  Another senseless post.  Well done!

Yeah sorry Dune, but you make weak emotional arguments.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[zigbee]

It might get struck down in 5-10 years, maybe.

Unlike you zig I care about all of my fellow Americans, not just those that live in red states.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You don't give ONE DAMN about anyone and you said it RIGHT HERE with the comment on sacrificing people 70 and older over COVID 19 restriction so that is a lie.

I care about others but I don't feel sorry for those in NY who vote in fools that pass laws like this.  That law is unconstitutional and will be struck down.

I care a lot about everyone, but I'm also realistic, we destroyed our society to make ridiculous and ineffective policies to protect 70+ year olds.

So it was a poor choice of words, but my stance on covid has been consistent since day 1.

Tell old and sick people yo be extra vigilant, wear an N95 mask if they wanted, take some additional precautions in retirement homes, but everyone else should've lived their lives as if nothing happened.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So, you are so REALISTIC you want to kill 70 year olds...........got it.

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

HUH?????????  Those decisions were to protect the MOST VULNERABLE in terms of health issues?  Are you Andrew Cuomo?  He just threw sick people in rest homes..........were you good with that?  Sounds like you support that.  What does that have to do with not carrying a gun in NY into a church?   Amazing how you can top strange and really stupid posts with even WORSE stupid posts.

[dunefan]

Yep thats what I said zig, you got me man.

News flash, a president cannot ONLY worry about 70+ year olds, he has to make decisions based on what is best for ALL of his populace.

You guys are just selfish and said, to heck with everyone under the age of 60, only make decisions on how to protect the elderly.

Why so selfish? Haven't the boomers been given enough in their lifetimes?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'd like for you to read what you just wrote and explain exactly the parts that make any sense at all.  You pull more batschitt crazy stuff from your anus and type it all on here so we all can see how crazy you really are.  Pathetic.

I see nothing wrong with it, a president must make decisions for what is best for the totality of his nation, not only to protect old people.

You'll never change my mind.


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Wow.  Another senseless post.  Well done!

Yeah sorry Dune, but you make weak emotional arguments.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'm really not sure what you're reading.  I'm not arguing with you.  I'm  simply pointing out that your musings make no sense.  I keep saying read more and post less.  I think that advice will serve you well.