Nothing I'm going to say is going to make sense unless there is agreement on one fact:Â
There is currently no proof that the election was stolen. Â
There are a number of theories on how it could have been stolen, and those theories have been covered at nauseam but, as of today, there has not been a sufficient number of fraudulent ballots found to overturn the results of the election. That being the case, there is no basis for anyone to claim, as fact, that the election was stolen.
On the way to work today, I was listening to Ben Shapiro's podcast about MaL/FBI warrant situation and he's talking about how unprecedented all of this is and that there really isn't a strong case for any of the crimes being linked to Trump's possession of the documents. Literally, as I'm listening to that, I see the article about the DOJ's subpeona for documents from the National Archives (the one I posted in the MaL thread), that are allegedly same docs that were requested by the J6 committee. So, is this all about J6? We don't know for sure.
Other things I've read talk about what a dangerous precedent it would set to try to indict a former president, especially one who is also likely to be the main opponent of the current president in 2024. But, you can't indict him when he's IN office either, so are we supposed to accept that Presidents are legally untouchable?
My point? There are no good options with Trump. What's worse, banning the President of the United States from one of THE biggest social media platforms or allowing him to continue to spread dangerous disinformation to people who believe his every word? Dangerous to the point that it has caused violence - yes, J6 doesn't happen without Trump spreading disinformation about a stolen election.
So, now it looks like this whole MaL thing might just be a fishing expedition to find anything "bad" and/or more J6 info, AND possibly misusing the FBI to go after a political opponent. That is a huge issue. On the other hand, if there is NO accountability for Trump spreading dangerous lies, undermining our democracy and causing the J6 riot, then what's to prevent him, or future presidents, from doing it again? Â
Again, no good options with this guy.
Posts: 15,177
Threads: 267
Joined: May 2020
Reputation:
32
The election was 100% stolen, it was fraudulent in many many ways and the results NEVER should have been held.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Posts: 21,619
Threads: 253
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
30
(08-18-2022, 11:13 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The election was 100% stolen, it was fraudulent in many many ways and the results NEVER should have been held.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk I confess. I laughed out loud. You literally proved his point…..which is difficult
No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
Posts: 27,289
Threads: 478
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
Great, another troll thread.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
Posts: 2,618
Threads: 27
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
9
Will not read your garbage.
1
Posts: 3,341
Threads: 44
Joined: Sep 2021
Reputation:
4
(08-18-2022, 11:00 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: Nothing I'm going to say is going to make sense unless there is agreement on one fact:Â
There is currently no proof that the election was stolen. Â
There are a number of theories on how it could have been stolen, and those theories have been covered at nauseam but, as of today, there has not been a sufficient number of fraudulent ballots found to overturn the results of the election. That being the case, there is no basis for anyone to claim, as fact, that the election was stolen.
On the way to work today, I was listening to Ben Shapiro's podcast about MaL/FBI warrant situation and he's talking about how unprecedented all of this is and that there really isn't a strong case for any of the crimes being linked to Trump's possession of the documents. Literally, as I'm listening to that, I see the article about the DOJ's subpeona for documents from the National Archives (the one I posted in the MaL thread), that are allegedly same docs that were requested by the J6 committee. So, is this all about J6? We don't know for sure.
Other things I've read talk about what a dangerous precedent it would set to try to indict a former president, especially one who is also likely to be the main opponent of the current president in 2024. But, you can't indict him when he's IN office either, so are we supposed to accept that Presidents are legally untouchable?
My point? There are no good options with Trump. What's worse, banning the President of the United States from one of THE biggest social media platforms or allowing him to continue to spread dangerous disinformation to people who believe his every word? Dangerous to the point that it has caused violence - yes, J6 doesn't happen without Trump spreading disinformation about a stolen election.
So, now it looks like this whole MaL thing might just be a fishing expedition to find anything "bad" and/or more J6 info, AND possibly misusing the FBI to go after a political opponent. That is a huge issue. On the other hand, if there is NO accountability for Trump spreading dangerous lies, undermining our democracy and causing the J6 riot, then what's to prevent him, or future presidents, from doing it again? Â
Again, no good options with this guy. We don†t need proof.  We saw them changing the rules without the proper process.  The outcome is therefore “stolenâ€
Posts: 2,618
Threads: 27
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
9
Pitch you are turning into 3VFredo.
1
Posts: 15,177
Threads: 267
Joined: May 2020
Reputation:
32
(08-18-2022, 11:14 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:13 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The election was 100% stolen, it was fraudulent in many many ways and the results NEVER should have been held.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk I confess. I laughed out loud. You literally proved his point…..which is difficult The bellwether counties & states such as Ohio.
Biden won the fewest counties nationally.
Trump got higher percentages of black and latino votes.
We also saw a ton of evidence.
I'm sorry that none of it was taken seriously because of threats and back room payouts, but those are the facts
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
(08-18-2022, 11:45 AM)TroyKidd Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:00 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: Nothing I'm going to say is going to make sense unless there is agreement on one fact:Â
There is currently no proof that the election was stolen. Â
There are a number of theories on how it could have been stolen, and those theories have been covered at nauseam but, as of today, there has not been a sufficient number of fraudulent ballots found to overturn the results of the election. That being the case, there is no basis for anyone to claim, as fact, that the election was stolen.
On the way to work today, I was listening to Ben Shapiro's podcast about MaL/FBI warrant situation and he's talking about how unprecedented all of this is and that there really isn't a strong case for any of the crimes being linked to Trump's possession of the documents. Literally, as I'm listening to that, I see the article about the DOJ's subpeona for documents from the National Archives (the one I posted in the MaL thread), that are allegedly same docs that were requested by the J6 committee. So, is this all about J6? We don't know for sure.
Other things I've read talk about what a dangerous precedent it would set to try to indict a former president, especially one who is also likely to be the main opponent of the current president in 2024. But, you can't indict him when he's IN office either, so are we supposed to accept that Presidents are legally untouchable?
My point? There are no good options with Trump. What's worse, banning the President of the United States from one of THE biggest social media platforms or allowing him to continue to spread dangerous disinformation to people who believe his every word? Dangerous to the point that it has caused violence - yes, J6 doesn't happen without Trump spreading disinformation about a stolen election.
So, now it looks like this whole MaL thing might just be a fishing expedition to find anything "bad" and/or more J6 info, AND possibly misusing the FBI to go after a political opponent. That is a huge issue. On the other hand, if there is NO accountability for Trump spreading dangerous lies, undermining our democracy and causing the J6 riot, then what's to prevent him, or future presidents, from doing it again? Â
Again, no good options with this guy. We donâ€t need proof.  We saw them changing the rules without the proper process.  The outcome is therefore “stolenâ€
Right, neither did Trump. That's the issue. He repeatedly claimed something as fact without proof and not something insignificant. Something hugely important to most any American.
1
Posts: 5,842
Threads: 106
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
25
(08-18-2022, 11:46 AM)Dzone1 Wrote: Pitch you are turning into 3VFredo. He's been Fredo for a long time. But the world needs zookinni polishing fools too.
Quote:Hard times make hard men.
Hard men make easy times.Â
Easy times make soft men.Â
Soft men make hard times.
Posts: 21,619
Threads: 253
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
30
(08-18-2022, 11:48 AM)davebucknut Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:14 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:13 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The election was 100% stolen, it was fraudulent in many many ways and the results NEVER should have been held.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk I confess. I laughed out loud. You literally proved his point…..which is difficult The bellwether counties & states such as Ohio.
Biden won the fewest counties nationally.
Trump got higher percentages of black and latino votes.
We also saw a ton of evidence.
I'm sorry that none of it was taken seriously because of threats and back room payouts, but those are the facts
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk Democrats have been losing the counties for decades….
none of the rest of that indicates any sense of fraud.Â
im not saying fraud didn†t exist. I†m saying that when the idea is loudly stated, the known facts underlying it are not detailed at all, and are largely bluster
No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
Posts: 27,289
Threads: 478
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
(08-18-2022, 12:00 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:48 AM)davebucknut Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:14 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote: (08-18-2022, 11:13 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The election was 100% stolen, it was fraudulent in many many ways and the results NEVER should have been held.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk I confess. I laughed out loud. You literally proved his point…..which is difficult The bellwether counties & states such as Ohio.
Biden won the fewest counties nationally.
Trump got higher percentages of black and latino votes.
We also saw a ton of evidence.
I'm sorry that none of it was taken seriously because of threats and back room payouts, but those are the facts
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk Democrats have been losing the counties for decades….
none of the rest of that indicates any sense of fraud.Â
im not saying fraud didnâ€t exist. Iâ€m saying that when the idea is loudly stated, the known facts underlying it are not detailed at all, and are largely bluster
There is more than enough evidence to indicate that a substantial fraud occurred in several states. Â Unfortunately it would take a large and concentrated FBI investigation to complete the evidence gathering. Â Trying to do so through private lawsuits is almost impossible. Â As the saying goes there is proving and there is knowing. Â The DOJ and FBI punted away their responsibilities purposefully because they have zero interest in getting to the truth. Â They are literally in the pocket of Perkins Coie, the perpetrators of the fraud.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
Posts: 21,619
Threads: 253
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
30
Whatâ€s funny is that one side, after screaming for 4 years that foreigners had hacked our election, suddenly claim that this was the safest election eva….bar none.
The other side is screaming fraud for 5 years, even when they won, and even when folks on their side say “hey, weâ€ve looked into this fraud claim here in our state and thereâ€s nothing to itâ€.
No one wants to look outside their preconceived notion, and will beat those that do about the head and shoulders and make all sorts of accusations about them.
No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
1
(08-18-2022, 12:26 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: Whatâ€s funny is that one side, after screaming for 4 years that foreigners had hacked our election, suddenly claim that this was the safest election eva….bar none.
The other side is screaming fraud for 5 years, even when they won, and even when folks on their side say “hey, weâ€ve looked into this fraud claim here in our state and thereâ€s nothing to itâ€.
No one wants to look outside their preconceived notion, and will beat those that do about the head and shoulders and make all sorts of accusations about them. Hacked or interfered in?
|