07-11-2022, 06:53 PM
(07-11-2022, 06:25 PM)K9Buck Wrote:(07-11-2022, 05:41 AM)Georgem80 Wrote:(07-10-2022, 10:49 PM)TcSoup Wrote:(07-10-2022, 10:29 PM)Georgem80 Wrote: I think some are missing he was actually employed as a retired General. If he wasnâ€t employed, he could post what he wanted without consequences.George, He is a civilian who is retired military . Yes he is employed by the Government doing near the same job he had done while in the military.Â
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So basically what you are implying is if you are employed by the Government in any capacity , A Public School system , or in a State job you must give up your right to free speech or opinion if your Opinion or free speech doesn't fall in line with the agenda.?
No. Iâ€m saying your right is limited more than private sector. Agendas? Thatâ€s a stupid word for what Iâ€m saying. Itâ€s about the trust of the people you serve.Â
So. An example. After Helsinki, a colleague put on Facebook “Iâ€d rather see taking a knee for the national anthem, than my President on his knees in front of Putinâ€. Politics/humor/sarcasm aside it was an inappropriate post for a teacher. Parents complained, and we removed him from campus. He came back two weeks later after an investigation and social media training.Â
Now for some out there. Iâ€m not saying this General was deserving of any kind of punishment. Iâ€m just saying itâ€s the reality public sector deals with. I honestly thought that was inferred. But, inference is a medium level thinking skill.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know a military guy that posted on Facebook about how President Biden was wrong to have his unsocial GSD at the White House. I think I'm going to report him to the party so that he can be silenced!
Was it done in an inappropriate manner ?
You are either really obtuse to my point or just being a chain yanker. Either way youâ€re not interested in discussion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk