Welcome to the zigbeenuthouse!!! Our discussion board has topics on ALL Sports and teams from college to pros, Reds, Buckeyes, Bengals, Browns, Food, US politics, religion, news, AND MORE! You MUST register with an acct. to post here. The access to read as non member is open. Please register and gain an acct. with user name to post and ENJOY this site. (June 11, 2019)

Quote of the day: A positive outlook is what leads to positive results.

WELCOME new member AMaizawing (April 03, 2020)


Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why scarlet/HT are right and 3rdgen/wydileie are wrong
#49
(06-24-2022, 09:23 AM)wydileie Wrote: Challenges are done by the states' themselves and Congress, not the VP.

Did I say that?  He didn't have to immediately certify the electors though.  If it was decided there was no there there then that would have been that
Reply
#50
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US.

You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
#51
Like it or not….challenges were made in Pennsylvania. And ran thru the courts. Prior to 1/6. Pence canâ€t supercede the court system.

I listened to my first half hour of hearings yesterday. interesting the claim, backed up, that Meadows and Trump were pushing the Italian spy satellite story with the DoJ to get them to act.

Further Trump promised Sydney Powell heâ€d make her a special counsel to look into the voter fraud allegations. Her direct testimony under deposition

No longer GroupThink 'woke'.  but it was fun while it lasted.
Reply
#52
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US.

You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

No longer GroupThink 'woke'.  but it was fun while it lasted.
Reply
#53
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US.

You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it.  That is why Pence needed to do so.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
#54
(06-24-2022, 09:24 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US. That would freak the country out and turn us into a banana republic if the VP of the losing candidate can just stop the election of a President of the opposite party.


I mentioned that scant look would have been better than nothing.  There was no time for a real remedy, but there were legit concerns at play.  Look at this committee.  They are freaked the #### out.  They don't want anyone to EVER have the audacity to challenge one of their stolen (my opinion) elections ever again.
Congress had the ability to challenge the results. They didn't have enough votes. End of story. Pence had no power.

Can you even imagine what you guys would think if Biden had suspended electors and not ratified them in 2016 to give time for investigations into fraud? Yeah, you would have been off your rocker. You would be on here spouting how it's time to grab our guns and march on Washington, and I may have agreed with you.
Reply
#55
(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US.

You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it.  That is why Pence needed to do so.
So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done something”. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions. 

nah. Not buying it. Pence isnâ€t at fault here

No longer GroupThink 'woke'.  but it was fun while it lasted.
Reply
#56
(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US.

You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it.  That is why Pence needed to do so.
So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done something”. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions. 

nah. Not buying it. Pence isnâ€t at fault here
Judges actually have ruled that Secretaries of State changed rules against the law. The judges just ruled you can't nullify votes because the government does something dumb.
Reply
#57
(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US.

You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it.  That is why Pence needed to do so.
So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done something”. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions. 

nah. Not buying it. Pence isnâ€t at fault here

The system failed because the Leftists don't care about protecting the integrity of it.  What was done by the Democrats including changing voting requirements and Zuckerberg spending half a billion dollars was extraordinary.  One side cannot limit itself to the old norms while the other side is dismantling the system to rig it.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
#58
(06-24-2022, 09:45 AM)wydileie Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it.  That is why Pence needed to do so.
So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done something”. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions. 

nah. Not buying it. Pence isnâ€t at fault here
Judges actually have ruled that Secretaries of State changed rules against the law. The judges just ruled you can't nullify votes because the government does something dumb.
In which states?

No longer GroupThink 'woke'.  but it was fun while it lasted.
Reply
#59
(06-24-2022, 09:58 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:45 AM)wydileie Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote: Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith

Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it.  That is why Pence needed to do so.
So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done something”. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions. 

nah. Not buying it. Pence isnâ€t at fault here
Judges actually have ruled that Secretaries of State changed rules against the law. The judges just ruled you can't nullify votes because the government does something dumb.
In which states?
I know they have in Penn, I think Wisky, as well.
Reply
#60
(06-24-2022, 09:39 AM)wydileie Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:24 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.

Even if he did, you are talking about a major change in procedure, the likes of which have never been seen in the US. That would freak the country out and turn us into a banana republic if the VP of the losing candidate can just stop the election of a President of the opposite party.


I mentioned that scant look would have been better than nothing.  There was no time for a real remedy, but there were legit concerns at play.  Look at this committee.  They are freaked the #### out.  They don't want anyone to EVER have the audacity to challenge one of their stolen (my opinion) elections ever again.
Congress had the ability to challenge the results. They didn't have enough votes. End of story. Pence had no power.

Can you even imagine what you guys would think if Biden had suspended electors and not ratified them in 2016 to give time for investigations into fraud? Yeah, you would have been off your rocker. You would be on here spouting how it's time to grab our guns and march on Washington, and I may have agreed with you.

2016 wasnâ€t 2020.  2020 was a legit sh1t show under the pretense of Covid
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Heads up Scarlet - New JFK Assassination Conspiracy Theory ChinaBuck 50 6,143 03-16-2024, 12:50 AM
Last Post: ScarletHayes
  Musk is correct, government positions attract a lot of the wrong people K9Buck 0 29 03-07-2024, 08:42 PM
Last Post: K9Buck
  So let's say I'm wrong and Trump wins the 24' election K9Buck 70 696 01-15-2024, 07:22 PM
Last Post: Hightop77
  Right turns and wrong turns in US history. ScarletHayes 22 408 12-09-2023, 12:33 AM
Last Post: stxbuck
  Hey 3rdGen K9Buck 27 504 08-15-2023, 09:08 AM
Last Post: lrrps21
  She's not wrong P1tchblack 7 170 06-28-2023, 11:57 AM
Last Post: ChinaBuck
  High school cheerleader shot in back after accidentally trying to open door of wrong K9Buck 5 143 04-23-2023, 07:28 PM
Last Post: stxbuck
  Police shoot and kill homeowner after going to the wrong house P1tchblack 21 477 04-19-2023, 07:47 PM
Last Post: ChinaBuck
  Songs you once credited to the wrong artist. ScarletHayes 27 551 03-21-2023, 12:37 PM
Last Post: TroyKidd
  Meghan (of couse spelled wrong) and Harry maize 5 149 02-23-2023, 09:51 PM
Last Post: Georgem80

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
https://www.facebook.com/Zigbeenuthousecom-425755324858973/?modal=admin_todo_tour