06-24-2022, 09:27 AM
Welcome to the zigbeenuthouse!!! Our discussion board has topics on ALL Sports and teams from college to pros, Reds, Buckeyes, Bengals, Browns, Food, US politics, religion, news, AND MORE! You MUST register with an acct. to post here. The access to read as non member is open. Please register and gain an acct. with user name to post and ENJOY this site. (June 11, 2019)
Quote of the day: A positive outlook is what leads to positive results.
WELCOME new member AMaizawing (April 03, 2020)
Why scarlet/HT are right and 3rdgen/wydileie are wrong
|
06-24-2022, 09:28 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
06-24-2022, 09:32 AM
Like it or not….challenges were made in Pennsylvania. And ran thru the courts. Prior to 1/6. Pence canâ€t supercede the court system.
I listened to my first half hour of hearings yesterday. interesting the claim, backed up, that Meadows and Trump were pushing the Italian spy satellite story with the DoJ to get them to act. Further Trump promised Sydney Powell heâ€d make her a special counsel to look into the voter fraud allegations. Her direct testimony under deposition No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
06-24-2022, 09:34 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
06-24-2022, 09:37 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. Probably but in a situation like that, no court is going to stop everything and get to the bottom of it. That is why Pence needed to do so.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
(06-24-2022, 09:24 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:Congress had the ability to challenge the results. They didn't have enough votes. End of story. Pence had no power.(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. Can you even imagine what you guys would think if Biden had suspended electors and not ratified them in 2016 to give time for investigations into fraud? Yeah, you would have been off your rocker. You would be on here spouting how it's time to grab our guns and march on Washington, and I may have agreed with you.
06-24-2022, 09:43 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done somethingâ€. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions.Â(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. nah. Not buying it. Pence isnâ€t at fault here No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
06-24-2022, 09:45 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:Judges actually have ruled that Secretaries of State changed rules against the law. The judges just ruled you can't nullify votes because the government does something dumb.(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done somethingâ€. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions.Â(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature.
06-24-2022, 09:46 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done somethingâ€. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions.Â(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. The system failed because the Leftists don't care about protecting the integrity of it. What was done by the Democrats including changing voting requirements and Zuckerberg spending half a billion dollars was extraordinary. One side cannot limit itself to the old norms while the other side is dismantling the system to rig it.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
06-24-2022, 09:58 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:45 AM)wydileie Wrote:In which states?(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:Judges actually have ruled that Secretaries of State changed rules against the law. The judges just ruled you can't nullify votes because the government does something dumb.(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done somethingâ€. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions.Â(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:28 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: You mean like how the Democrats changed voting procedures in various states to open the door for the cheating?Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith No longer GroupThink 'woke'. but it was fun while it lasted.
06-24-2022, 10:03 AM
(06-24-2022, 09:58 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:I know they have in Penn, I think Wisky, as well.(06-24-2022, 09:45 AM)wydileie Wrote:In which states?(06-24-2022, 09:43 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote:Judges actually have ruled that Secretaries of State changed rules against the law. The judges just ruled you can't nullify votes because the government does something dumb.(06-24-2022, 09:37 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:So, 20 months later we have no proof that the voting changes made in state legislatures (where the power belongs) were illegal. No think tank study , no Republican report. Yet we are going to ride a legal action, stipulated unethical for bad intent, and claim that Pence “should have done somethingâ€. Even when courts ruled 5 plus dozen times prior to his actions.Â(06-24-2022, 09:34 AM)Alabuckeye Wrote: Were the changes made to voting procedures by state legislatures(some Republican controlled) illegal?  I wonâ€t argue unethical because I believe it was pushed in bad faith
06-24-2022, 06:21 PM
(06-24-2022, 09:39 AM)wydileie Wrote:(06-24-2022, 09:24 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:Congress had the ability to challenge the results. They didn't have enough votes. End of story. Pence had no power.(06-24-2022, 09:22 AM)wydileie Wrote: There isn't even any agreement from Constitutional scholars that Pence had such power to deny electors. Seems most were leaning to no, he didn't, and that the VP's role is largely ceremonial in nature. 2016 wasnâ€t 2020.  2020 was a legit sh1t show under the pretense of Covid |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)