Welcome to the zigbeenuthouse!!! Our discussion board has topics on ALL Sports and teams from college to pros, Reds, Buckeyes, Bengals, Browns, Food, US politics, religion, news, AND MORE! You MUST register with an acct. to post here. The access to read as non member is open. Please register and gain an acct. with user name to post and ENJOY this site. (June 11, 2019)

Bring home national title BUCKEYES! (October 08, 2024)


Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
January 6
(06-14-2022, 11:31 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:24 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:19 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 10:30 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 10:11 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: Given that a significant number of people believe anyone with a Twitter account is a legitimate news source, we likely do need law enforcement involvement in elections. That doesn't mean there's actual election stealing going on, it just means people believe most anything they read online.


Who is a legitimate news source in your view?

There are too many to list.  "One random guy on Twitter"  is not one of them.


I just asked for one so I can be as well informed as you.

If "you" are is inclined to believe that elections are being stolen, in real time, at some arena in Philadelphia and that it's necessary to form a mob at that arena to save the election, there are much deeper issues than simply not having one news source.


How do you know a random guy on Twitter is wrong if you can't name a real source?
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
(06-14-2022, 11:35 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:31 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:24 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:19 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 10:30 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: Who is a legitimate news source in your view?

There are too many to list.  "One random guy on Twitter"  is not one of them.


I just asked for one so I can be as well informed as you.

If "you" are is inclined to believe that elections are being stolen, in real time, at some arena in Philadelphia and that it's necessary to form a mob at that arena to save the election, there are much deeper issues than simply not having one news source.


How do you know a random guy on Twitter is wrong if you can't name a real source?

There's no connection between those two things.  The existence of real news sources (Fox, CNN, etc) has absolutely no impact on the trustworthiness of random Twitter users or the ridiculousness of mobs forming because one person claims something on Twitter.
Reply
(06-14-2022, 11:42 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:35 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:31 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:24 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:19 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: There are too many to list.  "One random guy on Twitter"  is not one of them.


I just asked for one so I can be as well informed as you.

If "you" are is inclined to believe that elections are being stolen, in real time, at some arena in Philadelphia and that it's necessary to form a mob at that arena to save the election, there are much deeper issues than simply not having one news source.


How do you know a random guy on Twitter is wrong if you can't name a real source?

There's no connection between those two things.  The existence of real news sources (Fox, CNN, etc) has absolutely no impact on the trustworthiness of random Twitter users or the ridiculousness of mobs forming because one person claims something on Twitter?


How can Fox and CNN both be credible sources when they generally say completely opposite things?
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
(06-14-2022, 11:53 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:42 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:35 AM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:31 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 11:24 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: I just asked for one so I can be as well informed as you.

If "you" are is inclined to believe that elections are being stolen, in real time, at some arena in Philadelphia and that it's necessary to form a mob at that arena to save the election, there are much deeper issues than simply not having one news source.


How do you know a random guy on Twitter is wrong if you can't name a real source?

There's no connection between those two things.  The existence of real news sources (Fox, CNN, etc) has absolutely no impact on the trustworthiness of random Twitter users or the ridiculousness of mobs forming because one person claims something on Twitter?


How can Fox and CNN both be credible sources when they generally say completely opposite things?
 I'm not talking about the dishonest talking heads on TV, who editorialize every night.  I'm talking about the online version.  Fox and CNN, if you read comparable stories on their sites, will report the same details 90% of the time.
Reply
^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^
Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:00 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: ^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^

What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:28 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:00 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: ^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^

What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?

I don't recall CNN or any other news source reporting that.  If they did, that's pretty stupid.  It doesn't change anything that I'm saying, but it's irresponsible and stupid.  ALL news outlet get things wrong, are bias, etc.  That's why you shouldn't trust any one source completely, much less trusting anything you read on Twitter....  as Syncro found out regarding the charges against Paul Pelosi supposedly being dropped. Trusting Twitter for facts is foolish. It's even more foolish to trust anything an utter moron like Lauren Boebert says (which I suspect was his source)
Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:40 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:28 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:00 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: ^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^

What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?

I don't recall CNN or any other news source reporting that.  If they did, that's pretty stupid.  It doesn't change anything that I'm saying, but it's irresponsible and stupid.  ALL news outlet get things wrong, are bias, etc.  That's why you shouldn't trust any one source completely, much less trusting anything you read on Twitter....  as Syncro found out regarding the charges against Paul Pelosi supposedly being dropped. Trusting Twitter for facts is foolish. It's even more foolish to trust anything an utter moron like Lauren Boebert says (which I suspect was his source)

Oh they did that and that is just one event they lied about and irresponsibly reported in dishonest fashion that resulted in riots, looting and other damage to people.  The problem is you ignore what the MSM does, which because of the large audience they speak to does much more damage than other sources, and single out a guy on Twitter.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:44 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:40 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:28 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:00 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: ^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^

What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?

I don't recall CNN or any other news source reporting that.  If they did, that's pretty stupid.  It doesn't change anything that I'm saying, but it's irresponsible and stupid.  ALL news outlet get things wrong, are bias, etc.  That's why you shouldn't trust any one source completely, much less trusting anything you read on Twitter....  as Syncro found out regarding the charges against Paul Pelosi supposedly being dropped. Trusting Twitter for facts is foolish. It's even more foolish to trust anything an utter moron like Lauren Boebert says (which I suspect was his source)

Oh they did that and that is just one event they lied about and irresponsibly reported in dishonest fashion that resulted in riots, looting and other damage to people.  The problem is you ignore what the MSM does, which because of the large audience they speak to does much more damage than other sources, and single out a guy on Twitter.

Can you tell me your news source that has never lied or gotten things wrong and is unbiased?
Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:44 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:40 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:28 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:00 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: ^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^

What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?

I don't recall CNN or any other news source reporting that.  If they did, that's pretty stupid.  It doesn't change anything that I'm saying, but it's irresponsible and stupid.  ALL news outlet get things wrong, are bias, etc.  That's why you shouldn't trust any one source completely, much less trusting anything you read on Twitter....  as Syncro found out regarding the charges against Paul Pelosi supposedly being dropped. Trusting Twitter for facts is foolish. It's even more foolish to trust anything an utter moron like Lauren Boebert says (which I suspect was his source)

Oh they did that and that is just one event they lied about and irresponsibly reported in dishonest fashion that resulted in riots, looting and other damage to people.  The problem is you ignore what the MSM does, which because of the large audience they speak to does much more damage than other sources, and single out a guy on Twitter.
Difference is Syncro immediately realized he made a error , took adult responsibility for posting misinformation and made amends to everyone for doing so. You know like sane reasonable Adults would do. 
But the child like adult on the board continues to SSDD about something that was in a Adult manner addressed.
Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:49 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:44 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:40 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:28 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:00 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: ^^^^But, again, none of this has anything to do with running down to an arena, where votes are being counted, because some yahoo on Twitter claims something^^^

What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?

I don't recall CNN or any other news source reporting that.  If they did, that's pretty stupid.  It doesn't change anything that I'm saying, but it's irresponsible and stupid.  ALL news outlet get things wrong, are bias, etc.  That's why you shouldn't trust any one source completely, much less trusting anything you read on Twitter....  as Syncro found out regarding the charges against Paul Pelosi supposedly being dropped. Trusting Twitter for facts is foolish. It's even more foolish to trust anything an utter moron like Lauren Boebert says (which I suspect was his source)

Oh they did that and that is just one event they lied about and irresponsibly reported in dishonest fashion that resulted in riots, looting and other damage to people.  The problem is you ignore what the MSM does, which because of the large audience they speak to does much more damage than other sources, and single out a guy on Twitter.

Can you tell me your news source that has never lied or gotten things wrong and is unbiased?

There is no such thing but that has nothing to do with the issue of 90% of the media running the exact same daily narratives most of which are completely dishonest.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."


Reply
(06-14-2022, 12:53 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:49 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:44 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:40 PM)P1tchblack Wrote:
(06-14-2022, 12:28 PM)Hightop77 Wrote: What about running out and burning and looting entire city blocks because CNN and MSNBC reported that Michael Brown was shot in the back while holding his hands up?

I don't recall CNN or any other news source reporting that.  If they did, that's pretty stupid.  It doesn't change anything that I'm saying, but it's irresponsible and stupid.  ALL news outlet get things wrong, are bias, etc.  That's why you shouldn't trust any one source completely, much less trusting anything you read on Twitter....  as Syncro found out regarding the charges against Paul Pelosi supposedly being dropped. Trusting Twitter for facts is foolish. It's even more foolish to trust anything an utter moron like Lauren Boebert says (which I suspect was his source)

Oh they did that and that is just one event they lied about and irresponsibly reported in dishonest fashion that resulted in riots, looting and other damage to people.  The problem is you ignore what the MSM does, which because of the large audience they speak to does much more damage than other sources, and single out a guy on Twitter.

Can you tell me your news source that has never lied or gotten things wrong and is unbiased?

There is no such thing but that has nothing to do with the issue of 90% of the media running the exact same daily narratives most of which are completely dishonest.

Well, pick a recent topic and let's compare a web story from CNN and one from Fox to see how similar they are.
Reply
Pelosi's husband charged with DUI

(CNN) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband was arrested and charged with driving under the influence after being involved in a collision Saturday night, law enforcement officials said.

Paul Pelosi, 82, was arrested at 11:44 p.m. PT and charged with driving under the influence and driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08% or higher, according to the Napa County Criminal Justice Network's public booking report. Both charges are misdemeanors.
TMZ was the first to report the arrest.

Pelosi was attempting to cross SR-29 when his 2021 Porsche was hit by a 2014 Jeep traveling northbound on the road, according to a collision report from the California Highway Patrol, which doesn't identify either driver as being at fault in the crash. Troopers were called to the scene just before 10:30 p.m., the report said.

There were no injuries reported in the crash and the Jeep's driver was not arrested, the report said.

CNN has reached out to the highway patrol and the Napa County Sheriff's Office for additional details.

Bail was set at $5,000 according to the booking report, and records indicate Pelosi was released Sunday morning.

"The Speaker will not be commenting on this private matter which occurred while she was on the East Coast," a statement from Drew Hammill, Pelosi's spokesperson, said. CNN reached out for an updated statement after the collision report was released.

The speaker was in Rhode Island on Sunday to speak at Brown University's commencement ceremony.

Paul Pelosi, a native of San Francisco, has been married to Nancy Pelosi since 1963. The two have five children.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/29/politics/...index.html
Reply
(FOX)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul arrested in California, charged with DUI

Paul Pelosi was released from jail on Sunday morning

Paul Pelosi, House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi's husband, has been arrested after allegedly driving under the influence late Saturday night.

Paul Pelosi was arrested in Napa County, California, at 11:44 p.m. on Saturday, and was charged with driving with a blood-alcohol level of .08 or higher as well as driving under the influence of alcohol.

The arrest was first reported by TMZ.

He was booked into jail at 4:13 a.m. on Sunday, and released at 7:26 a.m. according to Napa County records.


Those records indicate his bail was set at $5,000.

Paul Pelosi, 82, has been married to Nancy Pelosi since 1963.

A spokesperson for Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said she would not be commenting on the "private" matter.

"The speaker will not be commenting on this private matter which occurred while she was on the East Coast," the spokesperson said.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nancy-p...harged-dui
Reply
(06-14-2022, 01:22 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (FOX)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul arrested in California, charged with DUI

Paul Pelosi was released from jail on Sunday morning

Paul Pelosi, House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi's husband, has been arrested after allegedly driving under the influence late Saturday night.

Paul Pelosi was arrested in Napa County, California, at 11:44 p.m. on Saturday, and was charged with driving with a blood-alcohol level of .08 or higher as well as driving under the influence of alcohol.

The arrest was first reported by TMZ.

He was booked into jail at 4:13 a.m. on Sunday, and released at 7:26 a.m. according to Napa County records.


Those records indicate his bail was set at $5,000.

Paul Pelosi, 82, has been married to Nancy Pelosi since 1963.

A spokesperson for Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said she would not be commenting on the "private" matter.

"The speaker will not be commenting on this private matter which occurred while she was on the East Coast," the spokesperson said.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nancy-p...harged-dui
LMAO thats a basic wire story every media outlet ran. Hell read the Fox version to the end they credit TMZ for breaking the story and basically ran what they reported.  Common every day stuff.  Not Political commentary . Thats a stretch by any sense of the word.  Lets pull some stories from 2020 on the " Mostly"  Peaceful Protests by Comparison.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  12:01 PM, January 20th, 2025. ScarletHayes 3 34 11-07-2024, 12:13 AM
Last Post: lrrps21
  January 19th, 2025 flight booked to... ScarletHayes 22 155 07-01-2024, 11:05 PM
Last Post: davebucknut
  Will Donald Trump be inaugurated as our POTUS in January? K9Buck 12 175 05-24-2024, 03:58 PM
Last Post: zigbee
  The fairy tale of the January 6th "insurrection" K9Buck 2 104 04-28-2024, 09:11 PM
Last Post: ScarletHayes
  (Hypothetical) Dems to January 6 rioters: "Hold my beer." P1tchblack 6 151 02-26-2024, 11:46 AM
Last Post: TroyKidd
  13 January 2024 Insurrection ChinaBuck 148 2,683 01-19-2024, 06:50 PM
Last Post: 3rdgensooner
  Donald Trump formally subpoenaed by January 6 committee K9Buck 24 544 04-13-2023, 02:36 PM
Last Post: TroyKidd
  Who unlocked the capitol magnetic doors on January 6th? computerbuck 63 1,612 07-25-2022, 01:24 PM
Last Post: ScarletHayes
  Kamala Harris, pipe bombs and January 6 ScarletHayes 14 613 02-11-2022, 10:49 AM
Last Post: P1tchblack
  How depressing for America's Northernmost town in Alaska: light gone till January zigbee 11 600 11-18-2021, 08:14 PM
Last Post: ChinaBuck

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
https://www.facebook.com/Zigbeenuthousecom-425755324858973/?modal=admin_todo_tour