Posts: 32,206
Threads: 736
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
52
(06-13-2022, 02:01 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: 2000 Mules doesn't even prove any meaningful amount of ballot harvesting happened, much less proving that a single one of the "harvested" ballots were even fraudulent. If 100 ballots were harvested, ever single one of the could be a perfectly legal and valid ballot.
Alright, I gotta respond to this.  Â
1. The movie focused on mules that all went to at least 10 drop boxes per person. Please give me a rational reason for this. This wasn't just a few guys, this was 2000 guys going to "community centers," picking up ballots, taking them to different drop boxes throughout the city, and TAKING PICTURES of the individual drop boxes. If these were simply paid boy scouts, why didn't they just dump all those "legit" votes in one box?  
2. Ok, so for the sake of argument I'll pretend all 2000 of those guys/gals were boy-scouts motivated to do their civic duty. Ok, great, that brings a couple of other questions: Why would people take their own ballots to some community organizing group/center? I don't know any current names so let's just roll with ACORN. If you wanted your vote to count, but for some reason couldn't vote in person, you decide ya know what, I'm not sure about the post office, but ACORN!  Oh yeah, those guys will take darn good care of my ballot. I'll give it to them so they can give it to another guy who will then take it to a drop box. Again, I wouldn't mail it in, nor, for some mind blowing reason, even take it to a drop box myself, but I go out of my way to take it to ACORN?????? Does this even remotely pass the smell test to you? Â
2000 of these guys in the key swing states, and yet you say with confidence that there's no meaningful voter fraud. Does that seriously pass the threshold of beyond a reasonable doubt to you?
Posts: 16,286
Threads: 279
Joined: May 2020
Reputation:
31
(06-13-2022, 08:59 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-13-2022, 02:01 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: 2000 Mules doesn't even prove any meaningful amount of ballot harvesting happened, much less proving that a single one of the "harvested" ballots were even fraudulent. If 100 ballots were harvested, ever single one of the could be a perfectly legal and valid ballot.
Alright, I gotta respond to this.  Â
1. The movie focused on mules that all went to at least 10 drop boxes per person. Please give me a rational reason for this. This wasn't just a few guys, this was 2000 guys going to "community centers," picking up ballots, taking them to different drop boxes throughout the city, and TAKING PICTURES of the individual drop boxes. If these were simply paid boy scouts, why didn't they just dump all those "legit" votes in one box? Â
2. Ok, so for the sake of argument I'll pretend all 2000 of those guys/gals were boy-scouts motivated to do their civic duty. Ok, great, that brings a couple of other questions: Why would people take their own ballots to some community organizing group/center? I don't know any current names so let's just roll with ACORN. If you wanted your vote to count, but for some reason couldn't vote in person, you decide ya know what, I'm not sure about the post office, but ACORN!  Oh yeah, those guys will take darn good care of my ballot. I'll give it to them so they can give it to another guy who will then take it to a drop box. Again, I wouldn't mail it in, nor, for some mind blowing reason, even take it to a drop box myself, but I go out of my way to take it to ACORN?????? Does this even remotely pass the smell test to you? Â
2000 of these guys in the key swing states, and yet you say with confidence that there's no meaningful voter fraud. Does that seriously pass the threshold of beyond a reasonable doubt to you? He'll ignore all of this
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Posts: 7,462
Threads: 191
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
39
(06-13-2022, 05:26 PM)Bonebuck Wrote: So Brit Hume of all people on Fox-said the Democrats are doing Republicans a favor for these hearings so Donald Trump is not on ballot. I wanted to punch the TV.
If Trump runs-who would not vote for him.(Pitch you do not count) I†d sure as hell vote for DeSantis in the primary.
Posts: 32,206
Threads: 736
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
52
(06-13-2022, 09:59 PM)stxbuck Wrote: (06-13-2022, 05:26 PM)Bonebuck Wrote: So Brit Hume of all people on Fox-said the Democrats are doing Republicans a favor for these hearings so Donald Trump is not on ballot. I wanted to punch the TV.
If Trump runs-who would not vote for him.(Pitch you do not count) Iâ€d sure as hell vote for DeSantis in the primary.
A Trump/DeSantis ticket could realistically turn into a 12 year deal.
Posts: 16,317
Threads: 2,603
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
48
(06-13-2022, 11:03 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-13-2022, 09:59 PM)stxbuck Wrote: (06-13-2022, 05:26 PM)Bonebuck Wrote: So Brit Hume of all people on Fox-said the Democrats are doing Republicans a favor for these hearings so Donald Trump is not on ballot. I wanted to punch the TV.
If Trump runs-who would not vote for him.(Pitch you do not count) Iâ€d sure as hell vote for DeSantis in the primary.
A Trump/DeSantis ticket could realistically turn into a 12 year deal.
The GOP has no chance in 24'. The Dems have perfected cheating.
Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...
- Benito Mussolini
1
(06-13-2022, 08:39 PM)davebucknut Wrote: (06-13-2022, 08:01 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-13-2022, 07:31 PM)davebucknut Wrote: (06-13-2022, 01:22 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-13-2022, 01:05 PM)davebucknut Wrote: You're a stooge 99% never got charged and were released a mere hours after their arrests.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk Yes, a huge number of people were never charged because they were only arrested for typical, non-violent crimes like curfew violations or not leaving an area when asked.
If you did even an ounce of research, you would see all the George Floyd rioters who were put in prison for things like arson and destruction of property, but you have absolutely no interest in facts
They arrest 5 out of 100 rioters and arsonist.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk Pulled those numbers right out of your arse. Shocking! Every night we saw thousands of rioters and wed hear that 10-20 got arrested, 8-18 would be released immediately with no charges filed, and 1-4 would get actual charges.
The other 1895 rioters got away with free stuff and left a warzone.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk No, we did not see thousands of people looting and setting fire to buildings every night. We did see buildings burning with a lot of people around it, in some cases. We also saw some number of people looting, but it was not thousands every night. More hyperbole. Â
And, again, I'd bet the farm that you have spent ZERO time actually reading about all of the convictions and prison terms given out. Just like Jan 6, BLM rioters were arrested for days, weeks and months following the crimes being committed. Â
You have no interest in reality, only exaggeration.
Posts: 32,206
Threads: 736
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
52
(06-13-2022, 11:09 PM)K9Buck Wrote: The GOP has no chance in 24'. The Dems have perfected cheating.
It will be a lot harder without the cover of Covid keeping observers away, new verification laws in places like Georgia, etc...  but, yeah they will try to pull their usual game. That said I suspect we will see massive brawls breaking out at polling locations when people confront the cheats
Posts: 29,971
Threads: 519
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
(06-14-2022, 08:01 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-13-2022, 11:09 PM)K9Buck Wrote: The GOP has no chance in 24'. The Dems have perfected cheating.
It will be a lot harder without the cover of Covid keeping observers away, new verification laws in places like Georgia, etc...  but, yeah they will try to pull their usual game. That said I suspect we will see massive brawls breaking out at polling locations when people confront the cheats
Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
Posts: 32,206
Threads: 736
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
52
(06-14-2022, 08:08 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
It's going to be a spectacle with the FBI getting their Ray Epps types out there so they can make very public arrests. 2024 is when it will really crank up
(06-14-2022, 08:08 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:01 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-13-2022, 11:09 PM)K9Buck Wrote: The GOP has no chance in 24'. The Dems have perfected cheating.
It will be a lot harder without the cover of Covid keeping observers away, new verification laws in places like Georgia, etc...  but, yeah they will try to pull their usual game. That said I suspect we will see massive brawls breaking out at polling locations when people confront the cheats
Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
Given that a significant number of people believe anyone with a Twitter account is a legitimate news source, we likely do need law enforcement involvement in elections. That doesn't mean there's actual election stealing going on, it just means people believe most anything they read online.
Posts: 29,971
Threads: 519
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
(06-14-2022, 10:11 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:08 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:01 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-13-2022, 11:09 PM)K9Buck Wrote: The GOP has no chance in 24'. The Dems have perfected cheating.
It will be a lot harder without the cover of Covid keeping observers away, new verification laws in places like Georgia, etc...  but, yeah they will try to pull their usual game. That said I suspect we will see massive brawls breaking out at polling locations when people confront the cheats
Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
Given that a significant number of people believe anyone with a Twitter account is a legitimate news source, we likely do need law enforcement involvement in elections. That doesn't mean there's actual election stealing going on, it just means people believe most anything they read online.
Who is a legitimate news source in your view?
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
(06-14-2022, 10:30 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 10:11 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:08 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:01 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: (06-13-2022, 11:09 PM)K9Buck Wrote: The GOP has no chance in 24'. The Dems have perfected cheating.
It will be a lot harder without the cover of Covid keeping observers away, new verification laws in places like Georgia, etc...  but, yeah they will try to pull their usual game. That said I suspect we will see massive brawls breaking out at polling locations when people confront the cheats
Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
Given that a significant number of people believe anyone with a Twitter account is a legitimate news source, we likely do need law enforcement involvement in elections. That doesn't mean there's actual election stealing going on, it just means people believe most anything they read online.
Who is a legitimate news source in your view?
There are too many to list. "One random guy on Twitter" is not one of them.
Posts: 6,509
Threads: 204
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
26
Posts: 29,971
Threads: 519
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
(06-14-2022, 11:19 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-14-2022, 10:30 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 10:11 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:08 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:01 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: It will be a lot harder without the cover of Covid keeping observers away, new verification laws in places like Georgia, etc...  but, yeah they will try to pull their usual game. That said I suspect we will see massive brawls breaking out at polling locations when people confront the cheats
Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
Given that a significant number of people believe anyone with a Twitter account is a legitimate news source, we likely do need law enforcement involvement in elections. That doesn't mean there's actual election stealing going on, it just means people believe most anything they read online.
Who is a legitimate news source in your view?
There are too many to list. "One random guy on Twitter" is not one of them.
I just asked for one so I can be as well informed as you.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
(06-14-2022, 11:24 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 11:19 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-14-2022, 10:30 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: (06-14-2022, 10:11 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (06-14-2022, 08:08 AM)Hightop77 Wrote: Look for heavy FBI involvement to "protect the integrity of the polling places and our democracy".
Given that a significant number of people believe anyone with a Twitter account is a legitimate news source, we likely do need law enforcement involvement in elections. That doesn't mean there's actual election stealing going on, it just means people believe most anything they read online.
Who is a legitimate news source in your view?
There are too many to list. "One random guy on Twitter" is not one of them.
I just asked for one so I can be as well informed as you.
If "you" are is inclined to believe that elections are being stolen, in real time, at some arena in Philadelphia and that it's necessary to form a mob at that arena to save the election, there are much deeper issues than simply not having one news source.
|
