January 6

[P1tchblack]

He wasnâ€t in the Beast. He was in an SUV. The SS says he didnâ€t do it. I believe them. I also believe he was beyond mad. I donâ€t have a problem with that.

It sounds like most people involved are full of sh!t.  The NY Post shows a pick of an SUV, but then she's saying The Beast:

https://nypost.com/2022/06/29/secret-ser...nge-claim/

[Hightop77]

He wasnâ€t in the Beast. He was in an SUV. The SS says he didnâ€t do it. I believe them. I also believe he was beyond mad. I donâ€t have a problem with that.

It sounds like most people involved are full of sh!t.  The NY Post shows a pick of an SUV, but then she's saying The Beast:

https://nypost.com/2022/06/29/secret-ser...nge-claim/

The point is she apparently doesn't even know which presidential vehicle Trump was in yet is giving testimony about it.  This is why real courts require cross examination of witnesses.  Jim Jordan would have crushed her and that is precisely why Pelosi did not allow him to be there.

[3rdgensooner]

You do not take hearsay evidence period. This is an example why.

[Bonebuck]

The F-ing lefties have lost their minds. My God. How many more times is Adam Schiithead have to lose before he loses credibility??? Schitthead went after Trump for 4 years and lost and now here he is again bringing false accusations.

You would think brain dead Democrats would put 2 +2 together but they just keep on believing BS/false news.

[davebucknut]

The F-ing lefties have lost their minds. My God. How many more times is Adam Schiithead have to lose before he loses credibility??? Schitthead went after Trump for 4 years and lost and now here he is again bringing false accusations.

You would think brain dead Democrats would put 2 +2 together but they just keep on believing BS/false news.

It is because 80% or more democrats will believe anything that their cheerleaders tell them. They are buffoons who even after they realize the truth they justify it because of ideology.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[ScarletHayes]

[P1tchblack]

................

But on Wednesday evening, two retired agents who worked with Trump presented an alternate perspective, remarking to Business Insider that Trump is "not the most agile human being" and that at 6'3" and 250 pounds was too plump to have successfully hijacked the "extremely tight" sport utility vehicle.

"Trump's not a little guy, right? And the space to actually be able to lunge towards the wheel is not that big," one of them said. "I don't mean to sound disparaging to the former president, but just his girth would prevent him from actually getting to the steering wheel."

Former Secret Service Deputy Assistant Director Bill Pickle was also skeptical and agreed with that point of view.

"Am I saying it didn't happen? I'm not going to say that, because we all know this guy can be pretty emotional," he said, and "I've never heard anything credible about that happening. You have to slightly be a contortionist to get from the back cabin to the front cabin and the president's not a contortionist."

The first unnamed agent added that while the SUV is designed for agents to move from front to back, Trump going the other way is "ridiculous. I mean, it's not a pretty sight" and that it is "hard to believe" that Trump would have even dared.

He conceded that although the scenario is "not impossible, it would… I just, I don't see this president ever being able to do that," he further chuckled to Insider. "Ever."


https://www.alternet.org/2022/06/secret-...ump-girth/

[Erhino]

You do not take hearsay evidence period. This is an example why.

Scarlet is right on jumping the shark. Even if 100% true, WGAS? What was even more odd was hearing her testimony and inflection she delivered. She told it with emotional cues and details like she was witness to the crazy. It made zero sense to have her instead of guy that allegedly told her the story.

[ScarletHayes]

You do not take hearsay evidence period. This is an example why.

Scarlet is right on jumping the shark. Even if 100% true, WGAS? What was even more odd was hearing her testimony and inflection she delivered. She told it with emotional cues and details like she was witness to the crazy. It made zero sense to have her instead of guy that allegedly told her the story.

They trot these people out like we're stupid.  She isn't in jeopardy of perjury because she heard it second or 3rd hand.  Which really reflects horribly on this "committee."  It was a joke from the beginning.  Hearsay witnesses?  Seriously? 

If there's still any doubt left on the point of this committee you're either hopelessly naive or just simply a hack with a raging conformation bias.  

I'm really starting to believe that self preservation is a major motivator.  With the info on Biden now knowing about Hunter's overseas dealings, it's looking like the circle could be closing around everything from the Russia collusion hoax (Biden was in on that scheme as well) all the way down to this committee.  Those people were and are TERRIFIED of Trump.  Now that they went after him on multiple occasions, what does a reeeeeeeally vindictive Trump do if he wins in 2024?  #popcorn

[Alabuckeye]

Why wouldnâ€t any testimony she gives be subject to perjury? Sheâ€s under oath……thatâ€s part of that process, whether repeating hearsay or not.

Not that I expect the House to do anything about the alleged perjury….

[Hightop77]

You do not take hearsay evidence period. This is an example why.

Scarlet is right on jumping the shark. Even if 100% true, WGAS? What was even more odd was hearing her testimony and inflection she delivered. She told it with emotional cues and details like she was witness to the crazy. It made zero sense to have her instead of guy that allegedly told her the story.

They trot these people out like we're stupid.  She isn't in jeopardy of perjury because she heard it second or 3rd hand.  Which really reflects horribly on this "committee."  It was a joke from the beginning.  Hearsay witnesses?  Seriously? 

If there's still any doubt left on the point of this committee you're either hopelessly naive or just simply a hack with a raging conformation bias.  

I'm really starting to believe that self preservation is a major motivator.  With the info on Biden now knowing about Hunter's overseas dealings, it's looking like the circle could be closing around everything from the Russia collusion hoax (Biden was in on that scheme as well) all the way down to this committee.  Those people were and are TERRIFIED of Trump.  Now that they went after him on multiple occasions, what does a reeeeeeeally vindictive Trump do if he wins in 2024?  #popcorn

But even after this completely absurd segment from the committee, notice the media doesn't call into question the committee itself including the corrupt aspects of how Pelosi set it up and how none of the "evidence" would be accepted in a real courtroom.  To them Trump is still a criminal and needs to be charged and they won't do any serious reporting that will expose what this is really all about and what a circus it is.

[P1tchblack]

Why wouldnâ€t any testimony she gives be subject to perjury?  Sheâ€s under oath……thatâ€s part of that process, whether repeating hearsay or not.

Not that I expect the House to do anything about the alleged perjury….

If she's acknowledging that she's only regurgitating a story she was told, I don't see how she can be accused of perjury.

[Alabuckeye]

Fair enough. Which is why hearsay evidence is not allowed in a real setting of consequence.

[P1tchblack]

Video of Trump fighting Secret Service in the SUV

[davebucknut]

Why wouldnâ€t any testimony she gives be subject to perjury? Sheâ€s under oath……thatâ€s part of that process, whether repeating hearsay or not.

Not that I expect the House to do anything about the alleged perjury….

We have kangaroo courts now man.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk