(05-10-2022, 07:02 PM)maize Wrote: Promises More Violence Nationwide: “Our Last Warning”

A radical pro-abortion group is claiming responsibility for firebombing a pro-life groupâ€s office in Wisconsin and itâ€s promising more violence nationwide. The threat of violence comes as pro-abortion extreme have targeted the homes of Supreme Court justices.

As LifeNews reported, abortion activists firebombed a pro-life groupâ€s office in Madison, Wisconsin. A leftist radical threw Molotov cocktails into Wisconsin Family Actionâ€s office in the capital city and a picture of the destruction shows the office heavily damaged from the bomb.

The pro-abortion terrorists responsible also vandalized the building and left a threatening message saying “If abortions arenâ€t safe, then you arenâ€t either.”

Now,a radical pro-abortion group named Janeâ€s Revenge is saying it was responsible and is threatening increasingly violent attacks that extend beyond Wisconsin if its demands are not met, writing, “Wisconsin is the first flashpoint, but we are all over the US, and we will issue no further warnings.”

Hereâ€s more:

In a series of tweets, Bellingcatâ€s Robert Evans reported receiving a statement from a group called Janeâ€s Revenge, in which the organization took credit for the suspected arson.

Evans writes for Bellingcat, which is based in the Netherlands and describes itself as a collective of researchers and open-source journalists.

NBC15 News has not independently verified the contents of Evans†tweets and are working to do so. The Madison Police Dept. stated it was aware that a group had claimed responsibility and that it was working with federal investigators to determine if the claim is true. The police department would not confirm if that group was Janeâ€s Revenge.

In his reporting, Evans explained the name of the group, Janeâ€s Revenge, is a reference to Jane Collective, which the Chicago-based NPR-affiliate WBEZ recently described as a group of activists in Chicago who helped provide abortion access to thousands of women who did not have legal access in the years leading up to the Roe v. Wade verdict in 1973.

During a news conference Monday, MPD Chief Shon Barnes did not identify any possible suspects or organizations linked to the incident, although investigators have said they believed the attack was targeted.

The threats are meant to shut down pro-life groups and pregnancy centers and stop them from working to ban abortions and save babies.

“They are issuing a 30 day ultimatum for all anti choice organizations and fake clinics (crisis pregnancy centers) to disband. They claim to have the ability to reach multiple states and repeat that the attack in Wisconsin was just a “warning,” the European reporter writes. “They conclude by noting they are made up of several organizations: “We are in your city. We are in every city. Your repression only strengthens our accompliceship and resolve.”


https://www.lifenews.com/2022/05/10/pro-...t-warning/

In a normal American society and under most administrations not Obama/Biden the DOJ and FBI would take care of this, but in those 2 administrations, these are their foot soldiers.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

#provocation

Get ready for another summer of total violence by Pappy George Soros/Antifa and left wing news covering it up and calling it peaceful. The closer it gets to November the worse it gets. Soros is old and he is going to go all in on payouts for these freaks that do not care.

(05-10-2022, 10:04 PM)Bonebuck Wrote: Get ready for another summer of total violence by Pappy George Soros/Antifa and left wing news covering it up and calling it peaceful. The closer it gets to November the worse it gets. Soros is old and he is going to go all in on payouts for these freaks that do not care.

What's bad is soros' son will carry the torch when he's dead.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Iâ€m disappointed in you guys. I purposely titled the thread for you to crack a joke.

“If Roe had gone down, we wouldnâ€t have this issue.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(05-11-2022, 08:04 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: Iâ€m disappointed in you guys. I purposely titled the thread for you to crack a joke.

“If Roe had gone down, we wouldnâ€t have this issue. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The board as a whole needs a time out in the corner for missing that one. 

That is what a grooved fastball looks like, and we all watched it go by without even a check swing.

(05-11-2022, 08:13 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-11-2022, 08:04 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: Iâ€m disappointed in you guys. I purposely titled the thread for you to crack a joke.

“If Roe had gone down, we wouldnâ€t have this issue. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The board as a whole needs a time out in the corner for missing that one. 

That is what a grooved fastball looks like, and we all watched it go by without even a check swing.

The gross ineptitude of the Reds might have spread to the rest of the board.

Manchin to vote no on Dems' Roe v. Wade bill, saying it goes too far

The West Virginia Democrat said the current bill is not what he was hoping for


Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., will be opposing a Democratic abortion bill when it is up for a procedural vote Wednesday afternoon, stating that it is too broad for his liking.

Manchin said that while he would vote for a bill that would legalize abortion on the federal level, the bill before the Senate now "is not what I was hoping for and what I expected" because it goes too far.


"I was hopeful that the Democratic Party having control of the agenda would put a piece of legislation forward that would codify Roe v. Wade," Manchin said, stating that 70% of the American people want this.


"To me, that would be the reasonable, rational thing to do. The bill we have today to vote on, Women's Health Protection Act … make no mistake, it is not Roe v. Wade codification, it is an expansion. It wipes 500--500 state laws off the books. It expands abortion."


Manchin lamented that the bill that he and his colleagues will be voting on goes too far on an issue that is "extremely political" and divisive.

"We should not be dividing this country further than we're already divided," he said. "And it's really the politics of Congress that's dividing the country. It's not the people. They're telling us what they want. And it's just disappointing that we're going to be voting on a piece of legislation which I will not vote for today. But I would vote for Roe v. Wade codification if it was today, I was hopeful for that. But I found out yesterday in caucus that wasn't going to be."



When asked why he will not change his position on the matter, Manchin said, "I've been pro-life all my life. I believe strongly in my religion," while adding that he does believe in exceptions for cases such as rape and incest, and supports abortion rights consistent with Roe v. Wade because it's been "the law of this land."

"Maybe my pro-life might not be someone else's pro-life, but I know how I feel," he said. "Life is – it's a gift."

(05-11-2022, 12:24 PM)zigbee Wrote: Manchin to vote no on Dems' Roe v. Wade bill, saying it goes too far

The West Virginia Democrat said the current bill is not what he was hoping for


Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., will be opposing a Democratic abortion bill when it is up for a procedural vote Wednesday afternoon, stating that it is too broad for his liking.

Manchin said that while he would vote for a bill that would legalize abortion on the federal level, the bill before the Senate now "is not what I was hoping for and what I expected" because it goes too far.


"I was hopeful that the Democratic Party having control of the agenda would put a piece of legislation forward that would codify Roe v. Wade," Manchin said, stating that 70% of the American people want this.


"To me, that would be the reasonable, rational thing to do. The bill we have today to vote on, Women's Health Protection Act … make no mistake, it is not Roe v. Wade codification, it is an expansion. It wipes 500--500 state laws off the books. It expands abortion."


Manchin lamented that the bill that he and his colleagues will be voting on goes too far on an issue that is "extremely political" and divisive.

"We should not be dividing this country further than we're already divided," he said. "And it's really the politics of Congress that's dividing the country. It's not the people. They're telling us what they want. And it's just disappointing that we're going to be voting on a piece of legislation which I will not vote for today. But I would vote for Roe v. Wade codification if it was today, I was hopeful for that. But I found out yesterday in caucus that wasn't going to be."



When asked why he will not change his position on the matter, Manchin said, "I've been pro-life all my life. I believe strongly in my religion," while adding that he does believe in exceptions for cases such as rape and incest, and supports abortion rights consistent with Roe v. Wade because it's been "the law of this land."

"Maybe my pro-life might not be someone else's pro-life, but I know how I feel," he said. "Life is – it's a gift."

Good for Manchin. He still needs to be replaced in 2024 anyway lol.

Wouldn't any federal abortion law be struck down as in violation of the 10th Amendment anyway?

I disagree. Iâ€m fine with Manchin staying in and being a voice of reason in the Dem party. They need it

(05-11-2022, 12:54 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: I disagree. Iâ€m fine with Manchin staying in and being a voice of reason in the Dem party. They need it

Not if having that "voice of reason" means Chuck Schumer is still the Majority Leader.

(05-11-2022, 12:54 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: I disagree. Iâ€m fine with Manchin staying in and being a voice of reason in the Dem party. They need it

He voted for the post-election stimulus as well as the infrastructure bill, which have combined to (primarily) cause inflation to reach a 40 year high. I'd be fine with him representing Vermont or Cali, but not what might be the most conservative state in the union. Come on Bammer, GET REAL!

(05-11-2022, 01:05 PM)Hightop77 Wrote:

(05-11-2022, 12:54 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: I disagree. Iâ€m fine with Manchin staying in and being a voice of reason in the Dem party. They need it

Not if having that "voice of reason" means Chuck Schumer is still the Majority Leader.

Itâ€s a deal. If the choice was that manchin gave them the majority by virtue of Kamala, then yes, Iâ€d want a republican

(05-11-2022, 01:07 PM)Beastdog Wrote:

(05-11-2022, 12:54 PM)Alabuckeye Wrote: I disagree. Iâ€m fine with Manchin staying in and being a voice of reason in the Dem party. They need it

He voted for the post-election stimulus as well as the infrastructure bill, which have combined to (primarily) cause inflation to reach a 40 year high. I'd be fine with him representing Vermont or Cali, but not what might be the most conservative state in the union. Come on Bammer, GET REAL!

This battle is won on different levels. One of them must be a resurgence of blue dog Democrats. And I use that term loosely