(04-16-2019, 11:09 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 10:40 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 09:50 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote: What is the vibe that this place gives off?  I'm asking without trying to be or come across as defensive.  If open, honest, sometimes uncomfortable discussion, freaks people out, then maybe they shouldn't come here.  Luvda never really struck me as that type of guy at all.

It's a site that offers free and open discussion within reason and liberals can't have that.  Liberals want to control what is insensitive so they can control speech with their victim hood.  Look at the Covington kids.  That kid smirking was what the liberal pc media called "white privilege" and it was insensitive to the praying Indian.  Once the pc media labeled the kid as having white privilege they wanted us to   "don't pay attention to the facts about the black hebrews and the lies told by Indian" the important thing was the smirk of white privilege.  You can also use the same theory on the "women should be believed"

We here challenge that notion and folks like Rhino expect us to just accept what the pc crowd spews.   

The vibe I would guess is there are more folks on this board who lean conservative and a couple liberals who claim to be libertarians and a couple fly by liberals.

Sadly liberals who would discuss issues such as Somenole don't come by often enough.

I agree with your general take, but I wouldn't consider Rhino part of the pc crowd.  I mean you can usually spot those people a mile away.  Most of the time they don't even know what the hell they're talking about.  So on that note, I wouldn't say that Rhino is really ever parroting a script.   Rhino is probably more a libertarian on social issues.  i.e. there's at least some substance behind his position(s). That said, your take on liberals is spot on.

Someone like rhino, or Pitch, or even myself when I'm feeling contrarian will throw out a scenario or question for discussion, and the usual suspects won't even be able to process it. Just 'Trump good, liberal media bad, D's are insane, you're an SJW troll!!!". It's like Groundhog Day for discussion.

(04-17-2019, 12:23 PM)stxbuck Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 11:09 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 10:40 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 09:50 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote: What is the vibe that this place gives off?  I'm asking without trying to be or come across as defensive.  If open, honest, sometimes uncomfortable discussion, freaks people out, then maybe they shouldn't come here.  Luvda never really struck me as that type of guy at all.

It's a site that offers free and open discussion within reason and liberals can't have that.  Liberals want to control what is insensitive so they can control speech with their victim hood.  Look at the Covington kids.  That kid smirking was what the liberal pc media called "white privilege" and it was insensitive to the praying Indian.  Once the pc media labeled the kid as having white privilege they wanted us to   "don't pay attention to the facts about the black hebrews and the lies told by Indian" the important thing was the smirk of white privilege.  You can also use the same theory on the "women should be believed"

We here challenge that notion and folks like Rhino expect us to just accept what the pc crowd spews.   

The vibe I would guess is there are more folks on this board who lean conservative and a couple liberals who claim to be libertarians and a couple fly by liberals.

Sadly liberals who would discuss issues such as Somenole don't come by often enough.

I agree with your general take, but I wouldn't consider Rhino part of the pc crowd.  I mean you can usually spot those people a mile away.  Most of the time they don't even know what the hell they're talking about.  So on that note, I wouldn't say that Rhino is really ever parroting a script.   Rhino is probably more a libertarian on social issues.  i.e. there's at least some substance behind his position(s). That said, your take on liberals is spot on.

Someone like rhino, or Pitch, or even myself when I'm feeling contrarian will throw out a scenario or question for discussion, and the usual suspects won't even be able to process it. Just 'Trump good, liberal media bad, D's are insane, you're an SJW troll!!!". It's like Groundhog Day for discussion.

You've got maybe 2 or 3 who say SJW at best.  What you maintain about the entire group is not really true.

(04-17-2019, 10:43 AM)K9Buck Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 07:43 PM)Erhino Wrote: To be fair, didn't read the Stormfront thread. 

Yet you're criticizing the discussion of such a topic, in spite of the rather scholarly discussion that it is.  

What other topics should be banned from discussion?

Who said anything about banning? Sorry to burst your outrage bubble. I responded to a very specific question, why a football loving, left leaning, hall of fame poster would not post here. The point stands whether the Stormfront thread was about Chinese finger traps or kkk, racial outrage, and political outrage in general dominates the board. That is the vibe.

My comment has nothing to do with banning and is about why he wouldnâ€t care to be part of this community.

(04-16-2019, 07:16 PM)Erhino Wrote: As long as you're deleting threads why not take a whack at the Stormfront thread. 

Yes, you suggested that the topic of Stormfront be banned.

Also. I am not "outraged".  I am simply asking which other topics you support banning.

(04-17-2019, 12:42 PM)Erhino Wrote:

(04-17-2019, 10:43 AM)K9Buck Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 07:43 PM)Erhino Wrote: To be fair, didn't read the Stormfront thread. 

Yet you're criticizing the discussion of such a topic, in spite of the rather scholarly discussion that it is.  

What other topics should be banned from discussion?

Who said anything about banning? Sorry to burst your outrage bubble. I responded to a very specific question, why a football loving, left leaning, hall of fame poster would not post here. The point stands whether the Stormfront thread was about Chinese finger traps or kkk, racial outrage, and political outrage in general dominates the board. That is the vibe.

My comment has nothing to do with banning and is about why he wouldnâ€t care to be part of this community.

I'm wondering when Luvdabux appointed you his spokesman.

(04-17-2019, 01:00 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote:

(04-17-2019, 12:42 PM)Erhino Wrote:

(04-17-2019, 10:43 AM)K9Buck Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 07:43 PM)Erhino Wrote: To be fair, didn't read the Stormfront thread. 

Yet you're criticizing the discussion of such a topic, in spite of the rather scholarly discussion that it is.  

What other topics should be banned from discussion?

Who said anything about banning? Sorry to burst your outrage bubble. I responded to a very specific question, why a football loving, left leaning, hall of fame poster would not post here. The point stands whether the Stormfront thread was about Chinese finger traps or kkk, racial outrage, and political outrage in general dominates the board. That is the vibe.

My comment has nothing to do with banning and is about why he wouldnâ€t care to be part of this community.

I'm wondering when Luvdabux appointed you his spokesman.

At the LA Rams fan blast hosted by Torry Holt and Roman Gabriel.

(04-17-2019, 01:00 PM)3rdgensooner Wrote:

(04-17-2019, 12:42 PM)Erhino Wrote:

(04-17-2019, 10:43 AM)K9Buck Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 07:43 PM)Erhino Wrote: To be fair, didn't read the Stormfront thread. 

Yet you're criticizing the discussion of such a topic, in spite of the rather scholarly discussion that it is.  

What other topics should be banned from discussion?

Who said anything about banning? Sorry to burst your outrage bubble. I responded to a very specific question, why a football loving, left leaning, hall of fame poster would not post here. The point stands whether the Stormfront thread was about Chinese finger traps or kkk, racial outrage, and political outrage in general dominates the board. That is the vibe.

My comment has nothing to do with banning and is about why he wouldnâ€t care to be part of this community.

I'm wondering when Luvdabux appointed you his spokesman.

Maybe they are one and the same.

Rhino, were you relieved and happy not to find any racist statements by members here?  Or were you disappointed?

(04-17-2019, 12:42 PM)Erhino Wrote:

(04-17-2019, 10:43 AM)K9Buck Wrote:

(04-16-2019, 07:43 PM)Erhino Wrote: To be fair, didn't read the Stormfront thread. 

Yet you're criticizing the discussion of such a topic, in spite of the rather scholarly discussion that it is.  

What other topics should be banned from discussion?

Who said anything about banning? Sorry to burst your outrage bubble. I responded to a very specific question, why a football loving, left leaning, hall of fame poster would not post here. The point stands whether the Stormfront thread was about Chinese finger traps or kkk, racial outrage, and political outrage in general dominates the board. That is the vibe.

My comment has nothing to do with banning and is about why he wouldnâ€t care to be part of this community.

To be fair, the thread was titled Stormfront, but contained zero endorsement or justification for that craphole. I understand what you are saying, but there are much better examples to be had,imo.

I was asked prior to posting about the Stormfront thread if I'd allow it.  I said yes because I'm not going stifle discussion.  Why can't we discuss it?  And no one is stopping Luxdabux from posting.   No one.

I always liked the Wolfman. We had some good talks and always wished each other Merry Christmas by PM. We did t always see eye to eye, but Luvda is good people. I'd like to see him here. But why Rhino decides to give his two cents why another poster won't come here is head scratching tho.

If I create a thread on cancer, is it necessary to title the thread "Cancer is bad" as opposed to just "Cancer"?

Rather than being honest and acknowledging his mistakes, Rhino ran off. Maddy used to do that. He'd make an erroneous statement, be proven wrong and then disappear.

Let's be honest.  The Left/Democrats want and are used to a rigged game in terms of discussion.  They read the MSM and assume anyone who doesn't agree with those daily narratives is a racist, sexist, fringe gun nut, etc.  They simply cannot deal with an open honest discussion of issues.  Somenole gets lauded on here by some but he is just like I said and he won't post here on a regular basis because the narratives and ideas he buys into cannot stand up to the scrutiny of a real challenge so he runs away just like the rest of them.

(04-17-2019, 01:29 PM)Hightop77 Wrote: Let's be honest.  The Left/Democrats want and are used to a rigged game in terms of discussion.  They read the MSM and assume anyone who doesn't agree with those daily narratives is a racist, sexist, fringe gun nut, etc.  They simply cannot deal with an open honest discussion of issues.  Somenole gets lauded on here by some but he is just like I said and he won't post here on a regular basis because the narratives and ideas he buys into cannot stand up to the scrutiny of a real challenge so he runs away just like the rest of them.

Agreed.