So? We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit? They entered without preconceived notions, right? There isnâ€t anything hinky? Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”? Name alone lowers credibility. Right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(05-13-2021, 10:08 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 09:58 PM)Hightop77 Wrote: Watch for Merrick Garland to send the FBI in there soon to shut this down before they figure out that Trump really did win the election.

I saw it mentioned on a YT clip the other day that the DOJ is down there.  If you think they're down there to ensure election integrity I have a Russian Collusion story to sell you.  

I gotta say that it is amusing to read articles that often state things like "...false election conspiracy theory..."  when there hasn't been a legit, full audit carried out yet.  Does that sound like a legitimate news media to you?

Garland isn't going to just sit back while the civil rights of all those illegals and dead people who voted are violated.

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So? We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit? They entered without preconceived notions, right? There isnâ€t anything hinky? Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”? Name alone lowers credibility. Right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lots of IT companies have names like that. #geeksquad (best buy), a local IT company in ohio is named similarly.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So?  We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit?  They entered without preconceived notions, right?  There isnâ€t anything hinky?  Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”?  Name alone lowers credibility. Right? 


Sent from my iPhone using

How do they definitively say itâ€s a false claim/conspiracy theory when every attempt to seriously look at these elections have been fought tooth and nail?  As of yet there has been no definitive outcome, yet the claims are false?  They donâ€t know that.  Thatâ€s not reporting.  Thatâ€s propaganda

(05-14-2021, 06:55 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So?  We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit?  They entered without preconceived notions, right?  There isnâ€t anything hinky?  Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”?  Name alone lowers credibility. Right? 


Sent from my iPhone using

How do they definitively say itâ€s a false claim/conspiracy theory when every attempt to seriously look at these elections have been fought tooth and nail?  As of yet there has been no definitive outcome, yet the claims are false?  They donâ€t know that.  Thatâ€s not reporting.  Thatâ€s propaganda

Thatâ€s not my point. There are still issues with this audit concerning transparency and who is doing it. This election issue is going to become a circular argument real quick.

Edit. It actually wonâ€t be circular. It will be both sides saying the same thing about the other. Iâ€m not sure what kind of argument that is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(05-13-2021, 09:56 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 10:45 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 09:37 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The dems have been caught shredding ballots, throwing away envelopes with signatures, boarding up windows so observers couldn't see what's going on, closing up multiple blue district strongholds in the middle of their counting, but leaving handfuls of people to still count (without observers) and yet we're all just supposed to buy their lie.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You, and about half the country, swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker.

So I will ask again do you believe Joe Biden got 81 million legal votes?

Waiting for your reply Pitch

(05-14-2021, 11:22 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 09:56 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 10:45 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 09:37 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The dems have been caught shredding ballots, throwing away envelopes with signatures, boarding up windows so observers couldn't see what's going on, closing up multiple blue district strongholds in the middle of their counting, but leaving handfuls of people to still count (without observers) and yet we're all just supposed to buy their lie.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You, and about half the country, swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker.

So I will ask again do you believe Joe Biden got 81 million legal votes?

Waiting for your reply Pitch

Biden only got 79,999,980 totally legitimate and lawful votes.

Signed pitch

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

(05-13-2021, 09:56 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 10:45 AM)P1tchblack Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 09:37 AM)davebucknut Wrote: The dems have been caught shredding ballots, throwing away envelopes with signatures, boarding up windows so observers couldn't see what's going on, closing up multiple blue district strongholds in the middle of their counting, but leaving handfuls of people to still count (without observers) and yet we're all just supposed to buy their lie.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You, and about half the country, swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker.

So I will ask again do you believe Joe Biden got 81 million legal votes?

No. There's always a small amount of fraud.

(05-14-2021, 07:24 AM)Georgem80 Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 06:55 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So?  We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit?  They entered without preconceived notions, right?  There isnâ€t anything hinky?  Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”?  Name alone lowers credibility. Right? 


Sent from my iPhone using

How do they definitively say itâ€s a false claim/conspiracy theory when every attempt to seriously look at these elections have been fought tooth and nail?  As of yet there has been no definitive outcome, yet the claims are false?  They donâ€t know that.  Thatâ€s not reporting.  Thatâ€s propaganda

Thatâ€s not my point.  There are still issues with this audit concerning transparency and who is doing it. This election issue is going to become a circular argument real quick. 

Edit. It actually wonâ€t be circular.  It will be both sides saying the same thing about the other.  Iâ€m not sure what kind of argument that is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which third-party company would you feel comfortable with in doing the audit? Google, maybe? Did you have any worries about the business ethics of cyber security firm cyberninjas before they took over the audit, or did that start after they took over the audit (i.e. after left leaning media begain throwing shade at the firm)?

(05-15-2021, 07:40 AM)Broly Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 07:24 AM)Georgem80 Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 06:55 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So?  We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit?  They entered without preconceived notions, right?  There isnâ€t anything hinky?  Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”?  Name alone lowers credibility. Right? 


Sent from my iPhone using

How do they definitively say itâ€s a false claim/conspiracy theory when every attempt to seriously look at these elections have been fought tooth and nail?  As of yet there has been no definitive outcome, yet the claims are false?  They donâ€t know that.  Thatâ€s not reporting.  Thatâ€s propaganda

Thatâ€s not my point.  There are still issues with this audit concerning transparency and who is doing it. This election issue is going to become a circular argument real quick. 

Edit. It actually wonâ€t be circular.  It will be both sides saying the same thing about the other.  Iâ€m not sure what kind of argument that is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which third-party company would you feel comfortable with in doing the audit? Google, maybe? Did you have any worries about the business ethics of cyber security firm cyberninjas before they took over the audit, or did that start after they took over the audit (i.e. after left leaning media begain throwing shade at the firm)?

Honestly, You missed my point. Even though I made my point twice.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the funniest sh1t with this is Stacy Abrams and claims of voter suppression.   Uhhhhh... 1.  The election was in November.  2.  Yeah, this might suppress the "votes" of cheaters going forward, etc...  and????   

Seriously though, why does our media give a microsecond of time to a lunatic like that?  I know she has/had a prominent role in Georgia politics, but when someone says something that profoundly stupid (she was on CNN with the Vanderbilt heir) it's time to slowly remove your mic and have the camera crew just calmly step away.

(05-15-2021, 08:07 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: Honestly, You missed my point. Even though I made my point twice.

You made no point, because you aren't very bright.

Denigrating the company purely because they have a silly name is nothing more than shooting the messenger rather than address the message directly.

(05-13-2021, 10:08 PM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-13-2021, 09:58 PM)Hightop77 Wrote: Watch for Merrick Garland to send the FBI in there soon to shut this down before they figure out that Trump really did win the election.

I saw it mentioned on a YT clip the other day that the DOJ is down there.  If you think they're down there to ensure election integrity I have a Russian Collusion story to sell you.  

I gotta say that it is amusing to read articles that often state things like "...false election conspiracy theory..."  when there hasn't been a legit, full audit carried out yet.  Does that sound like a legitimate news media to you?

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So?  We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit?  They entered without preconceived notions, right?  There isnâ€t anything hinky?  Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”?  Name alone lowers credibility. Right? 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just want to clarify this before going any further.  I introduced a point about bad journalism.  George you immediately responded in the post right after mine.  I assumed you were at least in part addressing my point and then pivoting. 

Again, my point was in regards to the journalism that is not being practiced in this nation anymore

(05-15-2021, 08:07 AM)Georgem80 Wrote:

(05-15-2021, 07:40 AM)Broly Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 07:24 AM)Georgem80 Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 06:55 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote:

(05-14-2021, 05:13 AM)Georgem80 Wrote: So?  We just believe the group thatâ€s doing the audit?  They entered without preconceived notions, right?  There isnâ€t anything hinky?  Looking for bamboo? How can we trust “cyber ninjas”?  Name alone lowers credibility. Right? 


Sent from my iPhone using

How do they definitively say itâ€s a false claim/conspiracy theory when every attempt to seriously look at these elections have been fought tooth and nail?  As of yet there has been no definitive outcome, yet the claims are false?  They donâ€t know that.  Thatâ€s not reporting.  Thatâ€s propaganda

Thatâ€s not my point.  There are still issues with this audit concerning transparency and who is doing it. This election issue is going to become a circular argument real quick. 

Edit. It actually wonâ€t be circular.  It will be both sides saying the same thing about the other.  Iâ€m not sure what kind of argument that is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which third-party company would you feel comfortable with in doing the audit? Google, maybe? Did you have any worries about the business ethics of  cyber security firm cyberninjas before they took over the audit, or did that start after they took over the audit (i.e. after left leaning media begain throwing shade at the firm)?

Honestly, You missed my point. Even though I made my point twice.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"Thatâ€s not my point.  There are still issues with this audit concerning transparency and who is doing it. This election issue is going to become a circular argument real quick." 
Really? My whole post was related to the "who is doing it"................

If the results of the machine audits are an open book then I'm not really getting the concern.  If flaws are apparent in their conclusions I'm quite sure they would be pointed out and then magnified a thousand fold in the media. 

Back to the media for a second.  They have created their own reality over the last 5+ years.  They have half the nation buying in and then thinking the other half of the nation is living the false reality.  Maybe if you just did your effffffing job the people would figure it out.  Just report that there is an election audit going on in Arizona right now.  Report it and how it came to be.  You don't start out with stuff like  "...discredited conspiracy theories..." when there has yet to be any discrediting that has taken place.  

I just don't get the angst over this unless you have skin in the game/major concerns over what will be revealed.  It's an audit.  Let it play.  

These should all be going on in the key swing states.  

One thing I am gaining hope on is seeing some of these state legislature grabbing back their election power.  That's really the most important thing going on here.  Just need more and more states to get with it.