Posts: 7,100
Threads: 87
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
27
If a news outlet reports what others SAY, they are covered, completely.
If they go off on a tirade with no basis, they can be in trouble, as we see here.
1
Posts: 27,051
Threads: 476
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
The news media can generally lie all they want about public figures and they obviously do to suit their agendas. That is why Trump would not successfully be able to sue them while someone like Nick Sandmann can get millions.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
(02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces.
1
Posts: 4,629
Threads: 25
Joined: Sep 2020
Reputation:
6
(02-06-2021, 12:10 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces.
Not just Wisconsin. Many suits were simply filed for filing sake. The attorneys when asked to present evidence and put their career on the line wisely withdrew.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1
(02-06-2021, 12:26 PM)Georgem80 Wrote: (02-06-2021, 12:10 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces.
Not just Wisconsin. Many suits were simply filed for filing sake. The attorneys when asked to present evidence and put their career on the line wisely withdrew.Â
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gotta look busy to keep the money coming in.
Posts: 5,249
Threads: 58
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
19
02-06-2021, 12:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2021, 12:50 PM by dunefan.)
(02-06-2021, 12:26 PM)Georgem80 Wrote: (02-06-2021, 12:10 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces.
Not just Wisconsin. Many suits were simply filed for filing sake. The attorneys when asked to present evidence and put their career on the line wisely withdrew.Â
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sorry, how many sworn statements were presented to a jury? How many independent examinations were done examining the actual votes, signatures, voting roles and the voting machines? The swamp won. Rejoice. Your side won. Filibuster gone, packed courts, open boarders, college bills forgiven (except mine), free medical, free college, national mail-in voting and one side government. Enjoy your utopia.
Edit: Trying to take guns away (either by confiscation or trying to tax the away or whatever) will be a final straw for many people and will not go unchallenged.
Posts: 5,146
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
28
(02-06-2021, 12:10 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces. And in PA?
Posts: 7,100
Threads: 87
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
27
Incidentally, Dobbs may still be employed by Fox. Or not.
They may be applying pressure on him to go on air and recant his claims.
Posts: 27,051
Threads: 476
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
70
Dobbs is still under contract with Fox but I doubt he will be going back on the air. They want to get back to catering to the GOP establishment on things like immigration and Dobbs clearly doesn't fit into that.
"Hightop can reduce an entire message board of men to mudsharks. It's actually pretty funny to watch."
Posts: 4,629
Threads: 25
Joined: Sep 2020
Reputation:
6
02-06-2021, 01:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2021, 01:06 PM by Georgem80.)
(02-06-2021, 12:47 PM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 12:26 PM)Georgem80 Wrote: (02-06-2021, 12:10 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces.
Not just Wisconsin. Many suits were simply filed for filing sake. The attorneys when asked to present evidence and put their career on the line wisely withdrew.Â
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sorry, how many sworn statements were presented to a jury? How many independent examinations were done examining the actual votes, signatures, voting roles and the voting machines? The swamp won. Rejoice. Your side won. Filibuster gone, packed courts, open boarders, college bills forgiven (except mine), free medical, free college, national mail-in voting and one side government. Enjoy your utopia.
Edit: Trying to take guns away (either by confiscation or trying to tax the away or whatever) will be a final straw for many people and will not go unchallenged.
How many judges asked for those only to have the cases redrawn?
You don†t know me. I hate the your side my side argument. It†s ignorant in its nature. I have said before the need to protect the filibuster, even if it†s great in was nefarious at best.
I†m not fir any kind of confiscation. But I do love usage taxes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posts: 7,100
Threads: 87
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
27
What is the most clear cut sworn statement made by anyone that has no alternative explanation?
(02-06-2021, 12:53 PM)Soupcity Kid Wrote: (02-06-2021, 12:10 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (02-06-2021, 11:54 AM)dunefan Wrote: (02-06-2021, 10:24 AM)somenole Wrote: “Eight weeks from the election and we still donâ€t have verifiable, tangible support for the crimes that everyone knows were committed...†Lou Dobbs said on air in January. Repeated here in the Nuthouse, often. Thatâ€s such a touchy - feely thing to say. He (and you guys) just knows, without any proof, that something was wrong.
Just imagine what would have happened if just ONE lawsuit was allowed to go to trial. JUST ONE. Oh, you can't because they weren't allowed. The swamp finally won and the last coup finally worked. Enjoy the world you've brought your children and grandchildren. I hope you have a nice long life so you can see it personally.
Trump's lawsuits weren't about voter fraud. They were questioning government procedure as it relates to changes in voting laws in some states. When Trump's lawyers were given a chance to present their case in Wisconsin, they fell flat in their faces. And in PA?
What specifically are you referring to?
|