Posts: 5,146
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
25
I guess there is a question that I do not understand the answer.
The question was if Pitch had a daughter and his daughter was getting pummeled by this teenager how would he want the police officer to handle the girl beating his daughter?
Posts: 36,966
Threads: 3,245
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
58
(03-17-2019, 09:29 AM)Soupcity Kid Wrote: I guess there is a question that I do not understand the answer.
The question was if Pitch had a daughter and his daughter was getting pummeled by this teenager how would he want the police officer to handle the girl beating his daughter?
He cannot answer sincerely as it will expose his misguided thinking. I boxed him in....hehehe
Make America Honest Again
(03-17-2019, 08:29 AM)zigbee Wrote: These long posts you string together really doesnâ€t help your argument in the least.
Weâ€ll do the poll
The cop you admit has to arrest due to activity which is perceived to break law.  The courts decide innocence , all teens are different as are situations and if it took a body slam to save your daughter youâ€d be ok with that,  you by agreeing to you changed your original position for most part.
Thanks for admitting you are wrong as usual
The incident (girl v girl) took place on a bus. They weren't on a bus when the cop body-slammed her, so the cop wasn't saving anyone's life at that point. Â
I've already addressed this:
Boy, that is a stretch. Slamming your daughter  for not going to bed is the same as the girl beating the hell out of another girl?  Come on, man. You are now desperate here.
At the time the interaction between the cop and girl occurred, she wasn't beating the hell out of anyone. All she was doing was resisting.
 Would you be OK with the officer just trying his best but afraid to stop if it meant a body slam on a girl as she beat THE HELL out of YOUR Daughter? I bet not.
If the cop actually yanked her off of the girl, I might have a different attitude because it would be different circumstances.
Posts: 5,146
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
25
(03-17-2019, 09:32 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 09:29 AM)Soupcity Kid Wrote: I guess there is a question that I do not understand the answer.
The question was if Pitch had a daughter and his daughter was getting pummeled by this teenager how would he want the police officer to handle the girl beating his daughter?
He cannot answer sincerely as it will expose his misguided thinking. I boxed him in....hehehe
Again he did not answer your question and sort of reframed it as if the "officer yanked his daughter off of her"?
Posts: 3,272
Threads: 143
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
17
03-17-2019, 10:02 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-17-2019, 10:03 AM by BigDroppa.)
Love to see chics get thrown down by cops. F em.
Posts: 36,966
Threads: 3,245
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
58
(03-17-2019, 09:50 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 08:29 AM)zigbee Wrote: These long posts you string together really doesnâ€t help your argument in the least.
Weâ€ll do the poll
The cop you admit has to arrest due to activity which is perceived to break law.  The courts decide innocence , all teens are different as are situations and if it took a body slam to save your daughter youâ€d be ok with that,  you by agreeing to you changed your original position for most part.
Thanks for admitting you are wrong as usual
The incident (girl v girl) took place on a bus. They weren't on a bus when the cop body-slammed her, so the cop wasn't saving anyone's life at that point. Â
I've already addressed this:
Boy, that is a stretch. Slamming your daughter  for not going to bed is the same as the girl beating the hell out of another girl?  Come on, man. You are now desperate here.
At the time the interaction between the cop and girl occurred, she wasn't beating the hell out of anyone. All she was doing was resisting.
 Would you be OK with the officer just trying his best but afraid to stop if it meant a body slam on a girl as she beat THE HELL out of YOUR Daughter? I bet not.
If the cop actually yanked her off of the girl, I might have a different attitude because it would be different circumstances.
So, just because the incident happened on a bus and when the accused was asked for compliance to be taken in YOU KNOW FOR SURE the cop could have done this without body slamming? You know FOR SURE this girl was not a threat? You think ALL situations and girls are the same? You still did not answer the question. IF this girl beat the hell out of your daughter, and the ONLY WAY to get her under control was a slam to arrest you'd be ok with the cop just standing there and not doing much? Letting the girl flay away at cop and whomever? Just try your best as an officer and if you get hit in the face no big deal? You have TWO answers here. Either you think she should be body slammed after the attack because she beat the hell out of your daughter and would not comply AFTER getting off the bus or you think the officer should risk getting hit himself. JUST RESISTING means the officer could be hit by the girl. You minimize resisting conveniently.  No other way to respond. Just answer.
Make America Honest Again
Posts: 5,146
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
25
The eating popcorn emoji would fit in so well here.
(03-17-2019, 10:06 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 09:50 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 08:29 AM)zigbee Wrote: These long posts you string together really doesnâ€t help your argument in the least.
Weâ€ll do the poll
The cop you admit has to arrest due to activity which is perceived to break law.  The courts decide innocence , all teens are different as are situations and if it took a body slam to save your daughter youâ€d be ok with that,  you by agreeing to you changed your original position for most part.
Thanks for admitting you are wrong as usual
The incident (girl v girl) took place on a bus. They weren't on a bus when the cop body-slammed her, so the cop wasn't saving anyone's life at that point. Â
I've already addressed this:
Boy, that is a stretch. Slamming your daughter  for not going to bed is the same as the girl beating the hell out of another girl?  Come on, man. You are now desperate here.
At the time the interaction between the cop and girl occurred, she wasn't beating the hell out of anyone. All she was doing was resisting.
 Would you be OK with the officer just trying his best but afraid to stop if it meant a body slam on a girl as she beat THE HELL out of YOUR Daughter? I bet not.
If the cop actually yanked her off of the girl, I might have a different attitude because it would be different circumstances.
So, just because the incident happened on a bus and when the accused was asked for compliance to be taken in YOU KNOW FOR SURE the cop could have done this without body slamming? You know FOR SURE this girl was not a threat? You think ALL situations and girls are the same? You still did not answer the question. IF this girl beat the hell out of your daughter, and the ONLY WAY to get her under control was a slam to arrest you'd be ok with the cop just standing there and not doing much? Letting the girl flay away at cop and whomever? Just try your best as an officer and if you get hit in the face no big deal? You have TWO answers here. Either you think she should be body slammed after the attack because she beat the hell out of your daughter and would not comply AFTER getting off the bus or you think the officer should risk getting hit himself.  JUST RESISTING means the officer could be hit by the girl. You minimize resisting conveniently.  No other way to respond. Just answer.
If the girl was attacking another girl WHEN THE COP ARRIVED and , for some reason, he (an adult male with probably 65-75 lbs on her) was unable get control of her using other restraining methods, I would be ok with him slamming her to the ground as an absolute last resort and to protect the other girl . However, as was shown in the other two videos in this thread, and on this forum, cops often do unnecessary things because they're mad or believe, like many people here, that it's law enforcement's job to punish people.
Posts: 36,966
Threads: 3,245
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
58
(03-17-2019, 10:23 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 10:06 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 09:50 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 08:29 AM)zigbee Wrote: These long posts you string together really doesnâ€t help your argument in the least.
Weâ€ll do the poll
The cop you admit has to arrest due to activity which is perceived to break law.  The courts decide innocence , all teens are different as are situations and if it took a body slam to save your daughter youâ€d be ok with that,  you by agreeing to you changed your original position for most part.
Thanks for admitting you are wrong as usual
The incident (girl v girl) took place on a bus. They weren't on a bus when the cop body-slammed her, so the cop wasn't saving anyone's life at that point. Â
I've already addressed this:
Boy, that is a stretch. Slamming your daughter  for not going to bed is the same as the girl beating the hell out of another girl?  Come on, man. You are now desperate here.
At the time the interaction between the cop and girl occurred, she wasn't beating the hell out of anyone. All she was doing was resisting.
 Would you be OK with the officer just trying his best but afraid to stop if it meant a body slam on a girl as she beat THE HELL out of YOUR Daughter? I bet not.
If the cop actually yanked her off of the girl, I might have a different attitude because it would be different circumstances.
So, just because the incident happened on a bus and when the accused was asked for compliance to be taken in YOU KNOW FOR SURE the cop could have done this without body slamming? You know FOR SURE this girl was not a threat? You think ALL situations and girls are the same? You still did not answer the question. IF this girl beat the hell out of your daughter, and the ONLY WAY to get her under control was a slam to arrest you'd be ok with the cop just standing there and not doing much? Letting the girl flay away at cop and whomever? Just try your best as an officer and if you get hit in the face no big deal? You have TWO answers here. Either you think she should be body slammed after the attack because she beat the hell out of your daughter and would not comply AFTER getting off the bus or you think the officer should risk getting hit himself.  JUST RESISTING means the officer could be hit by the girl. You minimize resisting conveniently.  No other way to respond. Just answer.
If the girl was attacking another girl WHEN THE COP ARRIVED and , for some reason, he (an adult male with probably 65-75 lbs on her) was unable get control of her using other restraining methods, I would be ok with him slamming her to the ground . However, as was shown in the other two videos in this thread, and on this forum, cops often do unnecessary things because they're mad or believe, like many people here, that it's law enforcement's job to punish people.
THERE it is. You admit he may of had to do this. Was it that hard? And of course you throw in a disclaimer here to save face. You are exposed my friend. We knew this before you posted this anyway but it's confirmation. NO ONE argues this never happens. It does. What most of us maintain is in some cases a body slam is necessary. Thanks for FINALLY admitting this.  And I want you to point out WHO on here says it's law enforcement job to punish people? Please link this.  Thanks.
Make America Honest Again
(03-17-2019, 10:27 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 10:23 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 10:06 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 09:50 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 08:29 AM)zigbee Wrote: These long posts you string together really doesnâ€t help your argument in the least.
Weâ€ll do the poll
The cop you admit has to arrest due to activity which is perceived to break law.  The courts decide innocence , all teens are different as are situations and if it took a body slam to save your daughter youâ€d be ok with that,  you by agreeing to you changed your original position for most part.
Thanks for admitting you are wrong as usual
The incident (girl v girl) took place on a bus. They weren't on a bus when the cop body-slammed her, so the cop wasn't saving anyone's life at that point. Â
I've already addressed this:
Boy, that is a stretch. Slamming your daughter  for not going to bed is the same as the girl beating the hell out of another girl?  Come on, man. You are now desperate here.
At the time the interaction between the cop and girl occurred, she wasn't beating the hell out of anyone. All she was doing was resisting.
 Would you be OK with the officer just trying his best but afraid to stop if it meant a body slam on a girl as she beat THE HELL out of YOUR Daughter? I bet not.
If the cop actually yanked her off of the girl, I might have a different attitude because it would be different circumstances.
So, just because the incident happened on a bus and when the accused was asked for compliance to be taken in YOU KNOW FOR SURE the cop could have done this without body slamming? You know FOR SURE this girl was not a threat? You think ALL situations and girls are the same? You still did not answer the question. IF this girl beat the hell out of your daughter, and the ONLY WAY to get her under control was a slam to arrest you'd be ok with the cop just standing there and not doing much? Letting the girl flay away at cop and whomever? Just try your best as an officer and if you get hit in the face no big deal? You have TWO answers here. Either you think she should be body slammed after the attack because she beat the hell out of your daughter and would not comply AFTER getting off the bus or you think the officer should risk getting hit himself.  JUST RESISTING means the officer could be hit by the girl. You minimize resisting conveniently.  No other way to respond. Just answer.
If the girl was attacking another girl WHEN THE COP ARRIVED and , for some reason, he (an adult male with probably 65-75 lbs on her) was unable get control of her using other restraining methods, I would be ok with him slamming her to the ground . However, as was shown in the other two videos in this thread, and on this forum, cops often do unnecessary things because they're mad or believe, like many people here, that it's law enforcement's job to punish people.
THERE it is. You admit he may of had to do this. Was it that hard? And of course you throw in a disclaimer here to save face. You are exposed my friend.Â
As I've said multiple times, I'm ok with him body-slamming her to protect the other girl. As I've also said multiple times, the fight took place on the bus, so at the point he arrived, the fight was over.Â
We knew this before you posted this anyway but it's confirmation. NO ONE argues this never happens. It does. What most of us maintain is in some cases a body slam is necessary. Thanks for FINALLY admitting this. Â
As I said above, in situtations where a cop needs to protect the life of someone, yes. That wasn't the case here.
And I want you to point out WHO on here says it's law enforcement job to punish people? Please link this.  Thanks.
Everyone that supported a cop kicking in the head/curb stomping a handcuffed suspect on the previous forum. They'll have to out themselves because I have no way of going back in time.
Posts: 36,966
Threads: 3,245
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
58
(03-17-2019, 10:41 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 10:27 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 10:23 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (03-17-2019, 10:06 AM)zigbee Wrote: (03-17-2019, 09:50 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: The incident (girl v girl) took place on a bus. They weren't on a bus when the cop body-slammed her, so the cop wasn't saving anyone's life at that point. Â
I've already addressed this:
Boy, that is a stretch. Slamming your daughter  for not going to bed is the same as the girl beating the hell out of another girl?  Come on, man. You are now desperate here.
At the time the interaction between the cop and girl occurred, she wasn't beating the hell out of anyone. All she was doing was resisting.
 Would you be OK with the officer just trying his best but afraid to stop if it meant a body slam on a girl as she beat THE HELL out of YOUR Daughter? I bet not.
If the cop actually yanked her off of the girl, I might have a different attitude because it would be different circumstances.
So, just because the incident happened on a bus and when the accused was asked for compliance to be taken in YOU KNOW FOR SURE the cop could have done this without body slamming? You know FOR SURE this girl was not a threat? You think ALL situations and girls are the same? You still did not answer the question. IF this girl beat the hell out of your daughter, and the ONLY WAY to get her under control was a slam to arrest you'd be ok with the cop just standing there and not doing much? Letting the girl flay away at cop and whomever? Just try your best as an officer and if you get hit in the face no big deal? You have TWO answers here. Either you think she should be body slammed after the attack because she beat the hell out of your daughter and would not comply AFTER getting off the bus or you think the officer should risk getting hit himself.  JUST RESISTING means the officer could be hit by the girl. You minimize resisting conveniently.  No other way to respond. Just answer.
If the girl was attacking another girl WHEN THE COP ARRIVED and , for some reason, he (an adult male with probably 65-75 lbs on her) was unable get control of her using other restraining methods, I would be ok with him slamming her to the ground . However, as was shown in the other two videos in this thread, and on this forum, cops often do unnecessary things because they're mad or believe, like many people here, that it's law enforcement's job to punish people.
THERE it is. You admit he may of had to do this. Was it that hard? And of course you throw in a disclaimer here to save face. You are exposed my friend.Â
As I've said multiple times, I'm ok with him body-slamming her to protect the other girl. As I've also said multiple times, the fight took place on the bus, so at the point he arrived, the fight was over.Â
We knew this before you posted this anyway but it's confirmation. NO ONE argues this never happens. It does. What most of us maintain is in some cases a body slam is necessary. Thanks for FINALLY admitting this. Â
As I said above, in situtations where a cop needs to protect the life of someone, yes. That wasn't the case here.
And I want you to point out WHO on here says it's law enforcement job to punish people? Please link this.  Thanks.
Everyone that supported a cop kicking in the head/curb stomping a handcuffed suspect on the previous forum. They'll have to out themselves because I have no way of going back in time.
Then it's in your mind as to the people who support this since you can't back it up.  Thanks again.  Again, thanks for agreeing with what all of have been maintaining about cops and subduing criminals.  Appreciate it.
Make America Honest Again
^^^also, you missed my ongoing sarcastic comments about a "man", "adult male" etc NEEDING to body slam a teenage girl.^^^ I don't believe that an adult male, with the size advantage he had, would every truly NEED to body slam a teenager to control her, but I'm open to the possibility just in case there was a dainty, undersized male cop.
|