I like thin mints, but....

[Hightop77]

This here is the reason I just can't go Libertarian......they make sense.....till they don't.

I keep telling you, the Libertarian Party is not really about smaller less obtrusive government.  It is just part of the open borders and drug legalization movement.  The reason it makes no sense any more is most of their members use various forms of recreational illegal drugs.  Exhibit A is right in front of you.

[P1tchblack]

There is no disputing your comment. Your comment is actually stupid. We're discussing an illegal drug and your comment is "He's selling things to people who want what he's selling." as a "consensual transaction". There is no disputing your stupidity (Aleppo).

You are to the Libertarian as AOC is to the Democrat.

it's a consensual transaction between two consenting adults.  Person A wants to sell a product and Person B wants to buy it.  The act, in itself, isn't a crime.

Buying stolen iphones or illegal drugs from another person is a crime. Change your username to 3v.

buying stolen property is a crime, yes....because it's stolen.

Now, explain buying fentanyl.

I get that the government wants us to believe that two people doing a transaction is "illegal" because of what is being bought/sold.  The government also wants us to believe that it's ok to extort money from me for not wearing my seat belt.  is the transaction technically illegal? yes.  is the transaction, in itself, wrong?  No.  Both people are willing participants.

[3rdgensooner]

Interesting. So I should open a pill mill. Sell the opiates to whomever and make some bank. No problem. 
Libertarianism isn't anarchy bud and preying on people is an area where gummint and society has a legitimate interest in regulating including making it criminal to do so. 
Now even if it was legal for him to distribute fentanyl on the street to addicts he's still a low life scumbag POS. Hope the boys in the pen will accept cookies in lieu of getting their salads tossed. Actually I don't.

[va1bucksfan1]

I have yet to see a "libertarian" on this board who isn't actually a stoner whining about drugs/weed being illegal. They hide for a while behind a bunch of other libertarian ideals, but the true focus of their "libertarian" enthusiasm always eventually comes forward - drug/pot legalization.

[lrrps21]

I have yet to see a "libertarian" on this board who isn't actually a stoner whining about drugs/weed being illegal.  They hide for a while behind a bunch of other libertarian ideals, but the true focus of their "libertarian" enthusiasm always eventually comes forward - drug/pot legalization.

Now, you know why Libertarians want open borders.

[P1tchblack]

Interesting. So I should open a pill mill. Sell the opiates to whomever and make some bank. No problem. 
Libertarianism isn't anarchy bud and preying on people is an area where gummint and society has a legitimate interest in regulating including making it criminal to do so. 
Now even if it was legal for him to distribute fentanyl on the street to addicts he's still a low life scumbag POS. Hope the boys in the pen will accept cookies in lieu of getting their salads tossed. Actually I don't.

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

[va1bucksfan1]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

[P1tchblack]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

[Alabuckeye]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

[va1bucksfan1]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

Yup.  Pitch likes the limitations on people that he likes, and then turns around and whines about how overbearing the government is about limitations he doesn't like.

Cherry-picking faux outrage.

[P1tchblack]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

apply morality?  in what way?

[Alabuckeye]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

apply morality?  in what way?

you are saying it's immoral for an 8 year old to decide to show off her body.

[va1bucksfan1]

If I'm able to make something that you want and you're willing to buy it, why should the government be involved?

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

apply morality?  in what way?

Is your IQ north of 50?  This was a crystal clear comment by Ala.

[P1tchblack]

 
So an 8 year old girl who wants to show off her body should be able to sell her nude photos to a 25 year child porn pedophile willing to buy them, and that shouldn't be a crime?

You're not only a demonstrably stupid person, you're quite a disgusting sicko as well.

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

apply morality?  in what way?

you are saying it's immoral for an 8 year old to decide to show off her body.

I'm saying that children, and even some adults, can't be trusted to make decisions about everything.

[3rdgensooner]

I thought I had clarified this enough times previously...

This applies to adults.

So, you are willing to use the government to apply morality, just at a different level.....

apply morality?  in what way?

you are saying it's immoral for an 8 year old to decide to show off her body.

I'm saying that children, and even some adults, can't be trusted to make decisions about everything.

Oh rry? And who decides? Could that include drug addicts? Hmmm?