(12-04-2019, 05:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: Iâ€ve noticed an interesting dynamic in the NH regarding atheism issues. Everyone will jump on pitch and call him a troll, squawk, whatever, but wonâ€t respond to 3rdgen when he offers a far more scornful and incisive take on the same issue, from the same POV. Playground politics......
pitch isn't interested in discussion when it comes to cops and courts and Jesus.
(12-04-2019, 05:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: Iâ€ve noticed an interesting dynamic in the NH regarding atheism issues. Everyone will jump on pitch and call him a troll, squawk, whatever, but wonâ€t respond to 3rdgen when he offers a far more scornful and incisive take on the same issue, from the same POV. Playground politics......  3gs approach, at least in our exchanges when we disagree, is as follows:
If you don't accept everything he says, he will insult you and then disappear for most of the rest of the day.
(12-04-2019, 06:14 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 05:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: Iâ€ve noticed an interesting dynamic in the NH regarding atheism issues. Everyone will jump on pitch and call him a troll, squawk, whatever, but wonâ€t respond to 3rdgen when he offers a far more scornful and incisive take on the same issue, from the same POV. Playground politics......
pitch isn't interested in discussion when it comes to cops and courts and Jesus.
Absolute BS.
(12-04-2019, 07:17 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 06:14 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 05:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: Iâ€ve noticed an interesting dynamic in the NH regarding atheism issues. Everyone will jump on pitch and call him a troll, squawk, whatever, but wonâ€t respond to 3rdgen when he offers a far more scornful and incisive take on the same issue, from the same POV. Playground politics......
pitch isn't interested in discussion when it comes to cops and courts and Jesus.
Absolute BS.
No, not BS. You're interested in 1. demonizing those groups and 2. ignoring objective facts that challenge your position.
(12-04-2019, 07:32 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:17 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 06:14 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 05:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: Iâ€ve noticed an interesting dynamic in the NH regarding atheism issues. Everyone will jump on pitch and call him a troll, squawk, whatever, but wonâ€t respond to 3rdgen when he offers a far more scornful and incisive take on the same issue, from the same POV. Playground politics......
pitch isn't interested in discussion when it comes to cops and courts and Jesus.
Absolute BS.
No, not BS. You're interested in 1. demonizing those groups and 2. ignoring objective facts that challenge your position.
If religious people held their religious beliefs to the same standard of evidence/ facts that they hold everything else in their lives, there would be no religion.
If you're referring, as Zigbee often does, to laws as "facts" then, yes, when discussing right/wrong, laws are meaningless to me.
(12-04-2019, 07:37 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:32 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:17 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 06:14 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 05:46 PM)stxbuck Wrote: Iâ€ve noticed an interesting dynamic in the NH regarding atheism issues. Everyone will jump on pitch and call him a troll, squawk, whatever, but wonâ€t respond to 3rdgen when he offers a far more scornful and incisive take on the same issue, from the same POV. Playground politics......
pitch isn't interested in discussion when it comes to cops and courts and Jesus.
Absolute BS.
No, not BS. You're interested in 1. demonizing those groups and 2. ignoring objective facts that challenge your position.
If religious people held their religious beliefs to the same standard of evidence/facts that they hold everything else in their lives, there would be no religion.
If you're referring, as Zigbee often does, to laws as "facts" then, yes, when discussing right/wrong, laws are meaningless to me.
Dragging Zig into this... to deflect away from the fact you're not interest in discussion or anything resembling a two-way dialogue.
(12-04-2019, 07:42 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:37 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:32 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:17 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 06:14 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: pitch isn't interested in discussion when it comes to cops and courts and Jesus.
Absolute BS.
No, not BS. You're interested in 1. demonizing those groups and 2. ignoring objective facts that challenge your position.
If religious people held their religious beliefs to the same standard of evidence/facts that they hold everything else in their lives, there would be no religion.
If you're referring, as Zigbee often does, to laws as "facts" then, yes, when discussing right/wrong, laws are meaningless to me.
Dragging Zig into this... to deflect away from the fact you're not interest in discussion or anything resembling a two-way dialogue.
I will gladly participate in a 2 way dialogue. I'm just adding a caveat that legal/illegal is not anywhere the same as right/wrong.
(12-04-2019, 07:47 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:42 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: Dragging Zig into this... to deflect away from the fact you're not interest in discussion or anything resembling a two-way dialogue.
I will gladly participate in a 2 way dialogue. I'm just adding a caveat that legal/illegal is not anywhere the same as right/wrong.
When discussing cops and courts, the issue is absolutely about illegal vs legal... to say otherwise is simply misguided.
(12-05-2019, 09:00 AM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:47 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:42 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: Dragging Zig into this... to deflect away from the fact you're not interest in discussion or anything resembling a two-way dialogue.
I will gladly participate in a 2 way dialogue. I'm just adding a caveat that legal/illegal is not anywhere the same as right/wrong.
When discussing cops and courts, the issue is absolutely about illegal vs legal... to say otherwise is simply misguided.
So, you agree with abortion because the law says it's legal, right? There's no reason to express a contrary opinion because the law is the law....
Posts: 18,300
Threads: 54
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
32
I refuse to answer moronic questions. Morons may interpret that however they wish.
stx BG in particular gets quite upset with my posts. Ala is merely too polite and secure in his faith to engage. As for the others idk.
(12-05-2019, 09:52 AM)3rdgensooner Wrote: I refuse to answer moronic questions. Morons may interpret that however they wish.
stx BG in particular gets quite upset with my posts. Ala is merely too polite and secure in his faith to engage. As for the others idk.
It's an interesting coincidence that the questions you view as 'moronic' are most often ones that you would have difficulty answering while maintaining your position.
(12-05-2019, 09:04 AM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-05-2019, 09:00 AM)BoyGenius Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:47 PM)P1tchblack Wrote: (12-04-2019, 07:42 PM)BoyGenius Wrote: Dragging Zig into this... to deflect away from the fact you're not interest in discussion or anything resembling a two-way dialogue.
I will gladly participate in a 2 way dialogue. I'm just adding a caveat that legal/illegal is not anywhere the same as right/wrong.
When discussing cops and courts, the issue is absolutely about illegal vs legal... to say otherwise is simply misguided.
So, you agree with abortion because the law says it's legal, right? There's no reason to express a contrary opinion because the law is the law....
You selectively ignore laws when the story is inconvenient for your position.
And... abortion? You repeatedly start threads about abortion? I did not know that. That is wild and crazy stuff.
|