Republicans ask? Why aren't the leaking leakers who leak investigated?

[Hightop77]

Well, maybe this will help HighTop sleep better at night...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/john-du...inal-probe

When we hear that a prosecutor is assigned, a grand jury is empaneled and famous people who we know the names of are lawyering up because they are being subpoenaed to appear before that grand jury then we can start getting a little excited.  Somebody issuing a statement from a nameless source again means nothing.

LOOK!  It's UP THERE!  NO, it's OVER THERE!    We're DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED.

Go on record.  Give me a list of people you believe will be indicted.

I guess you didn't read what I posted above...DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED.  Go back and read what I said about Barr and all this.

Just give me your list.

[zigbee]

But you are the one who keeps defending Bill Barr and telling us that he is going to prosecute the traitors.  Why isn't he investigating the leaks and indicting those who violate the law?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....

No, I'm not defending anyone.  You are constantly confused on here about what I post.  I'm WAITING before judging.  The investigation is not done and I'm not the one acting like I know everything and condemning Barr before he even issues a thing.    I doubt you live a peaceful minute without jumping...WHO's THERE?  What's LOOKING at me?  I've got to move to a safe space!  WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOMED

Not confused at all.  Everything rational and logical and factual explaining why Barr isn't doing anything is attacked by you.  You obviously have no idea how the system works and now you act surprised that nothing is being done to the leakers and apparently don't know Barr is the one who would order and oversee those investigations and prosecutions.

Not surprised at all and not confused as I posted what lawmakers are asking.  Pretty simple really.

demanded that Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson explain why the watchdog hasn't said if it's investigating "a number of leaks of highly sensitive information" in recent years -- and released several previously unpublished texts and emails from since-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok.

Read...

[Hightop77]

But you are the one who keeps defending Bill Barr and telling us that he is going to prosecute the traitors.  Why isn't he investigating the leaks and indicting those who violate the law?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....

No, I'm not defending anyone.  You are constantly confused on here about what I post.  I'm WAITING before judging.  The investigation is not done and I'm not the one acting like I know everything and condemning Barr before he even issues a thing.    I doubt you live a peaceful minute without jumping...WHO's THERE?  What's LOOKING at me?  I've got to move to a safe space!  WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOMED

Not confused at all.  Everything rational and logical and factual explaining why Barr isn't doing anything is attacked by you.  You obviously have no idea how the system works and now you act surprised that nothing is being done to the leakers and apparently don't know Barr is the one who would order and oversee those investigations and prosecutions.

Not surprised at all and not confused as I posted what lawmakers are asking.  Pretty simple really.

demanded that Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson explain why the watchdog hasn't said if it's investigating "a number of leaks of highly sensitive information" in recent years -- and released several previously unpublished texts and emails from since-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok.

Read...

Read what?  Horowitz has already referred crimes to Barr for criminal indictment regarding leaks by Comey.  Guess what?  Barr declined to prosecute.

[zigbee]

No, I'm not defending anyone.  You are constantly confused on here about what I post.  I'm WAITING before judging.  The investigation is not done and I'm not the one acting like I know everything and condemning Barr before he even issues a thing.    I doubt you live a peaceful minute without jumping...WHO's THERE?  What's LOOKING at me?  I've got to move to a safe space!  WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOMED

Not confused at all.  Everything rational and logical and factual explaining why Barr isn't doing anything is attacked by you.  You obviously have no idea how the system works and now you act surprised that nothing is being done to the leakers and apparently don't know Barr is the one who would order and oversee those investigations and prosecutions.

Not surprised at all and not confused as I posted what lawmakers are asking.  Pretty simple really.

demanded that Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson explain why the watchdog hasn't said if it's investigating "a number of leaks of highly sensitive information" in recent years -- and released several previously unpublished texts and emails from since-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok.

Read...

Read what?  Horowitz has already referred crimes to Barr for criminal indictment regarding leaks by Comey.  Guess what?  Barr declined to prosecute.

And those he may be considering NOW are not the same he turned down.  Again, it's a process and I'm willing to see how it goes without saying for certain.  Read what I said above.  You asked for a list and I'm not predicting a thing like yourself.

[Hightop77]

Not confused at all.  Everything rational and logical and factual explaining why Barr isn't doing anything is attacked by you.  You obviously have no idea how the system works and now you act surprised that nothing is being done to the leakers and apparently don't know Barr is the one who would order and oversee those investigations and prosecutions.

Not surprised at all and not confused as I posted what lawmakers are asking.  Pretty simple really.

demanded that Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson explain why the watchdog hasn't said if it's investigating "a number of leaks of highly sensitive information" in recent years -- and released several previously unpublished texts and emails from since-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok.

Read...

Read what?  Horowitz has already referred crimes to Barr for criminal indictment regarding leaks by Comey.  Guess what?  Barr declined to prosecute.

And those he may be considering NOW are not the same he turned down.  Again, it's a process and I'm willing to see how it goes without saying for certain.  Read what I said above.  You asked for a list and I'm not predicting a thing like yourself.

Why turn any down?  Those were absolute slam dunks.  Give me your list, chicken.

[zigbee]

Not surprised at all and not confused as I posted what lawmakers are asking.  Pretty simple really.

demanded that Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson explain why the watchdog hasn't said if it's investigating "a number of leaks of highly sensitive information" in recent years -- and released several previously unpublished texts and emails from since-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok.

Read...

Read what?  Horowitz has already referred crimes to Barr for criminal indictment regarding leaks by Comey.  Guess what?  Barr declined to prosecute.

And those he may be considering NOW are not the same he turned down.  Again, it's a process and I'm willing to see how it goes without saying for certain.  Read what I said above.  You asked for a list and I'm not predicting a thing like yourself.

Why turn any down?  Those were absolute slam dunks.  Give me your list, chicken.

[zigbee]

LESS WHITES were for Trump that voted for Romney

[ScarletHayes]

LESS WHITES for for Trump that voted for Romney

On its face I find that extremely hard to believe, but Trump likely peeled off more minority votes than Romney did to make up the difference and then some.  

I think there is one point of agreement we can all reach:  Trump is a very UNIQUE individual and president.  He's upset the apple-cart in a multitude of ways.  Voting demos just being another of them

[Hightop77]

LESS WHITES were for Trump that voted for Romney

Because Libertarians and Green Party, nearly all white votes, got nearly 5% of the vote in 2016, a record for third parties.  The white/non-white split in 2012 and 2016 was still 20 points, 59-39 in 2012 and 57-37 in 2016.

[zigbee]

LESS WHITES were for Trump that voted for Romney

Because Libertarians and Green Party, nearly all white votes, got nearly 5% of the vote in 2016, a record for third parties.  The white/non-white split in 2012 and 2016 was still 20 points, 59-39 in 2012 and 57-37 in 2016.

AND...the OTHER...DOOOOOOMED