This entire Impeach Trump drama is nothing more than Dems vs Republicans

[BigDroppa]

The Dems have demanded their political rival , Trump be investigated from day 1. Their political rival.  From his businesses , bank accounts , taxes , hush money for his affairs , and the fake russian collusion
coup. 

The Libs are still butt hurt and Trump just keeps winning and lobbing juvenile names that are really beneath the office ....and it drives the libs nuts.

A Trump win in 2020 will be very bad for libs

It would be horrible for libs. Just the SCOTUS alone would be monumental in terms of stemming the liberal tide when the old bat dies.

 These creeps that made up lies and their handlers that peddle the information about Kavanaugh should be sued for libel, but they get away with it and itâ€s SOP for the Dems.

[BigDroppa]

https://www.amgreatness.com/2019/10/05/a...ment-scam/

[ScarletHayes]

https://www.amgreatness.com/2019/10/05/a...ment-scam/

This is the quote, the body of which, I keep coming back to over and over again:


Remember the meme that it was the Russians who hacked the DNC server? CrowdStrike is the sole, the only source of that contention. The FBI apparently asked to examine the server but the DNC refused, turning it over to their own their own people who told them and the world exactly what they wanted to hear.

[BigDroppa]

I did not know Crowdstrike had a founder that was Ukrainian.

[ScarletHayes]

I did not know Crowdstrike had a founder that was Ukrainian.

[lrrps21]

Second whistleblower crying wolf . And nobody cares

Monica has a sister?

[cincydawg]

If the second one has no additional information about the call or anything else, they are superfluous it would seem.

[ScarletHayes]

If the second one has no additional information about the call or anything else, they are superfluous it would seem.

Iâ€m still trying to figure out the relevance of the first “whistle blower.”  We have the transcript of the call.

[lrrps21]

If the second one has no additional information about the call or anything else, they are superfluous it would seem.

Iâ€m still trying to figure out the relevance of the first “whistle blower.”  We have the transcript of the call.

Brennan is due to be 'interviewed' in person. Seems these folks knew the I.G. is about to wrap up one investigation, so they try to get out front with some WB burfle. The timing is always suspicious and the changing of the criteria from 1st hand to hearsay is the cherry on top.

Brennan also told folks in the IC to do 'anything they can' - meaning WB burfle.

We officially live in a banana republic. USA USA USA

[ScarletHayes]

Brennan is due to be 'interviewed' in person. Seems these folks knew the I.G. is about to wrap up one investigation, so they try to get out front with some WB burfle. The timing is always suspicious and the changing of the criteria from 1st hand to hearsay is the cherry on top.

Brennan also told folks in the IC to do 'anything they can' - meaning WB burfle.

We officially live in a banana republic. USA USA USA

There was a time that this would qualify as hyperbole.  Sadly that time is no more.

[lrrps21]

Brennan is due to be 'interviewed' in person. Seems these folks knew the I.G. is about to wrap up one investigation, so they try to get out front with some WB burfle. The timing is always suspicious and the changing of the criteria from 1st hand to hearsay is the cherry on top.

Brennan also told folks in the IC to do 'anything they can' - meaning WB burfle.

We officially live in a banana republic. USA USA USA

There was a time that this would qualify as hyperbole.  Sadly that time is no more.

Yup

[Hightop77]

If the second one has no additional information about the call or anything else, they are superfluous it would seem.

Iâ€m still trying to figure out the relevance of the first “whistle blower.”  We have the transcript of the call.

Brennan is due to be 'interviewed' in person. Seems these folks knew the I.G. is about to wrap up one investigation, so they try to get out front with some WB burfle. The timing is always suspicious and the changing of the criteria from 1st hand to hearsay is the cherry on top.

Brennan also told folks in the IC to do 'anything they can' - meaning WB burfle.

We officially live in a banana republic. USA USA USA

Which, based on how government works, should be extremely easier to determine who was involved in authorizing that part.  Yet no one seems to be doing anything to find out it.  It is definitely a banana republic and what makes it so is not the blatant abuse of power by Obama's people, but the looking the other way by the people running the DOJ right now.  So far, Barr has proven to me that he is part of the corruption.

[ScarletHayes]

HT, do you think the recent trip to Europe is part of a dog and pony show, or is he actually doing his job?  I guess this is rhetorical since I have a feeling I know how you will respond   , but I'm still holding out hope to see if anything comes of this "fact finding" mission or what exactly.

[Hightop77]

HT, do you think the recent trip to Europe is part of a dog and pony show, or is he actually doing his job?  I guess this is rhetorical since I have a feeling I know how you will respond   , but I'm still holding out hope to see if anything comes of this "fact finding" mission or what exactly.

You know what I think but they have to give the appearance they are doing something.  Look at it this way.  With all that we already know and that several books have been written about and even official criminal referrals made by both Congress and the IG, and yet there is still no grand jury, no real prosecutor, no subpoenas, no indictments, etc. etc.?  They won't even call it an investigation, just like Lynch did with Hillary.  How can that be?

[lrrps21]

If the second one has no additional information about the call or anything else, they are superfluous it would seem.

Iâ€m still trying to figure out the relevance of the first “whistle blower.”  We have the transcript of the call.

Brennan is due to be 'interviewed' in person. Seems these folks knew the I.G. is about to wrap up one investigation, so they try to get out front with some WB burfle. The timing is always suspicious and the changing of the criteria from 1st hand to hearsay is the cherry on top.

Brennan also told folks in the IC to do 'anything they can' - meaning WB burfle.

We officially live in a banana republic. USA USA USA

Which, based on how government works, should be extremely easier to determine who was involved in authorizing that part.  Yet no one seems to be doing anything to find out it.  It is definitely a banana republic and what makes it so is not the blatant abuse of power by Obama's people, but the looking the other way by the people running the DOJ right now.  So far, Barr has proven to me that he is part of the corruption.

Want to prove who the WB is or isn't? Simply ask that person to rewrite the complaint. The person who probably wrote the complaint - Adam Schiff.