1% of black women support Trump

[3rdgensooner]

I don't know that the Dems have less baggage. More like different baggage. Part of the hag's problem was just her awful personality. Just impossible to like. Sanders and Warren are angry types espousing flat out insane policies that son't appeal even to huge chunks of Dems. They also have at least some baggage. The Native American lie for Warren and the goofy praise of actual communists/communism by Sanders. Biden has been a second rater his whole career and has a habit of lying a lot about his past and saying really goofy and stupid things (he's a Dem so these are termed "gaffes"). He also appears to be just on the cusp of dementia. Are they the pathological liar with an incredibly odious persona like Hillary? No but they are an incredibly weak bunch.

 None of them are as problematic as Hillary.  Whoever Trump goes against will be a stronger candidate than he faced in 2016.

Maybe not. Sanders lost to the hag. Biden might not stay compos mentis, if that's what he is now, through a campaign.

[zigbee]

This may be one of the worst posts Iâ€ve ever seen on this board.

Better watch out, Stx will say you are talking out of your ass and ganging up on poor little p1tchblack.  Read through this thread and see what you think.

Not going to say that at all. Pitch can stand up for himself. Just asking for some clarification when someone launches into a typical NH rant. Staying focused during a thread and not devolving into "I know you are but what am I squabbling" is a problem for some in the NH. Some people like to think "I am owning poster x, y, z", instead of "I'm providing a logical counterpoint to poster x, y, z's original question/statement".

Hmmmm, can you please link a thread where I've said I know you are whatever and what am I ?  Or I said I'm owning someone on here?   Keener agreed P1tch made a bad comparison which was my original point and that is all.  This is the second or third time in last week I've not even addressed you when posting to P1tch and you've come running...hmmmm

I'm talking about the general thrust of things on here, whenever you,Genius, HT, go down the rabbit hole with pitch-the threads devolve into pointless squabbling with no one addressing the original point. It is what it is.

So, in other words what you posted about above you cannot link.  He made a stupid comparison and was called out.   He gets called out on here all the time for his postings.  He asks questions and then stumps for answers but won't answer himself when asked.

[P1tchblack]

Better watch out, Stx will say you are talking out of your ass and ganging up on poor little p1tchblack.  Read through this thread and see what you think.

Not going to say that at all. Pitch can stand up for himself. Just asking for some clarification when someone launches into a typical NH rant. Staying focused during a thread and not devolving into "I know you are but what am I squabbling" is a problem for some in the NH. Some people like to think "I am owning poster x, y, z", instead of "I'm providing a logical counterpoint to poster x, y, z's original question/statement".

Hmmmm, can you please link a thread where I've said I know you are whatever and what am I ?  Or I said I'm owning someone on here?   Keener agreed P1tch made a bad comparison which was my original point and that is all.  This is the second or third time in last week I've not even addressed you when posting to P1tch and you've come running...hmmmm

I'm talking about the general thrust of things on here, whenever you,Genius, HT, go down the rabbit hole with pitch-the threads devolve into pointless squabbling with no one addressing the original point. It is what it is.

So, in other words what you posted about above you cannot link.  He made a stupid comparison and was called out.   He gets called out on here all the time for his postings.  He asks questions and then stumps for answers but won't answer himself when asked.

What question, that was related to a discussion topic, have i not answered?

[3rdgensooner]

As far as blacks voting Dem and not GOP all I have to say is how is that working out for ya? Playing the endless victim might get you an extra handout here or there but that doesn't buy anything but permanent poverty and failure in the long run.

[Brutus Buckeye]

For a free hair and nail appointment on the first of every month, I bet that at least 33.3% of the Negresses would vote for Trump.

[Hightop77]

As far as blacks voting Dem and not GOP all I have to say is how is that working out for ya? Playing the endless victim might get you an extra handout here or there but that doesn't buy anything but permanent poverty and failure in the long run.

But I would say for most of them, they are getting just what they want.  The ones who are intelligent enough and who want to work have special advantages in terms of education and employment so they can excel far above their ability.  The ones who want to live off the government with no personal responsibility are able to do that and live amazingly well.  I don't blame blacks for voting Democrat.  Doing so gives them things that keep them far above what they would otherwise get.  We saw how they did on their own prior to the Great Society without government assistance.

Nixon and Ford's Agriculture Secretary Earl Butz wisely noted when asked why the GOP could not attract more black voters, 'I'll tell you what the coloreds want. It's three things: first, a tight p*ssy; second, loose shoes; and third, a warm place to sh*t."

[zigbee]

Not going to say that at all. Pitch can stand up for himself. Just asking for some clarification when someone launches into a typical NH rant. Staying focused during a thread and not devolving into "I know you are but what am I squabbling" is a problem for some in the NH. Some people like to think "I am owning poster x, y, z", instead of "I'm providing a logical counterpoint to poster x, y, z's original question/statement".

Hmmmm, can you please link a thread where I've said I know you are whatever and what am I ?  Or I said I'm owning someone on here?   Keener agreed P1tch made a bad comparison which was my original point and that is all.  This is the second or third time in last week I've not even addressed you when posting to P1tch and you've come running...hmmmm

I'm talking about the general thrust of things on here, whenever you,Genius, HT, go down the rabbit hole with pitch-the threads devolve into pointless squabbling with no one addressing the original point. It is what it is.

So, in other words what you posted about above you cannot link.  He made a stupid comparison and was called out.   He gets called out on here all the time for his postings.  He asks questions and then stumps for answers but won't answer himself when asked.

What question, that was related to a discussion topic, have i not answered?

Keep squirming.....I asked you what issues do the dem candidates espouse you support.  Easy to answer.  Doesn't have a thing to do with the topic.

[P1tchblack]

Hmmmm, can you please link a thread where I've said I know you are whatever and what am I ?  Or I said I'm owning someone on here?   Keener agreed P1tch made a bad comparison which was my original point and that is all.  This is the second or third time in last week I've not even addressed you when posting to P1tch and you've come running...hmmmm

I'm talking about the general thrust of things on here, whenever you,Genius, HT, go down the rabbit hole with pitch-the threads devolve into pointless squabbling with no one addressing the original point. It is what it is.

So, in other words what you posted about above you cannot link.  He made a stupid comparison and was called out.   He gets called out on here all the time for his postings.  He asks questions and then stumps for answers but won't answer himself when asked.

What question, that was related to a discussion topic, have i not answered?

Keep squirming.....I asked you what issues do the dem candidates espouse you support.  Easy to answer.  Doesn't have a thing to do with the topic.

I saw the question and ignored it.  The topic was black, female voters and why they don't support Trump and rarely vote for the republican party.   What does my opinion of the Dem platform have to do with that?

[zigbee]

I'm talking about the general thrust of things on here, whenever you,Genius, HT, go down the rabbit hole with pitch-the threads devolve into pointless squabbling with no one addressing the original point. It is what it is.

So, in other words what you posted about above you cannot link.  He made a stupid comparison and was called out.   He gets called out on here all the time for his postings.  He asks questions and then stumps for answers but won't answer himself when asked.

What question, that was related to a discussion topic, have i not answered?

Keep squirming.....I asked you what issues do the dem candidates espouse you support.  Easy to answer.  Doesn't have a thing to do with the topic.

I saw the question and ignored it.  The topic was black, female voters and why they don't support Trump and rarely vote for the republican party.   What does my opinion of the Dem platform have to do with that?

Keep squirming....

[zigbee]

To assert the 2020 dem candidate will be better than Clinton is a joke.  NONE of them are any better.  Clinton was Sec or State, senator, etc.  Biden has more credential wise but he's a 76 years old!   The all suck.

You're only see it from a Republican POV.  To you, 99% of all Dems suck.  To Dems, none of the 2020 candidates will be as bad as Hillary, while Trump will still be a *****.

Not at all.   You may think Trump is a ***** but can you not agree he is moving to build a wall, stop illegal immigration, cut taxes, make better trade deals...do any of the dems stand for these issues?  What issues do you support the "better" candidates from the dems espouse?

Bumpidty BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[P1tchblack]

For the sake of moving on, here are some of the things i generally agree with Dems on:

Gay rights
Stop wasting money on a "war on drugs"
Less use of US military to occupy/police the world
Addressing infringement of rights by law enforcement
Shrinking the military
Keeping religion out of schools/government

EDIT: i haven't watched a single dem debate, so i have no idea what each one supports/doesn't support because there's a 99% chance i won't vote for any of them.  I don't need to know their positions to know they have less baggage than Hillary.

[zigbee]

For the sake of moving on, here are some of the things i generally agree with Dems on:

Gay rights
Stop wasting money on a "war on drugs"
Less use of US military to occupy/police the world
Addressing infringement of rights by law enforcement
Shrinking the military
Keeping religion out of schools/government

Can you link where republicans either support what you oppose or they oppose what you support in the above?  Seems pretty nebulous to me and I'm sure to the board.
Who doesn't support rights of all people?  What rights are gays denied?  Didn't the supreme court rule on gay marriage?  Tell us which republican doesn't support gay rights?
Legalize all drugs?  Won't work.  OBTW...which dem wants all drugs legal?
Bring home all troops?  Which dem supports this?
Which dem feels police infringe on our rights?  Which republican wants our rights to be infringed by police?
What is the difference in shrinking military and policing the world?
Which republican want religion in school?  Which dems wants it out?


EDIT: HOW do you know these dem candidates have less baggage and more electable if you ADMIT you know not a damn thing about them?

[P1tchblack]

For the sake of moving on, here are some of the things i generally agree with Dems on:

Gay rights
Stop wasting money on a "war on drugs"
Less use of US military to occupy/police the world
Addressing infringement of rights by law enforcement
Shrinking the military
Keeping religion out of schools/government

So, clearly you're not understanding the difference between "baggage" and "political views".  There are no Dem candidates that have the kind of baggage hanging over them to the extent that Hillary had.  I stopped responding to your questions because I'm not talking about specific candidates.  I'm talking about general differences of opinion between the two parties. I'm still thoroughly confused as to why my political views are important in a thread about blacks/black women.

Can you link where republicans either support what you oppose or they oppose what you support in the above?  Seems pretty nebulous to me and I'm sure to the board.

 The items above, to anyone that follows politics, are pretty standard areas where, in general, the parties have differed.

Who doesn't support rights of all people?  What rights are gays denied?  Didn't the supreme court rule on gay marriage?  Tell us which republican doesn't support gay rights?

Rights for gays, specifically marriage, has been a point of contention between the two parties for a long time. Again, this is Politics 101.  The only thing that has really changed is that most Rep candidates are smart enough to keep quiet about their views because it will likely hurt their chances of being elected.

Legalize all drugs?  Won't work.  OBTW...which dem wants all drugs legal?

Aaaaaagain, Politics 101.  Dems push FOR gay marriage..  Republicans fight gay marriage.  Dems push for legalizing weed/drugs.  Republicans fight to keep drugs illegal.

Bring home all troops?  Which dem supports this?

Again, these are generalizations about the party's platform.  Republicans tend to be the "let's get involved all over the world and stay there for decades."

Which dem feels police infringe on our rights?  Which republican wants our rights to be infringed by police?
What is the difference in shrinking military and policing the world?
Which republican want religion in school?  Which dems wants it out?


EDIT:  HOW do you know these dem candidates have less baggage and more electable if you ADMIT you know not a damn thing about them?

[zigbee]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

                   MUMBO JUMBO...no links or any type of affirmation per usual from our squirmy friend P1tchblack

[Brutus Buckeye]

I think that Zig and Pitch ought to dook it out.