I frequently invite liberals to participate here

[K9Buck]

As far as I can tell, none of them ever do.  They're apparently uncomfortable discussing topics with people who don't share their views.  That's unfortunate.  I like talking to people who disagree with me because, sometimes, I learn from them and can change or modify my own view.  As they say, one who doesn't know his opponent's argument doesn't fully understand his own.

[Brutus Buckeye]

They like their echo Chambers. They will even ban other liberals that date to disagree with them on so much as a singular political issue.

[cincydawg]

I was just reading an articles about how the NYT is not nearly liberal enough for many liberals. Apparently they are taking a good bit of heat for that.

https://newrepublic.com/article/146828/l...york-times

And Sarah Kendzior, reacting to a Douthat column about White House adviser Stephen Millerâ€s importance in any immigration negotiations, outright declared the Times “a white supremacist paper.”

[P1tchblack]

As far as I can tell, none of them ever do.  They're apparently uncomfortable discussing topics with people who don't share their views.  That's unfortunate.  I like talking to people who disagree with me because, sometimes, I learn from them and can change or modify my own view.  As they say, one who doesn't know his opponent's argument doesn't fully understand his own.

With a few exceptions, liberals are generally unable to intelligently support their positions

[cincydawg]

I would limit that to Leftists, more than Liberals. I still think of Liberals in the old time Tip O'Neil/Bill Bradley sense.

[P1tchblack]

I would limit that to Leftists, more than Liberals.  I still think of Liberals in the old time Tip O'Neil/Bill Bradley sense.

To a point I agree. At one point liberals were about personal freedom and individual rights. That concept has gotten way off course in many cases.

[zigbee]

I would limit that to Leftists, more than Liberals.  I still think of Liberals in the old time Tip O'Neil/Bill Bradley sense.

I consider those guys blue dog dems.  Hell, they'd be republicans today.

Liberals today come in LEVELs of silliness/radicalism.  Pelosi-Schumer is level 3.  Sanders is level 2.  Omar/Tlaib, Ocasio-Cortez level 1 dang nuts.

[K9Buck]

I would limit that to Leftists, more than Liberals.  I still think of Liberals in the old time Tip O'Neil/Bill Bradley sense.

The so-called ''liberals'' vote the same as the communists.

[lrrps21]

The so-called ''liberals'' vote the same as the communists.

It's the only time they freely speak out (vote). I refer to today's liberals as 'silent complicitors'. Same as the mooooooslims who refuse to take a stand against the peaceful ones blowing up children.

There is no such thing as a liberal. There is no such thing as a moderate mooooooooooslim.

[cincydawg]

I'd guess a lot of liberals voted against Trump just as a lot of Rinos voted against Hillary.

[P1tchblack]

I'd guess a lot of liberals voted against Trump just as a lot of Rinos voted against Hillary.

I like to believe, for the sake of my faith in humanity, the very few people voted FOR Trump or Hillary.

[BWT30]

It's times like these when I sit back and think what will happen if one of these liberal loonies gets elected as President.

[P1tchblack]

It's times like these when I sit back and think what will happen if one of these liberal loonies gets elected as President.

Probably nothing....what happened when Obama was president for 8 years?

[Brutus Buckeye]

We nearly became an Islamic version of Mexico.

[BWT30]

It's times like these when I sit back and think what will happen if one of these liberal loonies gets elected as President.

Probably nothing....what happened when Obama was president for 8 years?

There is a big difference between that party and the current one