Jeffrey Epstein Has Been Arrested For Sex Trafficking of Minors

[BoyGenius]

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/07...ngbriefing&fbclid=IwAR2-uuQIeIXNwBEuk5gHwyir2n5buw2HaFHltvYOzqYeDLrJmBlCWZiu42c

I'm hard pressed not to see media bias in the coverage of this story, in spades.

It's Red State... Red State.

[cincydawg]

Yes, it states that in the link.

[BoyGenius]

Yes, it states that in the link.

Did you think they were a neutral site?
Red State = a heavy right lean. That is the purpose of the name "Red State".
Moving forward, no need to mention the political bias of Red State. It obvious to most folks.

[ScarletHayes]

Will be a hoot to see Joe Scarborough, Donnie Douche, Don Lemon, et al forced to comment on this.  Cracks in the media dam?  Stay tuned, but definitely do NOT hold your breath.

They won't be forced to comment, which I suppose is your point.  The story is buried now.

A story like this could shed more light on a topic they don't want covered.  Only takes one or two lib sites to go off the reservation.  I believe this story mentioned Buzzfeed, so maybe there are actually some fissures percolating.

[cincydawg]

Yes, I figured everyone here understood Red State had a heavy right lean. I didn't know I should have made a point of it.

[BoyGenius]

But... you made the effort to specifically make the point, highlighting their political bias... "in spades".

I'm hard pressed not to see media bias in the coverage of this story, in spades.

[cincydawg]

Yes, I see a lot of media bias in how this story was covered by the media. Is that hard to comprehend?

The link to redstate is a recounting of how the story had legs, and then suddenly did not.

This is SIMPLE stuff. Maybe I need to dumb it down further.

Here is a link to how the story suddenly died. This looks like clear cut media bias to me. Perhaps others think the media handling of this story is just fine. I don't.

[BoyGenius]

Moving on... just odd you seemed surprised an opinion piece from Red State was politically biased "in spades" when that is what Red State does "in spades".

[cincydawg]

Moving on... just odd you seemed surprised an opinion piece from Red State was politically biased "in spades" when that is what Red State does "in spades".

You seem unable to grasp the simplest English around here consistently.

I was not surprised by that AT ALL.

My comments were about media handling of this topic, not about Red State, as I explained several times in simple English.

[BoyGenius]

You post link to a Red State article, commenting about media bias of "this story".
You weren't referring to Red State's story or bias, but the overall media coverage? Hmp. Okay.

[cincydawg]

Next time you can't understand my post, try asking me to clarify it.

For a change.

I was clearly talking about MEDIA BIAS.

[BoyGenius]

As I said... posting a Red State story, commenting about the bias in "this story" and yet you aren't commenting on Red State... hmp and okay.

[cincydawg]

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/07...ngbriefing&fbclid=IwAR2-uuQIeIXNwBEuk5gHwyir2n5buw2HaFHltvYOzqYeDLrJmBlCWZiu42c


I'm hard pressed not to see media bias in the coverage of this story, in spades.

Maybe if you didn't try and distort what I actually said I would make more sense.

If you don't understand, ask for clarification.

[BoyGenius]

Some free advice... you might want to work on your written communication skills.

[cincydawg]

Everybody posts things at times which are unclear or confusing. It's pretty simple to ask them to clarify instead of carping vaguely about it for page after page.