The Australian government has ordered my tweet below to be taken down. @X can face a fine of up to $782,500 AUD if they do not comply.

I don’t know if any civil action or fine can be directed at me under that law.

A delegate for the eSafety Commissioner says “an ordinary… https://t.co/AApAMktPwR pic.twitter.com/2iqfsKA1uC

— Billboard Chris ???? (@BillboardChris) March 26, 2024

pic.twitter.com/mHSrrJdsML

— Buckeye66 (@Buckeye662) March 26, 2024

Sorry for the delay.  More demerits for me this week!  Here you go.  


https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2...dition.php

Hope you have great day!
34 today

I could not find the old one, but feel free to merge this one into that one if it still is around.

Quote:

The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland which crosses the Patapsco River has reportedly Collapsed within the last few minutes after being Struck by a Large Container Ship; a Mass Casualty Incident has been Declared with over a Dozen Cars and many Individuals said to… pic.twitter.com/SsPMU8Mjph

— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) March 26, 2024

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The hills are alive
With the sound of music
With songs they have sung
For a thousand years
My heart wants to sing every song it hears
My heart wants to beat like the wings of the birds that rise from the lake to the trees

BREAKING: Trump's net worth skyrockets to $6.4 billion, making him one of the top 500 richest people on earth - Bloomberg pic.twitter.com/ztEGgBKcSY

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 25, 2024

Who do you feel has been the best?
Ronald Reagan?
FDR?
Dwight Eisenhower?
William Clinton?
Abraham Lincoln?
Theodore Roosevelt?
Woodrow Wilson?
Barack Obama?
Thomas Jefferson?
Calvin Coolidge?
James K Polk?

Jurisdictions now commonly designate non-white, criminal, perpetrators, as "white".  They've also been classifying male criminals who dress like women as "female".  

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/...lZPaNUMCPw&s=19

Minnesota lawmaker proposes making it legal for women to go topless, citing 'gender identity'
Samantha Sencer-Mura said the law feels 'antiquated' amid shifts in 'gender identity'
A Minnesota lawmaker wants to make it legal for women to go topless in public after a resident was sentenced to jail for "indecent exposure" related to uncovered breasts.

"This to me seems really wrong," Minnesota House Rep. Samantha Sencer-Mura told The Star Tribune regarding the conviction. "Particularly now, as we as a society are thinking differently about gender and gender identity, I think this law feels very antiquated."

Sencer-Mura, a member of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, admitted that her proposal would likely not be heard this year, but she hopes it will spark widespread discussions on shifts in gender identity and expression.

Eloisa Plancarte was sentenced to 90 days in jail following an arrest by Rochester police in 2021, who responded to a call that a woman was walking around a convenience store parking lot with her breasts out.


Plancarte appealed the conviction and claimed it violated her constitutional right to equal protection under the law. She noted that men would not be charged if their chests were exposed in public. The Minnesota Court of Appeals later voted 2-1 to uphold the decision.

In the motion to deny the appeal, Judge Kevin G. Ross referenced a nearly 40-year-old decision that upheld a conviction for a woman who was seen sunbathing topless in Minneapolis Park.

The dissenting voice on the case was Judge Diane B. Bratvold, a woman, who said the decision "raises more questions about criminal conduct than it clarifies."

She also questioned whether it would be illegal for a transgender man who did not have breast removal surgery to be exposed in public. Judge Jon Schmidt, who upheld the conviction, also expressed concern about what the decision meant for transgender individuals.


Sencer-Mura, who has co-authored the proposed amendment with fellow Democrat Rep. Brion Curran, told the media that current laws allow too much flexibility for officers when it comes to a suspect's gender identity.

"If law enforcement believes that someone identifies as a female, then they're going to treat them differently if they have their shirt off than they would someone that they perceive to be a male," Sencer-Mura said. "As we have a shifting understanding of gender, that law just doesn't make sense anymore."


Minnesota law currently defines indecent exposure as an incident where someone "willfully and lewdly exposes the person's body, or the private parts thereof."