zigbeenuthouse

Rand Paul trolling Schiff...

An anonymous “whistleblower” informs us that this was found in a hotel room that @RepAdamSchiff recently check out of. Hmmm… pic.twitter.com/hk3ni4G7ms — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) January 16, 2020

Have you scrolled the reactions to it?   The pearl clutching is something to behold!  These people are having a meltdown over that?!?!?!?!?!?!  Seriously, look at those responses?  WTF??????

Two weeks of garbage. Inevitable acquittal. Socialists crying. Bern and the Indian Princess kept out of the game. Quid pro Joe rumblin, stumblin, bumblin into the primary. There you have it. Trump is absolutely going to eat the eventual sacrificial lamb alive.

(01-17-2020, 10:30 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: [ -> ]Have you scrolled the reactions to it?   The pearl clutching is something to behold!  These people are having a meltdown over that?!?!?!?!?!?!  Seriously, look at those responses?  WTF??????

Yes, I read some and had to stop.

(01-17-2020, 10:59 AM)BoyGenius Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-17-2020, 10:30 AM)ScarletHayes Wrote: [ -> ]Have you scrolled the reactions to it?   The pearl clutching is something to behold!  These people are having a meltdown over that?!?!?!?!?!?!  Seriously, look at those responses?  WTF??????

Yes, I read some and had to stop.

the delusion is strong with them.

Short of evidence of irrefutable evidence of Trump sleeping with a dead tranny illegal alien hooker, nothing is going to come of this. A lot of noise for a few weeks, an acquittal, and then throngs of Hollywood icons making foul mouthed rants, absolutely nothing with come of this. This will only make him stronger, not weaker. Fools................

This is good for Trump and I hope he realizes it. The likes of Nadler and Schiff on TV unfiltered is a big positive for Trump and the GOP. Except for hyper-partisans of the left those guys creep out normal people. Lefties and Dems on camera are always a good thing. The press normally runs interference and anytime you can get that partisan media filter out of the way it hurts the left.

Newt Gingrich weighs in:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/newt-gin...by-history

Finally, it’s clear the House Democrats have failed utterly to live up to the standard of prosecution set out by former Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson (who served as chief prosecutor of the Nuremberg trials). Jackson cautioned the Conference of United States Attorneys on April 1, 1940:
“With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.”
So no, Nancy. President Trump does not have to fear the judgment of history on this impeachment effort.

(01-18-2020, 08:04 PM)zigbee Wrote: [ -> ]Newt Gingrich weighs in:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/newt-gin...by-history

Finally, it’s clear the House Democrats have failed utterly to live up to the standard of prosecution set out by former Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson (who served as chief prosecutor of the Nuremberg trials). Jackson cautioned the Conference of United States Attorneys on April 1, 1940:
“With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.”
So no, Nancy. President Trump does not have to fear the judgment of history on this impeachment effort.

I've not seen a better summation of what has been happening in this country.  Justice Jackson was clairvoyant.  This is going to be a nasty two to three weeks but Trump will come out of it more powerful than he was when they started the witch-hunt.  I just want to see those smug smirks on all their faces replaced with tears of sorrow.  Can't happen soon enough.

Propaganda is a POWERFUL tool of the corrupt left.   They, with the complicity of the media, have hoodwinked a great majority of the public into really believing this is on the up and up and Trump put the nation at risk and tried to fix the 2020 election vs Biden.  AGAIN, NO ONE would even had known of this call (and of course the money was sent and no public announcement by Ukraine over Biden ever happened) unless the dems and the media produced it.

It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group.


Explain's why Pelosi made it clear this wasn't personal. Except it is Nancy and anyone paying attention knows it to be fact.

What did Chuck Schumer have to say 20 years ago on impeachment?  Hmmmmmmmm

https://nypost.com/2020/01/18/charles-sc...-bite-him/

Heard an interview with Hakeem Jeffries D who will be on the side of the dems.  Nadler better be good because this guy was believing the fairy tales of what law is vs what he thinks it should be and that is me being kind.

I really doubt you'll see witnesses but the dems are pretty dumb.
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk...to-up-to-8